Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a bridge to surgery versus direct surgery following SEMS placement in obstructive left-sided colon cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yang Shi, Zhi Wei Zhai, Ke Cao, Chun Xiang Ye, Yan Sen Li, Yan Lei Wang, Kai Yan Yang, Zhao Ding, Xu Hua Hu, Yong Dai, Qun Qian, Gui Ying Wang, Zhen Jun Wang, Jia Gang Han
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a bridge to surgery versus direct surgery following SEMS placement in obstructive left-sided colon cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study.","authors":"Yang Shi, Zhi Wei Zhai, Ke Cao, Chun Xiang Ye, Yan Sen Li, Yan Lei Wang, Kai Yan Yang, Zhao Ding, Xu Hua Hu, Yong Dai, Qun Qian, Gui Ying Wang, Zhen Jun Wang, Jia Gang Han","doi":"10.1038/s41416-026-03623-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the perioperative complications and long-term outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) placement combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by elective surgery in patients with complete obstructive left-sided colon cancer (COLCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter prospective study enrolled 246 COLCC patients, comparing SEMS-surgery (n = 105) and SEMS-neoadjuvant-surgery (n = 141). 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and 8-week landmark analyses were used to mitigate biases. Primary outcomes included SEMS-related complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PSM cohort (n = 206), SEMS-related complication rates were similar between the neoadjuvant and surgery-alone groups (15.5% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.845). The SEMS-neoadjuvant-surgery group demonstrated superior 5-year OS (66.2% vs. 51.7%, P < 0.001) and 5-year DFS (65.3% vs. 40.0%, P < 0.001). Landmark analysis consistently validated these survival benefits. Multivariable Cox regression confirmed neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent protective factor for both OS (HR = 0.436, 95% CI: 0.188-0.996, P = 0.015) and DFS (HR = 0.661, 95% CI: 0.551-0.830, P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SEMS-neoadjuvant-surgery strategy is associated with superior long-term survival without increasing SEMS-related complications, strongly supporting its clinical feasibility and oncological safety for COLCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03623-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the perioperative complications and long-term outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) placement combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by elective surgery in patients with complete obstructive left-sided colon cancer (COLCC).

Methods: A multicenter prospective study enrolled 246 COLCC patients, comparing SEMS-surgery (n = 105) and SEMS-neoadjuvant-surgery (n = 141). 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and 8-week landmark analyses were used to mitigate biases. Primary outcomes included SEMS-related complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results: In the PSM cohort (n = 206), SEMS-related complication rates were similar between the neoadjuvant and surgery-alone groups (15.5% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.845). The SEMS-neoadjuvant-surgery group demonstrated superior 5-year OS (66.2% vs. 51.7%, P < 0.001) and 5-year DFS (65.3% vs. 40.0%, P < 0.001). Landmark analysis consistently validated these survival benefits. Multivariable Cox regression confirmed neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent protective factor for both OS (HR = 0.436, 95% CI: 0.188-0.996, P = 0.015) and DFS (HR = 0.661, 95% CI: 0.551-0.830, P = 0.002).

Conclusion: The SEMS-neoadjuvant-surgery strategy is associated with superior long-term survival without increasing SEMS-related complications, strongly supporting its clinical feasibility and oncological safety for COLCC.

一项多中心前瞻性队列研究:新辅助化疗作为手术的桥梁,与SEMS放置后的直接手术相比
目的:探讨自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)置入联合新辅助化疗后择期手术治疗完全性左侧梗阻性结肠癌(COLCC)的围手术期并发症及远期疗效。方法:一项多中心前瞻性研究纳入246例COLCC患者,比较sem -手术(n = 105)和sem -新辅助手术(n = 141)。使用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)和8周里程碑分析来减轻偏差。主要结局包括sems相关并发症、总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。结果:在PSM队列(n = 206)中,新辅助组和单独手术组的sems相关并发症发生率相似(15.5%比14.6%,P = 0.845)。结论:在不增加sems相关并发症的情况下,sems -新辅助手术策略与较好的长期生存相关,有力地支持了其治疗COLCC的临床可行性和肿瘤安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书