Point-of-care ultrasound for left ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation in the emergency department.

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2026-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s43678-026-01259-3
Sophia-Maria Giannakakis, Ian Stiell, Michael Y Woo, Angeline Law, Habibat Garuba, Monica Taljaard, Jeffrey J Perry
{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound for left ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation in the emergency department.","authors":"Sophia-Maria Giannakakis, Ian Stiell, Michael Y Woo, Angeline Law, Habibat Garuba, Monica Taljaard, Jeffrey J Perry","doi":"10.1007/s43678-026-01259-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a knowledge gap regarding reliability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) assessing left ventricular function for patients in acute rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL) in the emergency department (ED). We sought to evaluate interrater agreement of POCUS severely reduced left ventricular function in this ED population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a health records review of adult patients who presented with rapid AF/AFL, heart rate above 110, to a tertiary care hospital ED. POCUS scans archived by ED physicians were interpreted by two cardiologists and one ED POCUS expert. Left ventricular function was categorized as either 'normal or non-severely reduced' and 'severely reduced' function. Interrater agreement analysis was performed using Cohen's kappa with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 332 ED patients with acute rapid AF/AFL during our study period, of which 128(38%) had POCUS assessing left ventricular function. All archived POCUS scans (100/128) were used for agreement analysis. We found a moderate level of agreement between cardiologists and ED POCUS expert (k = 0.63 CI 95% 0.43-0.82) with an 88% raw agreement (74% normal or non-severe, 14% severely reduced). Fair agreement was found between cardiologists and ED physicians (k = 0.34 CI 95% 0.10-0.58) 85% raw agreement (80% normal or non-severe, 5% severely reduced).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with rapid AF/AFL evaluated in the ED, one-third had POCUS left ventricular function assessments. ED physicians and ED POCUS expert agreement with cardiologists ranged from fair to moderate when distinguishing severely reduced left ventricular function from normal or non-severely reduced function in patients with rapid AF/AFL. These findings are a first step in demonstrating the reliability of POCUS left ventricular function assessment in patients presenting with rapid AF/AFL to the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-026-01259-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a knowledge gap regarding reliability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) assessing left ventricular function for patients in acute rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL) in the emergency department (ED). We sought to evaluate interrater agreement of POCUS severely reduced left ventricular function in this ED population.

Methods: We conducted a health records review of adult patients who presented with rapid AF/AFL, heart rate above 110, to a tertiary care hospital ED. POCUS scans archived by ED physicians were interpreted by two cardiologists and one ED POCUS expert. Left ventricular function was categorized as either 'normal or non-severely reduced' and 'severely reduced' function. Interrater agreement analysis was performed using Cohen's kappa with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: We identified 332 ED patients with acute rapid AF/AFL during our study period, of which 128(38%) had POCUS assessing left ventricular function. All archived POCUS scans (100/128) were used for agreement analysis. We found a moderate level of agreement between cardiologists and ED POCUS expert (k = 0.63 CI 95% 0.43-0.82) with an 88% raw agreement (74% normal or non-severe, 14% severely reduced). Fair agreement was found between cardiologists and ED physicians (k = 0.34 CI 95% 0.10-0.58) 85% raw agreement (80% normal or non-severe, 5% severely reduced).

Conclusion: Among patients with rapid AF/AFL evaluated in the ED, one-third had POCUS left ventricular function assessments. ED physicians and ED POCUS expert agreement with cardiologists ranged from fair to moderate when distinguishing severely reduced left ventricular function from normal or non-severely reduced function in patients with rapid AF/AFL. These findings are a first step in demonstrating the reliability of POCUS left ventricular function assessment in patients presenting with rapid AF/AFL to the ED.

急诊房颤患者左心室功能的即时超声诊断
导读:关于急诊(ED)急性快速心房颤动(AF)或扑动(AFL)患者的即时超声(POCUS)评估左心室功能的可靠性存在知识缺口。我们试图评估POCUS在ED人群中严重降低左心室功能的相互一致性。方法:我们对三级医院急诊科出现快速AF/AFL、心率超过110的成年患者进行了健康记录回顾。急诊科医生存档的POCUS扫描由两名心脏病专家和一名急诊科POCUS专家进行解读。左心室功能分为“正常或非严重功能减退”和“严重功能减退”。采用Cohen's kappa进行一致性分析,置信区间为95%。结果:在我们的研究期间,我们确定了332例急性快速AF/AFL ED患者,其中128例(38%)采用POCUS评估左心室功能。所有存档的POCUS扫描(100/128)用于一致性分析。我们发现心脏病专家和ED POCUS专家之间有中等程度的一致性(k = 0.63 CI 95% 0.43-0.82), 88%的原始一致性(74%正常或不严重,14%严重降低)。心脏科医生和急诊科医生的结果基本一致(k = 0.34 CI 95% 0.10-0.58), 85%基本一致(80%正常或不严重,5%严重降低)。结论:在ED评估的快速AF/AFL患者中,三分之一的患者进行了POCUS左心室功能评估。在区分急性房颤/AFL患者的严重左心室功能下降与正常或非严重左心室功能下降时,ED医生和ED POCUS专家与心脏病专家的意见从一般到中等不等。这些发现是证明POCUS左心室功能评估在急诊科快速房颤/AFL患者中的可靠性的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书