Becoming a palliative care physician: how reflective learning shapes professional identity in postgraduate training - a qualitative study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kristoffer Marså, Dorte Høst, Louise Lausen, Bryan Cleal, Hanne Konradsen
{"title":"Becoming a palliative care physician: how reflective learning shapes professional identity in postgraduate training - a qualitative study.","authors":"Kristoffer Marså, Dorte Høst, Louise Lausen, Bryan Cleal, Hanne Konradsen","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2026-006251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2026-006251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
成为一名姑息治疗医生:反思性学习如何在研究生培训中塑造职业认同——一项定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨在丹麦的国家姑息治疗培训项目中,研究生医生如何通过反思性写作来体验和表达他们的专业发展。方法:进行描述性定性研究,分析来自28名不同临床专业经验丰富的医生的数据,采用反身性主题分析。参与者提交了两份强制性的反思性作业,重点关注他们在临床实践中的变化、决策过程以及对同事和患者的感知影响。结果:形成了六个相互关联的主题:(1)反思:从需求到实践;(2)学习如何学习:停下来思考正在发生的事情;(3)趋同:归属作为个人变化的条件;(4)课堂外学习生活:将反思融入日常实践;(5)学科互动:重新配置医生对医学的理解;(6)说希望:谦卑和专业意识。在这些主题中,参与者描述了从最初的抵制到持续的反思参与的转变,从而带来了更大的专业信心,关系谦卑和对患者护理的扩大理解。结论:研究生临终关怀教育中的反思性学习促进了参与者职业认同和临床方法的显著转变。这一过程增强了协作理解,加深了与患者体验的接触,并增强了应对医疗环境不确定性的强大能力。这些发现表明,在姑息治疗教育中优先考虑反思实践对于培养能够有效支持面临严重疾病和人类痛苦复杂性的个人的医疗保健专业人员至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书