Association between supraglottic airway device use and respiratory adverse events during airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness: a report from the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia (J-PEDIA) registry.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yuka Uchinami, Takashi Soejima, Shingo Nishida, Yusuke Yamauchi, Fumio Watanabe, Shogo Ichiyanagi, Yu Kaiho, Taiki Kojima
{"title":"Association between supraglottic airway device use and respiratory adverse events during airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness: a report from the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia (J-PEDIA) registry.","authors":"Yuka Uchinami, Takashi Soejima, Shingo Nishida, Yusuke Yamauchi, Fumio Watanabe, Shogo Ichiyanagi, Yu Kaiho, Taiki Kojima","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with airway hyperresponsiveness face higher risks of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Although the use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is associated with fewer perioperative respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation in selected paediatric populations, evidence remains limited regarding induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. We aimed to investigate the association between SAD placement (vs tracheal intubation) and respiratory adverse events during induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 tertiary-care institutions (six paediatric and six mixed adult-paediatric university hospitals) in the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia registry between July 2022 and February 2025. We included children aged <18 yr undergoing general anaesthesia who had an active upper respiratory tract infection, an upper respiratory tract infection within the preceding 14 days, asthma exacerbation, or household smoking exposure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of respiratory adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 27 844 encounters, 4878 were analysed (tracheal intubation 3005 of 4878 [61.6%]; SAD 1873 of 4878 [38.4%]). After adjustment, SAD placement was associated with a lower risk of respiratory adverse events (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.62; P<0.001), airway management-related adverse events (aRR 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.45; P<0.001), and severe oxygen desaturation (aRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-0.75; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, SAD use during induction of anaesthesia was associated with a lower risk of adverse respiratory events in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. These findings support consideration of SADs when clinically appropriate while acknowledging potential residual confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with airway hyperresponsiveness face higher risks of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Although the use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is associated with fewer perioperative respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation in selected paediatric populations, evidence remains limited regarding induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. We aimed to investigate the association between SAD placement (vs tracheal intubation) and respiratory adverse events during induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 tertiary-care institutions (six paediatric and six mixed adult-paediatric university hospitals) in the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia registry between July 2022 and February 2025. We included children aged <18 yr undergoing general anaesthesia who had an active upper respiratory tract infection, an upper respiratory tract infection within the preceding 14 days, asthma exacerbation, or household smoking exposure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of respiratory adverse events.

Results: Of the 27 844 encounters, 4878 were analysed (tracheal intubation 3005 of 4878 [61.6%]; SAD 1873 of 4878 [38.4%]). After adjustment, SAD placement was associated with a lower risk of respiratory adverse events (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.62; P<0.001), airway management-related adverse events (aRR 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.45; P<0.001), and severe oxygen desaturation (aRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-0.75; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Overall, SAD use during induction of anaesthesia was associated with a lower risk of adverse respiratory events in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. These findings support consideration of SADs when clinically appropriate while acknowledging potential residual confounding.

声门上气道装置的使用与气道高反应性儿童气道管理期间呼吸不良事件的关联:来自日本儿科麻醉气道困难(J-PEDIA)登记处的一份报告。
背景:气道高反应性患儿围手术期呼吸不良事件发生的风险较高。虽然在选定的儿科人群中,声门上气道装置(SADs)的使用与气管插管相比,与围手术期呼吸不良事件的发生有关,但关于气道高反应性儿童诱导期气道管理的证据仍然有限。我们的目的是利用基于倾向评分的治疗加权逆概率,研究在气道高反应性儿童诱导期气道管理期间,SAD放置(与气管插管)与呼吸不良事件之间的关系。方法:这项多中心回顾性队列研究于2022年7月至2025年2月在日本儿科麻醉困难气道登记处的12家三级医疗机构(6家儿科和6家成人-儿科混合大学医院)进行。结果:27844例病例中,4878例进行了分析(4878例中气管插管3005例(61.6%);4878例中SAD 1873例(38.4%))。调整后,SAD放置与较低的呼吸不良事件风险相关(调整后的风险比[aRR] 0.41; 95%可信区间[CI] 0.19-0.62; p结论:总体而言,在诱导麻醉期间使用SAD与气道高反应性儿童较低的呼吸不良事件风险相关。这些发现支持在临床适当时考虑SADs,同时承认潜在的残留混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书