Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: Evaluating Value Across the Appendicitis Care Episode and Risk of Malignancy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Araceli Cuaranta, Michael Abdelmasseh, Arslan Iqbal, Errington Thompson, Robert Finley, Barbara Payne, Alexei Gorka, Jonathan Willis, Vineela Kadiyala, Juan Sanabria
{"title":"Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: Evaluating Value Across the Appendicitis Care Episode and Risk of Malignancy.","authors":"Araceli Cuaranta, Michael Abdelmasseh, Arslan Iqbal, Errington Thompson, Robert Finley, Barbara Payne, Alexei Gorka, Jonathan Willis, Vineela Kadiyala, Juan Sanabria","doi":"10.1177/00031348261493526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionMore than 250,000 appendectomies are performed annually in the US, with perforated appendicitis associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization. This study evaluates value across the appendicitis care episode within a health network, focusing on the impact of patient factors and disease severity on treatment strategies, outcomes, and cost.MethodsAdult patients were identified from the Health Network System data warehouse, with pathology reports reviewed for confirmation. Quality metrics included postoperative complications (PCs), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission (RA), and textbook outcome (TB). Cost was assessed using total charges (TCs) for the index admission. Perforated appendicitis was managed with percutaneous drainage and intravenous antibiotics, followed by interval appendectomy when appropriate. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed.ResultsAmong 1637 appendectomies, 95% were performed using minimally invasive techniques (3% conversion, 2% open). Most patients were <50 years (75%; mean age 30.5 ± 9.1), while 25% were ≥50 years (mean age 61.0 ± 8.7), with higher comorbidity burden and smoking prevalence (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Outcomes compared favorably with national benchmarks, demonstrating lower PC, LOS, and RA. In perforated appendicitis, staged management showed a trend toward higher value compared with observation alone. Patients ≥50 years had higher rates of malignancy (3.9% vs 1.7%) and perforation (20.7% vs 7.1%; <i>P</i> < 0.05). Both age and perforation independently predicted malignancy.ConclusionsHigh-value appendicitis care is driven by risk stratification and appropriate treatment selection. Older age and perforation identify patients at increased risk for adverse outcomes and malignancy, supporting tailored, pathway-based management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261493526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261493526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionMore than 250,000 appendectomies are performed annually in the US, with perforated appendicitis associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization. This study evaluates value across the appendicitis care episode within a health network, focusing on the impact of patient factors and disease severity on treatment strategies, outcomes, and cost.MethodsAdult patients were identified from the Health Network System data warehouse, with pathology reports reviewed for confirmation. Quality metrics included postoperative complications (PCs), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission (RA), and textbook outcome (TB). Cost was assessed using total charges (TCs) for the index admission. Perforated appendicitis was managed with percutaneous drainage and intravenous antibiotics, followed by interval appendectomy when appropriate. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed.ResultsAmong 1637 appendectomies, 95% were performed using minimally invasive techniques (3% conversion, 2% open). Most patients were <50 years (75%; mean age 30.5 ± 9.1), while 25% were ≥50 years (mean age 61.0 ± 8.7), with higher comorbidity burden and smoking prevalence (P < 0.05). Outcomes compared favorably with national benchmarks, demonstrating lower PC, LOS, and RA. In perforated appendicitis, staged management showed a trend toward higher value compared with observation alone. Patients ≥50 years had higher rates of malignancy (3.9% vs 1.7%) and perforation (20.7% vs 7.1%; P < 0.05). Both age and perforation independently predicted malignancy.ConclusionsHigh-value appendicitis care is driven by risk stratification and appropriate treatment selection. Older age and perforation identify patients at increased risk for adverse outcomes and malignancy, supporting tailored, pathway-based management strategies.

老年人急性阑尾炎:评估阑尾炎护理期和恶性肿瘤风险的价值。
在美国,每年有超过25万例阑尾切除术,穿孔阑尾炎与发病率和资源利用率的增加有关。本研究评估了医疗网络中阑尾炎护理事件的价值,重点关注患者因素和疾病严重程度对治疗策略、结果和成本的影响。方法从卫生网络系统数据仓库中确定成年患者,并查阅病理报告进行确认。质量指标包括术后并发症(PCs)、住院时间(LOS)、30天再入院(RA)和教科书结果(TB)。使用指数入场的总收费(TCs)来评估成本。穿孔性阑尾炎采用经皮引流和静脉注射抗生素治疗,适当时进行间歇阑尾切除术。进行单变量和多变量分析。结果在1637例阑尾切除术中,95%采用微创技术(3%转换,2%开放)。多数患者P < 0.05)。结果与国家基准比较有利,显示较低的PC, LOS和RA。在穿孔阑尾炎中,分期治疗比单纯观察有更高的价值。≥50岁患者的恶性肿瘤发生率(3.9% vs 1.7%)和穿孔发生率(20.7% vs 7.1%; P < 0.05)较高。年龄和穿孔均可独立预测恶性肿瘤。结论高价值阑尾炎的护理需要风险分层和合理的治疗选择。年龄较大和穿孔可识别不良结局和恶性肿瘤风险增加的患者,支持量身定制的基于途径的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书