Sequential intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel after BCG failure non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Oncological outcomes and safety profile.

IF 1.2
Albane Massiet du Biest, Evanguelos Xylinas, Pierre-Etienne Gabriel
{"title":"Sequential intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel after BCG failure non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Oncological outcomes and safety profile.","authors":"Albane Massiet du Biest, Evanguelos Xylinas, Pierre-Etienne Gabriel","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sequential intravesical instillation of gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has emerging evidence as a bladder-sparing approach in BCG failure non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aimed to provide additional real-world data by reporting the oncological outcomes and safety profile of Gem/Doce in BCG-failure NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-arm monocentric study including all consecutive patients treated with Gem/Doce for BCG-failure NMIBC between 2023 and 2025. Oncological outcomes included overall recurrence-free survival (RFS), high-grade (HG) RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), cystectomy-free survival (CFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were included. Median number of instillations was 10 (IQR 6-14). After a median follow-up of 12.6 months (11.6-19.7), 10 (21.3%) patients experienced disease recurrence or progression, including 5 (10.6%) with HG recurrence and 1 (2.1%) with muscle-invasive disease. Three (6.4%) patients underwent radical cystectomy, three (6.4%) developed metastases, and three (6.4%) died, including one (2.1%) from bladder cancer. 1-year RFS and HG-RFS were 89.3% (80-99.8) and 94.3% (87-100). 1-year PFS, CFS, MFS, and OS were 96.8%, 95.4%, 97.9%, and 95.3%. In BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, 1-year RFS, HG-RFS and MFS were 91.4%, 95.5% and 96.4%. Among patients with systematic bladder biopsies (n=15 at 3 months and n=9 at 12 months), 4 (26.7%) were positive at 3 months and 3 (33.3%) at 12 months. AEs occurred in 70.2% (grade 1-2) and 6.4% (grade ≥3), mainly urinary frequency, urgency, and asthenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gem/Doce shows promising real-world oncological efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in BCG-failure NMIBC, although optimal surveillance strategies remain to be defined.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"103229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sequential intravesical instillation of gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has emerging evidence as a bladder-sparing approach in BCG failure non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aimed to provide additional real-world data by reporting the oncological outcomes and safety profile of Gem/Doce in BCG-failure NMIBC.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-arm monocentric study including all consecutive patients treated with Gem/Doce for BCG-failure NMIBC between 2023 and 2025. Oncological outcomes included overall recurrence-free survival (RFS), high-grade (HG) RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), cystectomy-free survival (CFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE criteria.

Results: A total of 47 patients were included. Median number of instillations was 10 (IQR 6-14). After a median follow-up of 12.6 months (11.6-19.7), 10 (21.3%) patients experienced disease recurrence or progression, including 5 (10.6%) with HG recurrence and 1 (2.1%) with muscle-invasive disease. Three (6.4%) patients underwent radical cystectomy, three (6.4%) developed metastases, and three (6.4%) died, including one (2.1%) from bladder cancer. 1-year RFS and HG-RFS were 89.3% (80-99.8) and 94.3% (87-100). 1-year PFS, CFS, MFS, and OS were 96.8%, 95.4%, 97.9%, and 95.3%. In BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, 1-year RFS, HG-RFS and MFS were 91.4%, 95.5% and 96.4%. Among patients with systematic bladder biopsies (n=15 at 3 months and n=9 at 12 months), 4 (26.7%) were positive at 3 months and 3 (33.3%) at 12 months. AEs occurred in 70.2% (grade 1-2) and 6.4% (grade ≥3), mainly urinary frequency, urgency, and asthenia.

Conclusion: Gem/Doce shows promising real-world oncological efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in BCG-failure NMIBC, although optimal surveillance strategies remain to be defined.

Level of evidence: 4:

卡介苗失败后连续膀胱注射吉西他滨-多西他赛非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌:肿瘤预后和安全性
简介:有新的证据表明,连续膀胱内灌注吉西他滨和多西他赛(Gem/Doce)作为卡介苗失败的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的膀胱保留方法。本研究旨在通过报告Gem/Doce治疗bcg衰竭NMIBC的肿瘤学结果和安全性概况,提供额外的真实数据。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性单臂单中心研究,包括所有在2023年至2025年期间连续接受Gem/Doce治疗bcg衰竭的NMIBC患者。肿瘤预后包括总无复发生存期(RFS)、高级别(HG) RFS、无进展生存期(PFS)、无膀胱切除术生存期(CFS)、无转移生存期(MFS)和总生存期(OS)。不良事件(ae)采用CTCAE标准分级。结果:共纳入47例患者。中位滴注次数为10次(IQR 6-14)。中位随访12.6个月(11.6-19.7)后,10例(21.3%)患者出现疾病复发或进展,其中HG复发5例(10.6%),肌肉侵袭性疾病1例(2.1%)。3例(6.4%)患者行根治性膀胱切除术,3例(6.4%)发生转移,3例(6.4%)死亡,其中1例(2.1%)死于膀胱癌。1年RFS和HG-RFS分别为89.3%(80 ~ 99.8)和94.3%(87 ~ 100)。1年PFS、CFS、MFS和OS分别为96.8%、95.4%、97.9%和95.3%。在bcg无应答的NMIBC中,1年RFS、HG-RFS和MFS分别为91.4%、95.5%和96.4%。在系统膀胱活检患者中(3个月时15例,12个月时9例),3个月时阳性4例(26.7%),12个月时阳性3例(33.3%)。不良事件发生率分别为70.2%(1-2级)和6.4%(≥3级),主要为尿频、尿急和尿虚。结论:Gem/Doce在bcg失败的NMIBC中显示出有希望的真实肿瘤疗效和可接受的安全性,尽管最佳监测策略仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书