Phylogeny-guided curation reveals widespread misannotation of Asgard archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences in public databases.

IF 6.4 Q1 ECOLOGY
ISME communications Pub Date : 2026-09-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycag253
Agathe Struillou, Philippe Deschamps, David Moreira, Purificación López-García
{"title":"Phylogeny-guided curation reveals widespread misannotation of Asgard archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences in public databases.","authors":"Agathe Struillou, Philippe Deschamps, David Moreira, Purificación López-García","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycag253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate taxonomic assignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences is essential for the reliable interpretation of microbial community studies based on amplicon sequence data. Yet, it critically depends on the reliability of reference databases such as the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) and the SILVA ribosomal RNA database. Here, we evaluate the consistency of taxonomic annotations within the Asgardarchaeota phylum, a lineage of major evolutionary and ecological interest. Using a phylogenetically curated set of GTDB-derived 16S rRNA gene sequences, we show that most of the affiliations of these sequences were consistent with the phylogenomic placement of their corresponding metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), although a small fraction of them exhibited clear inconsistencies likely resulting from erroneous binning to MAGs. In contrast, phylogenetic analyses of SILVA-derived 16S rRNA gene sequences including curated reference sequences revealed widespread taxonomic misannotation and/or limited resolution of taxon assignment. Specifically, many sequences annotated as Odinarchaeales robustly clustered within Lokiarchaeia, Heimdallarchaeia, Hermodarchaeia, or Sifarchaeia, leading to an artificial inflation of Odinarchaeales assignments and potentially biased ecological interpretations. To mitigate these issues, we constructed a curated reference dataset of Asgardarchaeota 16S rRNA gene sequences and generated phylogenetically validated taxonomic assignments across clustered entries, providing a resource for improved classification of environmental sequences. Our results demonstrate that widely used reference databases can contain systematic annotation errors that propagate across studies and distort ecological inference. Although illustrated using Asgard archaea, these limitations are likely pervasive across understudied microbial diversity, highlighting the need for routine phylogenetic validation and systematic curation of reference datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"ycag253"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycag253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate taxonomic assignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences is essential for the reliable interpretation of microbial community studies based on amplicon sequence data. Yet, it critically depends on the reliability of reference databases such as the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) and the SILVA ribosomal RNA database. Here, we evaluate the consistency of taxonomic annotations within the Asgardarchaeota phylum, a lineage of major evolutionary and ecological interest. Using a phylogenetically curated set of GTDB-derived 16S rRNA gene sequences, we show that most of the affiliations of these sequences were consistent with the phylogenomic placement of their corresponding metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), although a small fraction of them exhibited clear inconsistencies likely resulting from erroneous binning to MAGs. In contrast, phylogenetic analyses of SILVA-derived 16S rRNA gene sequences including curated reference sequences revealed widespread taxonomic misannotation and/or limited resolution of taxon assignment. Specifically, many sequences annotated as Odinarchaeales robustly clustered within Lokiarchaeia, Heimdallarchaeia, Hermodarchaeia, or Sifarchaeia, leading to an artificial inflation of Odinarchaeales assignments and potentially biased ecological interpretations. To mitigate these issues, we constructed a curated reference dataset of Asgardarchaeota 16S rRNA gene sequences and generated phylogenetically validated taxonomic assignments across clustered entries, providing a resource for improved classification of environmental sequences. Our results demonstrate that widely used reference databases can contain systematic annotation errors that propagate across studies and distort ecological inference. Although illustrated using Asgard archaea, these limitations are likely pervasive across understudied microbial diversity, highlighting the need for routine phylogenetic validation and systematic curation of reference datasets.

系统发育引导的策展揭示了公共数据库中普遍存在的阿斯加德古菌16S rRNA基因序列的错误注释。
16S rRNA基因序列的准确分类是基于扩增子序列数据可靠解释微生物群落研究的必要条件。然而,它严重依赖于参考数据库的可靠性,如基因组分类数据库(GTDB)和SILVA核糖体RNA数据库。在这里,我们评估了Asgardarchaeota门的分类注释的一致性,这是一个主要的进化和生态兴趣的谱系。利用一组gtdb衍生的16S rRNA基因序列,我们发现这些序列的大部分隶属关系与其对应的宏基因组组装基因组(MAGs)的系统基因组定位一致,尽管其中一小部分表现出明显的不一致性,可能是由于错误地归类到MAGs。相比之下,对silva衍生的16S rRNA基因序列(包括精选的参考序列)的系统发育分析显示,广泛存在的分类错误注释和/或分类单元分配的分辨率有限。具体来说,许多被注释为Odinarchaeales的序列在Lokiarchaeia, Heimdallarchaeia, Hermodarchaeia或Sifarchaeia中密集聚集,导致odinarchaeia分配的人为膨胀和潜在的偏差生态学解释。为了解决这些问题,我们构建了asgardarchaaeota 16S rRNA基因序列的参考数据集,并在聚类条目中生成了系统发育上经过验证的分类分配,为改进环境序列分类提供了资源。我们的研究结果表明,广泛使用的参考数据库可能包含系统性的注释错误,这些错误会在研究中传播并扭曲生态推断。尽管使用Asgard古细菌进行说明,但这些局限性可能普遍存在于未充分研究的微生物多样性中,强调了常规系统发育验证和系统管理参考数据集的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书