Enhancing Patient Throughput Through Front-end Redesign and Alternate Care Space Implementation in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2026-09-28 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000923
Cortney C Braund, Bernadette K Johnson, Shaela Moen, Sandra Spencer, Travis Justilian, Suzanne Sternberg, Kristin Vickrey, Matthew Cerchie, Candise Dunham, Nidhya Navanandan
{"title":"Enhancing Patient Throughput Through Front-end Redesign and Alternate Care Space Implementation in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Cortney C Braund, Bernadette K Johnson, Shaela Moen, Sandra Spencer, Travis Justilian, Suzanne Sternberg, Kristin Vickrey, Matthew Cerchie, Candise Dunham, Nidhya Navanandan","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department (ED) crowding remains a persistent national challenge, contributing to delays in care, increased length of stay (LOS), and higher rates of patients leaving without being seen (LWBS). Front-end strategies improve throughput and reduce LWBS by enabling earlier assessment and disposition. Building on prior efforts, this quality improvement initiative aimed to enhance patient flow for low-acuity pediatric patients by leveraging alternative care spaces to reduce roomed-to-disposition time, LOS, and LWBS while preserving capacity for higher acuity care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This initiative occurred in a high-volume pediatric ED using a front-end, physician-driven \"Intake\" model. To improve efficiency and throughput, the team introduced an alternate care space. Additional interventions included role clarification, workflow standardization, and targeted education for physicians and staff to reduce roomed-to-disposition time for Intake patients by 10% within 4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Roomed-to-disposition time for all Intake patients decreased by 15% (from 88 to 75 min), whereas a specific group of low-intervention patients experienced a 49% reduction. LOS for all Intake patients decreased by 30%, and by 48% for low-intervention patients (from 286 to 148 min). Additional improvements included a 49% reduction in LWBS and a 37% decrease in arrival-to-provider time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our quality improvement initiative demonstrated that a thoughtful reorganization of existing ED Intake processes, without additional staffing or physical expansion, can meaningfully improve patient throughput, provider efficiency, and overall ED performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"11 5","pages":"e923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) crowding remains a persistent national challenge, contributing to delays in care, increased length of stay (LOS), and higher rates of patients leaving without being seen (LWBS). Front-end strategies improve throughput and reduce LWBS by enabling earlier assessment and disposition. Building on prior efforts, this quality improvement initiative aimed to enhance patient flow for low-acuity pediatric patients by leveraging alternative care spaces to reduce roomed-to-disposition time, LOS, and LWBS while preserving capacity for higher acuity care.

Methods: This initiative occurred in a high-volume pediatric ED using a front-end, physician-driven "Intake" model. To improve efficiency and throughput, the team introduced an alternate care space. Additional interventions included role clarification, workflow standardization, and targeted education for physicians and staff to reduce roomed-to-disposition time for Intake patients by 10% within 4 months.

Results: Roomed-to-disposition time for all Intake patients decreased by 15% (from 88 to 75 min), whereas a specific group of low-intervention patients experienced a 49% reduction. LOS for all Intake patients decreased by 30%, and by 48% for low-intervention patients (from 286 to 148 min). Additional improvements included a 49% reduction in LWBS and a 37% decrease in arrival-to-provider time.

Conclusions: Our quality improvement initiative demonstrated that a thoughtful reorganization of existing ED Intake processes, without additional staffing or physical expansion, can meaningfully improve patient throughput, provider efficiency, and overall ED performance.

通过儿科急诊科的前端重新设计和替代护理空间实施提高患者吞吐量:一项质量改进倡议。
简介:急诊科(ED)拥挤仍然是一个持续存在的国家挑战,导致护理延误,住院时间延长(LOS),以及更高的病人离开没有看到(LWBS)率。前端策略通过支持更早的评估和处理来提高吞吐量并减少LWBS。在先前努力的基础上,这一质量改进计划旨在通过利用替代护理空间来减少从病房到处置时间、LOS和LWBS,同时保留更高的视力护理能力,从而提高低视力儿科患者的患者流量。方法:这一举措发生在一个使用前端、医生驱动的“摄入”模式的大容量儿科急诊科。为了提高效率和吞吐量,团队引入了一个替代的护理空间。其他干预措施包括角色澄清、工作流程标准化以及对医生和工作人员进行有针对性的教育,以在4个月内将入院患者的住院时间缩短10%。结果:所有入院患者从入院到出院的时间减少了15%(从88分钟减少到75分钟),而一组特定的低干预患者减少了49%。所有服药患者的LOS降低了30%,低干预患者的LOS降低了48%(从286分钟降至148分钟)。其他改进包括LWBS减少49%,到达供应商时间减少37%。结论:我们的质量改进倡议表明,在不增加人员或物理扩张的情况下,对现有急诊科入院流程进行深思熟虑的重组,可以显著提高患者吞吐量、提供者效率和急诊科的整体表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书