Association between supraglottic airway device use and respiratory adverse events during airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness: a report from the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia (J-PEDIA) registry.
{"title":"Association between supraglottic airway device use and respiratory adverse events during airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness: a report from the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia (J-PEDIA) registry.","authors":"Yuka Uchinami, Takashi Soejima, Shingo Nishida, Yusuke Yamauchi, Fumio Watanabe, Shogo Ichiyanagi, Yu Kaiho, Taiki Kojima","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with airway hyperresponsiveness face higher risks of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Although the use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is associated with fewer perioperative respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation in selected paediatric populations, evidence remains limited regarding induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. We aimed to investigate the association between SAD placement (vs tracheal intubation) and respiratory adverse events during induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 tertiary-care institutions (six paediatric and six mixed adult-paediatric university hospitals) in the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia registry between July 2022 and February 2025. We included children aged <18 yr undergoing general anaesthesia who had an active upper respiratory tract infection, an upper respiratory tract infection within the preceding 14 days, asthma exacerbation, or household smoking exposure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of respiratory adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 27 844 encounters, 4878 were analysed (tracheal intubation 3005 of 4878 [61.6%]; SAD 1873 of 4878 [38.4%]). After adjustment, SAD placement was associated with a lower risk of respiratory adverse events (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.62; P<0.001), airway management-related adverse events (aRR 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.45; P<0.001), and severe oxygen desaturation (aRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-0.75; P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, SAD use during induction of anaesthesia was associated with a lower risk of adverse respiratory events in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. These findings support consideration of SADs when clinically appropriate while acknowledging potential residual confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Children with airway hyperresponsiveness face higher risks of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Although the use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is associated with fewer perioperative respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation in selected paediatric populations, evidence remains limited regarding induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. We aimed to investigate the association between SAD placement (vs tracheal intubation) and respiratory adverse events during induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 tertiary-care institutions (six paediatric and six mixed adult-paediatric university hospitals) in the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia registry between July 2022 and February 2025. We included children aged <18 yr undergoing general anaesthesia who had an active upper respiratory tract infection, an upper respiratory tract infection within the preceding 14 days, asthma exacerbation, or household smoking exposure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of respiratory adverse events.
Results: Of the 27 844 encounters, 4878 were analysed (tracheal intubation 3005 of 4878 [61.6%]; SAD 1873 of 4878 [38.4%]). After adjustment, SAD placement was associated with a lower risk of respiratory adverse events (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.62; P<0.001), airway management-related adverse events (aRR 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.45; P<0.001), and severe oxygen desaturation (aRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-0.75; P<0.001).
Conclusions: Overall, SAD use during induction of anaesthesia was associated with a lower risk of adverse respiratory events in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. These findings support consideration of SADs when clinically appropriate while acknowledging potential residual confounding.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.