The Clinical Utility of Individual Iodine Status Measures in Infants With Abnormal Thyroid Function: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sabrina Bilston-John, Ellen Fawcett, Yoon Hi Cho, Michelle Marion Jack
{"title":"The Clinical Utility of Individual Iodine Status Measures in Infants With Abnormal Thyroid Function: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sabrina Bilston-John, Ellen Fawcett, Yoon Hi Cho, Michelle Marion Jack","doi":"10.1111/cen.70214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate methods used to assess individual iodine status in infants under 2 years of age and to examine their clinical utility in relation to thyroid dysfunction across different clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The protocol was registered on PROSPERO and followed PRISMA guidelines. Five databases and grey literature were searched, with backward and forward citation searching. Studies were independently screened, extracted, and appraised by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was the most used method (n = 26), with significant heterogeneity. UIC and breast milk iodine concentration (BMIC) reflected iodine excess, including in cases of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and were associated with abnormal thyroid function tests in known exposure scenarios in some studies. Prematurity was a key modifier of iodine handling and thyroid response. In CH due to iodine deficiency, maternal UIC was a better indicator than infant UIC. Measurement timing, infant age and health status were significant confounders. Thyroglobulin (Tg) showed associations with iodine exposure, serum iodine, and thyroid dysfunction, but its relationship with infant UIC remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No single method reliably assesses iodine status in individual infants. Interpretation of iodine biomarkers should consider clinical context, gestational age, timing of measurement, and exposure history. A multi-modal, context-specific approach integrating iodine measures and thyroid function testing is recommended. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish age- and gestation-specific reference ranges and to refine clinical interpretation of assessment methods, including novel markers of iodine status.</p>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.70214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate methods used to assess individual iodine status in infants under 2 years of age and to examine their clinical utility in relation to thyroid dysfunction across different clinical contexts.

Design: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO and followed PRISMA guidelines. Five databases and grey literature were searched, with backward and forward citation searching. Studies were independently screened, extracted, and appraised by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.

Results: Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was the most used method (n = 26), with significant heterogeneity. UIC and breast milk iodine concentration (BMIC) reflected iodine excess, including in cases of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and were associated with abnormal thyroid function tests in known exposure scenarios in some studies. Prematurity was a key modifier of iodine handling and thyroid response. In CH due to iodine deficiency, maternal UIC was a better indicator than infant UIC. Measurement timing, infant age and health status were significant confounders. Thyroglobulin (Tg) showed associations with iodine exposure, serum iodine, and thyroid dysfunction, but its relationship with infant UIC remains unclear.

Conclusions: No single method reliably assesses iodine status in individual infants. Interpretation of iodine biomarkers should consider clinical context, gestational age, timing of measurement, and exposure history. A multi-modal, context-specific approach integrating iodine measures and thyroid function testing is recommended. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish age- and gestation-specific reference ranges and to refine clinical interpretation of assessment methods, including novel markers of iodine status.

个体碘状态测量在甲状腺功能异常婴儿中的临床应用:系统综述。
目的:评价用于评估2岁以下婴儿个体碘状态的方法,并检查其在不同临床背景下与甲状腺功能障碍相关的临床效用。设计:该方案已在PROSPERO上注册,并遵循PRISMA指南。检索5个数据库和灰色文献,采用逆向和正向引文检索。研究由两位审稿人独立筛选、提取和评价,分歧由第三位审稿人解决。结果:31项研究符合纳入标准。尿碘浓度(UIC)是最常用的方法(n = 26),但存在显著的异质性。UIC和母乳碘浓度(BMIC)反映了碘过量,包括在先天性甲状腺功能减退(CH)的情况下,并且在一些研究中与已知暴露情况下的异常甲状腺功能测试有关。早产是碘处理和甲状腺反应的关键修饰因子。在缺碘引起的CH中,母亲UIC比婴儿UIC更好。测量时间、婴儿年龄和健康状况是显著的混杂因素。甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)与碘暴露、血清碘和甲状腺功能障碍有关,但其与婴儿UIC的关系尚不清楚。结论:没有单一的方法可靠地评估个体婴儿的碘状态。碘生物标志物的解释应考虑临床背景、胎龄、测量时间和暴露史。建议采用一种结合碘测量和甲状腺功能检测的多模式、具体情况的方法。需要进行纵向研究,以确定年龄和妊娠特异性参考范围,并改进评估方法的临床解释,包括碘状态的新标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Endocrinology
Clinical Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书