Cardiac output and stroke volume dissociate during fluid loading in conscious sheep.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Terry O'Brien, Robert G Hahn
{"title":"Cardiac output and stroke volume dissociate during fluid loading in conscious sheep.","authors":"Terry O'Brien, Robert G Hahn","doi":"10.1152/ajpheart.90145.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> A fluid challenge is judged by a rise in stroke volume or cardiac output, on the twin assumptions that the two report the same physiological effect and that either reflects circulatory benefit. We tested these assumptions across a fourfold crystalloid load in conscious sheep with intact autonomic reflexes. <b>Methods.</b> We performed a secondary analysis of 26 intravenous infusions of 0.9% saline (25, 50 or 100 mL·kg-1 over 20 min) in 13 conscious splenectomized sheep, a within-animal crossover. Cardiac output, arterial and central venous pressures and blood hemoglobin were recorded and mean systemic filling pressure was estimated by the Parkin analogue. <b>Results.</b> Stroke volume and cardiac output dissociated with dose. At 100 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup> cardiac output rose +75% carried entirely by heart rate (+143%) while stroke volume fell -25%; across the crossover cardiac output and heart rate scaled with dose, whereas stroke volume showed a non-significant monotonic decline (Friedman p = 0.22). Arterial pressure was the most defended variable, held to a ~16% ceiling by a load-scaled vasodilation (resistance -35% at the highest load). The flow gains barely raised oxygen delivery, which fell 8-14% below baseline by 180 min as hemoglobin was diluted. Filling pressure rose about threefold more than blood volume at every dose. <b>Conclusions.</b> In the conscious animal a fluid-induced rise in cardiac output can be carried entirely by an autonomic, Bainbridge-type tachycardia while stroke volume falls, and need not improve oxygen delivery or arterial pressure. A favorable stroke-volume reading is not a surrogate for systemic flow, and flow for oxygen delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7692,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.90145.2026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. A fluid challenge is judged by a rise in stroke volume or cardiac output, on the twin assumptions that the two report the same physiological effect and that either reflects circulatory benefit. We tested these assumptions across a fourfold crystalloid load in conscious sheep with intact autonomic reflexes. Methods. We performed a secondary analysis of 26 intravenous infusions of 0.9% saline (25, 50 or 100 mL·kg-1 over 20 min) in 13 conscious splenectomized sheep, a within-animal crossover. Cardiac output, arterial and central venous pressures and blood hemoglobin were recorded and mean systemic filling pressure was estimated by the Parkin analogue. Results. Stroke volume and cardiac output dissociated with dose. At 100 mL·kg-1 cardiac output rose +75% carried entirely by heart rate (+143%) while stroke volume fell -25%; across the crossover cardiac output and heart rate scaled with dose, whereas stroke volume showed a non-significant monotonic decline (Friedman p = 0.22). Arterial pressure was the most defended variable, held to a ~16% ceiling by a load-scaled vasodilation (resistance -35% at the highest load). The flow gains barely raised oxygen delivery, which fell 8-14% below baseline by 180 min as hemoglobin was diluted. Filling pressure rose about threefold more than blood volume at every dose. Conclusions. In the conscious animal a fluid-induced rise in cardiac output can be carried entirely by an autonomic, Bainbridge-type tachycardia while stroke volume falls, and need not improve oxygen delivery or arterial pressure. A favorable stroke-volume reading is not a surrogate for systemic flow, and flow for oxygen delivery.

意识清醒的绵羊在液体负荷期间心排血量和脑卒中容积分离。
背景。液体挑战是通过中风量或心输出量的增加来判断的,这是基于两种假设,即两者报告相同的生理效应,其中一种反映循环益处。我们在具有完整自主神经反射的有意识的羊身上测试了这些假设。方法。我们进行了二次分析,对13只有意识的脾切除羊进行了26次静脉输注0.9%生理盐水(25、50或100 mL·kg-1,超过20分钟),这是一种动物间交叉实验。记录心输出量、动脉和中心静脉压和血红蛋白,并通过Parkin类似物估计平均全身充血压。结果。脑卒中量和心输出量随剂量分离。100 mL·kg-1时心输出量增加+75%,完全由心率携带(+143%),而每搏量下降-25%;在整个交叉试验中,心输出量和心率随剂量呈比例变化,而脑卒中容量呈非显著性单调下降(Friedman p = 0.22)。动脉压是最受保护的变量,通过按负荷缩放的血管舒张保持在16%的上限(最高负荷时阻力-35%)。由于血红蛋白被稀释,血流量的增加几乎没有提高供氧量,在180分钟内比基线下降了8-14%。在每一次剂量下,充血压力的增长是血容量的三倍。结论。在清醒的动物中,液体引起的心输出量上升可以完全由自主的班桥型心动过速来完成,而搏量下降,无需改善供氧或动脉压。良好的笔划容积读数不能代替全身流量,也不能代替氧气输送。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology publishes original investigations, reviews and perspectives on the physiology of the heart, vasculature, and lymphatics. These articles include experimental and theoretical studies of cardiovascular function at all levels of organization ranging from the intact and integrative animal and organ function to the cellular, subcellular, and molecular levels. The journal embraces new descriptions of these functions and their control systems, as well as their basis in biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, and cell biology. Preference is given to research that provides significant new mechanistic physiological insights that determine the performance of the normal and abnormal heart and circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书