The Impact of Explanation Characteristics on the Effects of Recommender Systems Explanations

IF 30.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Kathrin Wardatzky, Oana Inel, Luca Rossetto, Athina Kyriakou, Abraham Bernstein
{"title":"The Impact of Explanation Characteristics on the Effects of Recommender Systems Explanations","authors":"Kathrin Wardatzky, Oana Inel, Luca Rossetto, Athina Kyriakou, Abraham Bernstein","doi":"10.1145/3856207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There seems to be a consensus that adding explanations to AI systems, such as recommender systems, can have positive effects, such as increasing a user’s trust, the transparency of the system, or the efficiency of a decision-making process. It is to this date unclear, though, how an explanation needs to be designed to evoke these effects. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature survey of 180 articles. The corpus was created by first querying six literature databases with predefined keyword searches and sorting the retrieved articles by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then extracted and categorized the explanation characteristics, such as their modalities and content, as well as the effects measured in user evaluations. Finally, we combine both dimensions to analyze the impact of the characteristics on the effects. The findings suggest that it is not possible to make general statements about the effects of explanations. Instead, the measured effects vary in different contexts, and the results depend on whether the evaluated explanation was compared to another explanation or to a system without explanation. Our survey identifies and highlights research gaps and promising areas for future work, such as the effects of non-local explanations on the user.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":30.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3856207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There seems to be a consensus that adding explanations to AI systems, such as recommender systems, can have positive effects, such as increasing a user’s trust, the transparency of the system, or the efficiency of a decision-making process. It is to this date unclear, though, how an explanation needs to be designed to evoke these effects. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature survey of 180 articles. The corpus was created by first querying six literature databases with predefined keyword searches and sorting the retrieved articles by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then extracted and categorized the explanation characteristics, such as their modalities and content, as well as the effects measured in user evaluations. Finally, we combine both dimensions to analyze the impact of the characteristics on the effects. The findings suggest that it is not possible to make general statements about the effects of explanations. Instead, the measured effects vary in different contexts, and the results depend on whether the evaluated explanation was compared to another explanation or to a system without explanation. Our survey identifies and highlights research gaps and promising areas for future work, such as the effects of non-local explanations on the user.
解释特征对推荐系统解释效果的影响
人们似乎一致认为,在推荐系统等人工智能系统中添加解释可以产生积极的影响,例如增加用户的信任、系统的透明度或决策过程的效率。然而,到目前为止,还不清楚需要如何设计一个解释来引起这些影响。为了解决这一差距,我们对180篇文章进行了系统的文献调查。该语料库首先通过预先定义的关键词查询六个文献数据库,并根据包含和排除标准对检索到的文章进行排序。然后,我们提取并分类了解释特征,例如它们的形式和内容,以及在用户评估中测量的效果。最后,我们结合两个维度来分析特征对效果的影响。研究结果表明,不可能对解释的效果做出一般性的陈述。相反,测量的效果在不同的背景下是不同的,结果取决于评估的解释是与另一种解释比较,还是与没有解释的系统比较。我们的调查确定并强调了未来工作的研究差距和有希望的领域,例如非本地解释对用户的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
0.60%
发文量
372
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods. ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书