Why are voluntary health insurance holders willing to pay tax towards public healthcare? A qualitative study from Sweden.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Linn Kullberg, Paula Blomqvist, Ulrika Winblad
{"title":"Why are voluntary health insurance holders willing to pay tax towards public healthcare? A qualitative study from Sweden.","authors":"Linn Kullberg, Paula Blomqvist, Ulrika Winblad","doi":"10.1186/s12913-026-15708-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voluntary health insurance (VHI) is increasing in many European healthcare systems, including the tax-funded public healthcare systems found in Northern Europe. As private alternatives to publicly financed health services expand, there is a risk that the willingness to pay tax towards redistributive public healthcare systems will diminish. This study investigated how employer-funded VHI holders accounted for their continued willingness to pay income tax to suppor the public healthcare system and the motivation underlying their tax compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach based on 19 semi-structured interviews with individuals holding an employer-funded VHI in Sweden was used. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings suggest a continued willingness to pay tax towards the public healthcare system among Swedes with an employer-funded VHI. The support was motivated by a moral logic and belief in the principle of equal access to health for all citizens. Respondents also expressed ambivalence about gaining faster access to care than others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These accounts suggest that the growth of employer-funded VHI does not by itself erode the willingness to fund public healthcare, and that the egalitarian principles underpinning a universal system can sustain a sense of obligation to contribute even among those who use private healthcare. The ambivalence respondents expressed indicates that contributing on egalitarian grounds and benefiting from privileged access are not easily reconciled.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15708-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Voluntary health insurance (VHI) is increasing in many European healthcare systems, including the tax-funded public healthcare systems found in Northern Europe. As private alternatives to publicly financed health services expand, there is a risk that the willingness to pay tax towards redistributive public healthcare systems will diminish. This study investigated how employer-funded VHI holders accounted for their continued willingness to pay income tax to suppor the public healthcare system and the motivation underlying their tax compliance.

Methods: A qualitative approach based on 19 semi-structured interviews with individuals holding an employer-funded VHI in Sweden was used. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: The findings suggest a continued willingness to pay tax towards the public healthcare system among Swedes with an employer-funded VHI. The support was motivated by a moral logic and belief in the principle of equal access to health for all citizens. Respondents also expressed ambivalence about gaining faster access to care than others.

Conclusion: These accounts suggest that the growth of employer-funded VHI does not by itself erode the willingness to fund public healthcare, and that the egalitarian principles underpinning a universal system can sustain a sense of obligation to contribute even among those who use private healthcare. The ambivalence respondents expressed indicates that contributing on egalitarian grounds and benefiting from privileged access are not easily reconciled.

为什么自愿健康保险持有人愿意为公共医疗缴税?一项来自瑞典的定性研究。
背景:自愿健康保险(VHI)在许多欧洲医疗保健系统中正在增加,包括在北欧发现的税收资助的公共医疗保健系统。随着私人替代公共资助的医疗服务的扩大,存在一种风险,即为再分配的公共医疗体系纳税的意愿将减弱。本研究调查了雇主资助的VHI持有人如何解释他们持续愿意支付所得税以支持公共医疗保健系统以及他们纳税合规的动机。方法:采用定性方法,对瑞典持有雇主资助的VHI的个人进行了19次半结构化访谈。访谈采用专题分析进行分析。结果:研究结果表明,在雇主资助的VHI中,瑞典人继续愿意向公共医疗保健系统纳税。这种支持的动机是一种道德逻辑和对所有公民平等获得保健的原则的信念。受访者还对比其他人更快获得护理表示矛盾心理。结论:这些说法表明,雇主资助的VHI增长本身并不会削弱为公共医疗保健提供资金的意愿,而且作为普遍制度基础的平等主义原则可以维持一种义务感,即使是在那些使用私人医疗保健的人中。受访者表达的矛盾心理表明,在平等主义基础上做出贡献和从特权访问中受益并不容易调和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书