Variables associated with variations in compulsory community treatment by health districts: A meta-regression analysis across four Australian jurisdictions.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Steve Kisely, Claudia Bull, Tessa Zirnsak, Vrinda Edan, Sharon Lawn, Edwina Light, Chris Maylea, Christopher James Ryan, Puneet Sansanwal, Penelope Weller, Lisa Brophy
{"title":"Variables associated with variations in compulsory community treatment by health districts: A meta-regression analysis across four Australian jurisdictions.","authors":"Steve Kisely, Claudia Bull, Tessa Zirnsak, Vrinda Edan, Sharon Lawn, Edwina Light, Chris Maylea, Christopher James Ryan, Puneet Sansanwal, Penelope Weller, Lisa Brophy","doi":"10.1177/00048674261489461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of compulsory community treatment in Australia varies widely within, and across, jurisdictions for reasons that are not fully understood. This study, therefore, used meta-regression to explore possible explanations for this variation in the following four Australian states: Queensland, South Australia, New South Wales and Victoria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aggregated administrative data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for 2018 were analysed, encompassing 402,060 individuals in contact with community mental health services. Meta-regression using logit-transformed proportions was employed to assess associations between compulsory community treatment rates and district-level sociodemographic variables, including age, sex, marital status, region of birth and metropolitan residence. Workforce data were also examined in New South Wales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compulsory community treatment use varied significantly by jurisdiction and by health district within jurisdictions. Higher rates were associated with districts having more individuals aged 25-44 years, males (in South Australia), metropolitan residents, and those born outside Oceania. These associations persisted after adjustment. There was no statistically significant association between workforce levels and compulsory community treatment use in New South Wales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that sociodemographic factors such as age, sex and place of residence or birth may explain some of the variation in compulsory community treatment use between health districts. The influence of sociodemographic variables and geographical location in influencing compulsory community treatment use at the health district level needs further investigation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12624000153516).</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674261489461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261489461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of compulsory community treatment in Australia varies widely within, and across, jurisdictions for reasons that are not fully understood. This study, therefore, used meta-regression to explore possible explanations for this variation in the following four Australian states: Queensland, South Australia, New South Wales and Victoria.

Methods: Aggregated administrative data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for 2018 were analysed, encompassing 402,060 individuals in contact with community mental health services. Meta-regression using logit-transformed proportions was employed to assess associations between compulsory community treatment rates and district-level sociodemographic variables, including age, sex, marital status, region of birth and metropolitan residence. Workforce data were also examined in New South Wales.

Results: Compulsory community treatment use varied significantly by jurisdiction and by health district within jurisdictions. Higher rates were associated with districts having more individuals aged 25-44 years, males (in South Australia), metropolitan residents, and those born outside Oceania. These associations persisted after adjustment. There was no statistically significant association between workforce levels and compulsory community treatment use in New South Wales.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that sociodemographic factors such as age, sex and place of residence or birth may explain some of the variation in compulsory community treatment use between health districts. The influence of sociodemographic variables and geographical location in influencing compulsory community treatment use at the health district level needs further investigation.

Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12624000153516).

与卫生区强制社区治疗变化相关的变量:澳大利亚四个司法管辖区的元回归分析。
目的:澳大利亚强制社区治疗的使用在司法管辖区内和跨司法管辖区差异很大,原因尚不完全清楚。因此,本研究使用元回归来探讨澳大利亚以下四个州的这种差异的可能解释:昆士兰、南澳大利亚、新南威尔士州和维多利亚州。方法:分析了澳大利亚健康与福利研究所2018年的综合行政数据,其中包括与社区精神卫生服务接触的402,060人。采用对数转换比例的元回归方法评估社区强制治疗率与区级社会人口学变量(包括年龄、性别、婚姻状况、出生地区和居住城市)之间的关系。新南威尔士州的劳动力数据也进行了调查。结果:不同司法管辖区和辖区内不同卫生区强制社区治疗的使用差异显著。较高的发病率与年龄在25-44岁、男性(在南澳大利亚)、大都市居民和出生在大洋洲以外的人较多的地区有关。这些关联在调整后仍然存在。在新南威尔士州,劳动力水平和强制社区治疗使用之间没有统计学上的显著关联。结论:我们的研究结果表明,年龄、性别、居住地或出生地等社会人口因素可能解释了卫生区之间强制性社区治疗使用的一些差异。社会人口变量和地理位置对卫生区强制社区治疗使用的影响有待进一步调查。注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(https://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12624000153516)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书