Contraceptive and hormonal medication decision-making for pregnancy prevention and gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review and conceptual framework.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Elena Proffitt, Disha Dhar, Lois Harvey-Pescott, Eleanor Brown, Abigail McNiven, Ammaarah Felix, Egrada De Lima, Yasmin Rahman, Julia V Bailey, Katy Vincent, Jennifer A Hall, Rose Stevens, Kelly Dickson
{"title":"Contraceptive and hormonal medication decision-making for pregnancy prevention and gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review and conceptual framework.","authors":"Elena Proffitt, Disha Dhar, Lois Harvey-Pescott, Eleanor Brown, Abigail McNiven, Ammaarah Felix, Egrada De Lima, Yasmin Rahman, Julia V Bailey, Katy Vincent, Jennifer A Hall, Rose Stevens, Kelly Dickson","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2026-203239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a decline in the number of contraceptive appointments and prescriptions in the UK. Existing evidence explores the impact of access, barriers and awareness on contraception use. However, less is known about the nuance of how individuals make these decisions. This review aimed to synthesise recent UK evidence on those assigned female at birth's attitudes, experiences and decision-making around contraception and hormonal medication for pregnancy prevention and/or gynaecological reasons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five academic databases and six online sources were systematically searched. Included studies were published in English from 2015 onwards and contained primary data on contraceptive decision-making for pregnancy prevention and/or gynaecological treatment in the UK. Studies were critically appraised for methodological reliability and usefulness in answering the review question. Data were coded deductively, inductively grouped conceptually and mapped onto a conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. There were ten qualitative, seven mixed methods and four quantitative studies with more focusing on pregnancy prevention (n=10) than on gynaecological management (n=5) and six focusing on both. The synthesis of substantive decision drivers from both quantitative and qualitative data demonstrates that decision-making is shaped by how methods felt in relation to the body; effects; seeking and navigating information; pressure and reproductive autonomy; and risk perception and desire. A decision-making conceptual framework was developed demonstrating the impact of contextual factors and the process of decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contraceptive and hormonal medication decision-making is a dynamic process shaped by complex trade-off balances, trial-and-error processes, evolving needs and individual contexts. Individuals often want to involve and trust others by sharing the decision-making process. Healthcare consultations must recognise the complexity of choice and use, and support contraceptive and hormonal medication decision-making across the life course.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2026-203239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been a decline in the number of contraceptive appointments and prescriptions in the UK. Existing evidence explores the impact of access, barriers and awareness on contraception use. However, less is known about the nuance of how individuals make these decisions. This review aimed to synthesise recent UK evidence on those assigned female at birth's attitudes, experiences and decision-making around contraception and hormonal medication for pregnancy prevention and/or gynaecological reasons.

Methods: Five academic databases and six online sources were systematically searched. Included studies were published in English from 2015 onwards and contained primary data on contraceptive decision-making for pregnancy prevention and/or gynaecological treatment in the UK. Studies were critically appraised for methodological reliability and usefulness in answering the review question. Data were coded deductively, inductively grouped conceptually and mapped onto a conceptual framework.

Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. There were ten qualitative, seven mixed methods and four quantitative studies with more focusing on pregnancy prevention (n=10) than on gynaecological management (n=5) and six focusing on both. The synthesis of substantive decision drivers from both quantitative and qualitative data demonstrates that decision-making is shaped by how methods felt in relation to the body; effects; seeking and navigating information; pressure and reproductive autonomy; and risk perception and desire. A decision-making conceptual framework was developed demonstrating the impact of contextual factors and the process of decision-making.

Conclusions: Contraceptive and hormonal medication decision-making is a dynamic process shaped by complex trade-off balances, trial-and-error processes, evolving needs and individual contexts. Individuals often want to involve and trust others by sharing the decision-making process. Healthcare consultations must recognise the complexity of choice and use, and support contraceptive and hormonal medication decision-making across the life course.

预防怀孕和妇科症状的避孕和激素药物决策:系统回顾和概念框架。
背景:在英国,避孕预约和处方的数量有所下降。现有证据探讨了获取、障碍和意识对避孕药具使用的影响。然而,人们对个人如何做出这些决定的细微差别知之甚少。这篇综述的目的是综合最近英国的证据,这些证据是关于那些在出生时被指定为女性的人对避孕和激素药物的态度、经验和决策,以预防怀孕和/或妇科原因。方法:系统检索5个学术数据库和6个网络资源。纳入的研究从2015年开始用英语发表,包含了英国预防怀孕和/或妇科治疗的避孕决策的主要数据。在回答回顾问题时,对研究的方法可靠性和有用性进行了批判性评价。数据被演绎编码,归纳概念分组,并映射到一个概念框架。结果:21项研究符合纳入标准。定性研究10项,混合研究7项,定量研究4项,其中预防妊娠研究(n=10)多于妇科管理研究(n=5),两者兼顾的研究6项。从定量和定性数据中对实质性决策驱动因素的综合表明,决策是由方法与身体的关系所决定的;效果;查找和导航信息;压力和生殖自主;风险感知和欲望。制定了决策概念框架,展示了环境因素和决策过程的影响。结论:避孕和激素用药决策是一个动态过程,受复杂的权衡平衡、试错过程、不断变化的需求和个体环境的影响。个人通常希望通过分享决策过程来参与和信任他人。医疗咨询必须认识到选择和使用的复杂性,并支持整个生命过程中的避孕和激素药物决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书