Alex H Lee, Devesh Narayanan, Kristan Staudenmayer, Aussama K Nassar, Syed Morad Hameed
{"title":"Electronic Health Record Workflows in Acute Care Surgery: Ethnographic Study.","authors":"Alex H Lee, Devesh Narayanan, Kristan Staudenmayer, Aussama K Nassar, Syed Morad Hameed","doi":"10.2196/89846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systematic strategies to harness electronic health record (EHR) workflows, reduce redundancy, and support decision-making remain limited in acute care surgery (ACS). Understanding how EHR systems and workflows intersect with time-sensitive settings is critical to improving decision-making and outcomes in ACS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate how ACS clinicians leverage the EHR for decision-making and to identify opportunities and challenges for EHR-enabled decision support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative ethnographic study over a 6-month period, combining in-depth interviews with 15 ACS surgeons and providers and 100 hours of \"paired fieldwork\" observations spanning the entire perioperative arc by a surgical provider and an organizational sociologist. Using constructivist grounded theory, we identified the enablers, challenges, and opportunities for EHR-enabled decision-making in ACS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgeons fell into two groups: (1) those who accepted information overload as inherent to the EHR, relying on generic templates and standard attestations, and (2) others who viewed it as a problem to fix, actively correcting errors and composing individualized summaries. Ambiguity in billing requirements drove overdocumentation, resulting in \"note bloat\" that obscured high-yield information. EHR use during decision-making focused primarily on risk assessment, though navigation challenges hindered access to critical data. Forecasting key outcomes that alter management or facilitate shared decision-making was seen as valuable. Automated risk stratification, generated from live EHR data while minimizing alert fatigue, was seen as a potential solution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACS clinicians use various tactics to navigate EHR challenges and focus on high-value tasks. Streamlined risk assessment using EHR data may strengthen decision-making in critical moments, but solutions must integrate seamlessly within existing workflows to provide rapid and accurate outputs that prioritize meaningful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"14 ","pages":"e89846"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/89846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Systematic strategies to harness electronic health record (EHR) workflows, reduce redundancy, and support decision-making remain limited in acute care surgery (ACS). Understanding how EHR systems and workflows intersect with time-sensitive settings is critical to improving decision-making and outcomes in ACS.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how ACS clinicians leverage the EHR for decision-making and to identify opportunities and challenges for EHR-enabled decision support.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative ethnographic study over a 6-month period, combining in-depth interviews with 15 ACS surgeons and providers and 100 hours of "paired fieldwork" observations spanning the entire perioperative arc by a surgical provider and an organizational sociologist. Using constructivist grounded theory, we identified the enablers, challenges, and opportunities for EHR-enabled decision-making in ACS.
Results: Surgeons fell into two groups: (1) those who accepted information overload as inherent to the EHR, relying on generic templates and standard attestations, and (2) others who viewed it as a problem to fix, actively correcting errors and composing individualized summaries. Ambiguity in billing requirements drove overdocumentation, resulting in "note bloat" that obscured high-yield information. EHR use during decision-making focused primarily on risk assessment, though navigation challenges hindered access to critical data. Forecasting key outcomes that alter management or facilitate shared decision-making was seen as valuable. Automated risk stratification, generated from live EHR data while minimizing alert fatigue, was seen as a potential solution.
Conclusions: ACS clinicians use various tactics to navigate EHR challenges and focus on high-value tasks. Streamlined risk assessment using EHR data may strengthen decision-making in critical moments, but solutions must integrate seamlessly within existing workflows to provide rapid and accurate outputs that prioritize meaningful outcomes.
期刊介绍:
JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals.
Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.