Pauline Sartori, Charlotte Chappet, Mélanie Deronzier, Heidi Deswaziere, Léa Charrier, Clara Blanc, Léo Pomar
{"title":"Understanding barriers to human cytomegalovirus prevention: a mixed-methods study on hygiene recommendations for pregnant women","authors":"Pauline Sartori, Charlotte Chappet, Mélanie Deronzier, Heidi Deswaziere, Léa Charrier, Clara Blanc, Léo Pomar","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2026.102408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Human Cytomegalovirus is the most common congenital infection worldwide, yet recommended hygiene measures to prevent maternal infection are difficult to implement consistently during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite their effectiveness, adherence to hygiene recommendations remains suboptimal, suggesting a gap between recommendations and women’s everyday realities.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the real‑world applicability of hygiene recommendations for the prevention of cytomegalovirus during pregnancy in French-speaking Switzerland and to explore perceived barriers to their implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed‑methods design was used. Quantitative data were drawn from two cross‑sectional surveys conducted among pregnant or postpartum women (n = 834) and perinatal healthcare professionals (n = 341) to identify recommendations perceived as difficult to apply. These findings informed semi‑structured interviews with 12 mothers of young children, which explored barriers and facilitators to adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Quantitative analyses identified avoiding contact with children’s bodily fluids and ensuring partner adherence as the most challenging recommendations. Qualitative findings confirmed these challenges and identified three key barriers: insufficient and unclear information, high mental load linked to caregiving responsibilities, and recommendations perceived as only partially feasible in everyday life. Participants emphasised the need for clearer, pragmatic guidance and shared family involvement to support implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings highlight a misalignment between hygiene recommendations and women’s experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies should prioritise clearer and actionable recommendations, improved professional training, and family-centred communication that avoids overburdening pregnant women. Integrating digital tools, prenatal education, and public awareness initiatives may enhance adherence and support more equitable prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"39 5","pages":"Article 102408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519226002519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Problem
Human Cytomegalovirus is the most common congenital infection worldwide, yet recommended hygiene measures to prevent maternal infection are difficult to implement consistently during pregnancy.
Background
Despite their effectiveness, adherence to hygiene recommendations remains suboptimal, suggesting a gap between recommendations and women’s everyday realities.
Aim
This study aimed to assess the real‑world applicability of hygiene recommendations for the prevention of cytomegalovirus during pregnancy in French-speaking Switzerland and to explore perceived barriers to their implementation.
Methods
A mixed‑methods design was used. Quantitative data were drawn from two cross‑sectional surveys conducted among pregnant or postpartum women (n = 834) and perinatal healthcare professionals (n = 341) to identify recommendations perceived as difficult to apply. These findings informed semi‑structured interviews with 12 mothers of young children, which explored barriers and facilitators to adherence.
Findings
Quantitative analyses identified avoiding contact with children’s bodily fluids and ensuring partner adherence as the most challenging recommendations. Qualitative findings confirmed these challenges and identified three key barriers: insufficient and unclear information, high mental load linked to caregiving responsibilities, and recommendations perceived as only partially feasible in everyday life. Participants emphasised the need for clearer, pragmatic guidance and shared family involvement to support implementation.
Discussion
The findings highlight a misalignment between hygiene recommendations and women’s experiences.
Conclusion
Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies should prioritise clearer and actionable recommendations, improved professional training, and family-centred communication that avoids overburdening pregnant women. Integrating digital tools, prenatal education, and public awareness initiatives may enhance adherence and support more equitable prevention.
期刊介绍:
Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews.
Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.