Apatinib Plus PD-1 Blockade versus Chemotherapy After Prior Immunotherapy in Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 4.5 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biologics : Targets & Therapy Pub Date : 2026-09-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BTT.S639872
Rui-Xin Li, Hong-Wei Yang, Yun-Fei Zhang, Xin-Yu Liu
{"title":"Apatinib Plus PD-1 Blockade versus Chemotherapy After Prior Immunotherapy in Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Rui-Xin Li, Hong-Wei Yang, Yun-Fei Zhang, Xin-Yu Liu","doi":"10.2147/BTT.S639872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes and safety of apatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma previously exposed to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort included 117 adults with HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma treated after discontinuation of an ICI-containing regimen. 59 patients received apatinib plus PD-1 blockade (AP group) and 58 received single-agent chemotherapy (CT group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and prespecified sensitivity analyses were used to assess robustness to measured confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ORR was numerically higher in the AP group than in the CT group (20.3% vs 8.6%, <i>P</i>=0.072). The DCR was significantly higher in AP group (71.2% vs 36.2%, <i>P</i><0.001). Among the responders, median DoR was 5.2 months in the AP group and 2.6 months in the CT group (<i>P</i><0.001). Median PFS was 4.5 months in AP group and 2.8 months in CT group (HR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.88, <i>P</i>=0.008). Median OS was 11.3 and 6.4 months, respectively (HR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.83, <i>P</i>=0.004). Multivariable Cox and stabilized IPTW analyses yielded directionally consistent survival associations (IPTW: OS HR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.79; PFS HR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.85). Any-grade TRAEs occurred in 86.4% and 91.4% of patients in AP and CT group, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 39.0% and 55.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Apatinib plus PD-1 blockade was associated with longer survival and greater disease control than single-agent chemotherapy. Given the single-center retrospective design, limited sample size, treatment heterogeneity, incomplete biomarker characterization, and potential residual confounding, these findings are hypothesis-generating, do not establish causality, and require prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9025,"journal":{"name":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","volume":"20 ","pages":"639872"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S639872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes and safety of apatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma previously exposed to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included 117 adults with HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma treated after discontinuation of an ICI-containing regimen. 59 patients received apatinib plus PD-1 blockade (AP group) and 58 received single-agent chemotherapy (CT group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression, stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and prespecified sensitivity analyses were used to assess robustness to measured confounding.

Results: ORR was numerically higher in the AP group than in the CT group (20.3% vs 8.6%, P=0.072). The DCR was significantly higher in AP group (71.2% vs 36.2%, P<0.001). Among the responders, median DoR was 5.2 months in the AP group and 2.6 months in the CT group (P<0.001). Median PFS was 4.5 months in AP group and 2.8 months in CT group (HR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.39-0.88, P=0.008). Median OS was 11.3 and 6.4 months, respectively (HR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.83, P=0.004). Multivariable Cox and stabilized IPTW analyses yielded directionally consistent survival associations (IPTW: OS HR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.79; PFS HR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.85). Any-grade TRAEs occurred in 86.4% and 91.4% of patients in AP and CT group, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 39.0% and 55.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: Apatinib plus PD-1 blockade was associated with longer survival and greater disease control than single-agent chemotherapy. Given the single-center retrospective design, limited sample size, treatment heterogeneity, incomplete biomarker characterization, and potential residual confounding, these findings are hypothesis-generating, do not establish causality, and require prospective validation.

阿帕替尼加PD-1阻滞剂与既往免疫治疗后化疗:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:比较阿帕替尼加程序性死亡-1 (PD-1)阻断与单药化疗对先前暴露于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的晚期胃或胃食管交界处(G/GEJ)腺癌患者的临床结局和安全性。方法:该单中心回顾性队列包括117例her2阴性晚期G/GEJ腺癌患者,他们在停止含ici治疗后接受了治疗。59例患者接受阿帕替尼联合PD-1阻断治疗(AP组),58例患者接受单药化疗(CT组)。主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、缓解持续时间(DoR)和治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox回归分析生存率,使用稳定治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)和预先指定的敏感性分析评估对测量混杂因素的稳健性。结果:AP组的ORR数值高于CT组(20.3% vs 8.6%, P=0.072)。AP组DCR显著高于对照组(71.2% vs 36.2%, PPP=0.008)。中位OS分别为11.3和6.4个月(HR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.83, P=0.004)。多变量Cox和稳定的IPTW分析得出了方向一致的生存关联(IPTW: OS HR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.79; PFS HR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.85)。AP组和CT组出现任何级别trae的比例分别为86.4%和91.4%。≥3级trae发生率分别为39.0%和55.2%。结论:与单药化疗相比,阿帕替尼联合PD-1阻断治疗具有更长的生存期和更好的疾病控制。考虑到单中心回顾性设计、有限的样本量、治疗异质性、不完整的生物标志物表征和潜在的残留混淆,这些发现是假设产生的,不能建立因果关系,需要前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biologics : Targets & Therapy
Biologics : Targets & Therapy MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书