Bacterial detection in paediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, from conventional microbiological testing to advanced molecular techniques: a scoping review.
Emilie Clifton, Damaris Condy, Helen Groves, Thomas Waterfield
{"title":"Bacterial detection in paediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, from conventional microbiological testing to advanced molecular techniques: a scoping review.","authors":"Emilie Clifton, Damaris Condy, Helen Groves, Thomas Waterfield","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2026-331063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common complication of cancer treatment and carries a risk of bacterial bloodstream infection. Current diagnostic approaches have limitations, underscoring the need for improved methods. This review maps evidence on diagnostics for bacteraemia in paediatric FN, focusing on peripheral blood cultures (BCs) in children with central venous catheters, repeat BC strategies and emerging molecular diagnostics and biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for primary research published since 2011 evaluating diagnostic techniques for bacteraemia in children with cancer and FN. Study selection was performed independently by two reviewers. Data on study characteristics, diagnostic methods and performance were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1641 records, 33 studies (8993 FN episodes) were included: biomarker assays (n=20), BC (n=7) and molecular diagnostics (n=6). Evidence for routine peripheral BC was limited and conflicting. A temporal decline in BC diagnostic yield was observed, associated with increasing contamination. Molecular diagnostics consistently detected more pathogens than conventional culture, although evidence of clinical benefit remains limited. No biomarker demonstrated sufficient accuracy for standalone use. Methodological heterogeneity limited comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BCs remain the diagnostic gold standard for bacteraemia in paediatric FN. Repeated BCs beyond 72 hours are unlikely to benefit clinically stable patients. Molecular diagnostics and biomarkers are promising adjuncts but require further evaluation through standardised prospective multicentre studies. Integrating pathogen detection with host response biomarkers should be considered to improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2026-331063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common complication of cancer treatment and carries a risk of bacterial bloodstream infection. Current diagnostic approaches have limitations, underscoring the need for improved methods. This review maps evidence on diagnostics for bacteraemia in paediatric FN, focusing on peripheral blood cultures (BCs) in children with central venous catheters, repeat BC strategies and emerging molecular diagnostics and biomarkers.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for primary research published since 2011 evaluating diagnostic techniques for bacteraemia in children with cancer and FN. Study selection was performed independently by two reviewers. Data on study characteristics, diagnostic methods and performance were extracted.
Results: Of 1641 records, 33 studies (8993 FN episodes) were included: biomarker assays (n=20), BC (n=7) and molecular diagnostics (n=6). Evidence for routine peripheral BC was limited and conflicting. A temporal decline in BC diagnostic yield was observed, associated with increasing contamination. Molecular diagnostics consistently detected more pathogens than conventional culture, although evidence of clinical benefit remains limited. No biomarker demonstrated sufficient accuracy for standalone use. Methodological heterogeneity limited comparative analysis.
Conclusion: BCs remain the diagnostic gold standard for bacteraemia in paediatric FN. Repeated BCs beyond 72 hours are unlikely to benefit clinically stable patients. Molecular diagnostics and biomarkers are promising adjuncts but require further evaluation through standardised prospective multicentre studies. Integrating pathogen detection with host response biomarkers should be considered to improve diagnostic accuracy.
发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是癌症治疗的常见并发症,具有细菌性血流感染的风险。目前的诊断方法有局限性,强调需要改进方法。本文综述了小儿FN菌血症的诊断证据,重点关注使用中心静脉导管的儿童外周血培养(BC),重复BC策略和新兴的分子诊断和生物标志物。方法:根据Joanna Briggs研究所的方法进行范围审查,并使用PRISMA-ScR(范围审查的系统审查和元分析扩展首选报告项目)清单进行报告。我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science自2011年以来发表的评估癌症和FN患儿菌血症诊断技术的主要研究。研究选择由两位评论者独立完成。提取有关研究特征、诊断方法和表现的数据。结果:在1641份记录中,包括33项研究(8993例FN发作):生物标志物测定(n=20), BC (n=7)和分子诊断(n=6)。常规外周BC的证据有限且相互矛盾。观察到BC诊断率的时间下降,与污染增加有关。分子诊断始终比传统培养检测到更多的病原体,尽管临床益处的证据仍然有限。没有生物标志物显示出单独使用的足够准确性。方法异质性限制了比较分析。结论:bc仍是诊断小儿FN菌血症的金标准。超过72小时的重复bc不太可能使临床稳定的患者受益。分子诊断和生物标志物是有希望的辅助手段,但需要通过标准化的前瞻性多中心研究进行进一步评估。应考虑将病原体检测与宿主反应生物标志物相结合,以提高诊断准确性。
期刊介绍:
Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.