Electronic Health Record Workflows in Acute Care Surgery: Ethnographic Study.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Alex H Lee, Devesh Narayanan, Kristan Staudenmayer, Aussama K Nassar, Syed Morad Hameed
{"title":"Electronic Health Record Workflows in Acute Care Surgery: Ethnographic Study.","authors":"Alex H Lee, Devesh Narayanan, Kristan Staudenmayer, Aussama K Nassar, Syed Morad Hameed","doi":"10.2196/89846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systematic strategies to harness electronic health record (EHR) workflows, reduce redundancy, and support decision-making remain limited in acute care surgery (ACS). Understanding how EHR systems and workflows intersect with time-sensitive settings is critical to improving decision-making and outcomes in ACS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate how ACS clinicians leverage the EHR for decision-making and to identify opportunities and challenges for EHR-enabled decision support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative ethnographic study over a 6-month period, combining in-depth interviews with 15 ACS surgeons and providers and 100 hours of \"paired fieldwork\" observations spanning the entire perioperative arc by a surgical provider and an organizational sociologist. Using constructivist grounded theory, we identified the enablers, challenges, and opportunities for EHR-enabled decision-making in ACS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgeons fell into two groups: (1) those who accepted information overload as inherent to the EHR, relying on generic templates and standard attestations, and (2) others who viewed it as a problem to fix, actively correcting errors and composing individualized summaries. Ambiguity in billing requirements drove overdocumentation, resulting in \"note bloat\" that obscured high-yield information. EHR use during decision-making focused primarily on risk assessment, though navigation challenges hindered access to critical data. Forecasting key outcomes that alter management or facilitate shared decision-making was seen as valuable. Automated risk stratification, generated from live EHR data while minimizing alert fatigue, was seen as a potential solution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACS clinicians use various tactics to navigate EHR challenges and focus on high-value tasks. Streamlined risk assessment using EHR data may strengthen decision-making in critical moments, but solutions must integrate seamlessly within existing workflows to provide rapid and accurate outputs that prioritize meaningful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"14 ","pages":"e89846"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/89846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systematic strategies to harness electronic health record (EHR) workflows, reduce redundancy, and support decision-making remain limited in acute care surgery (ACS). Understanding how EHR systems and workflows intersect with time-sensitive settings is critical to improving decision-making and outcomes in ACS.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how ACS clinicians leverage the EHR for decision-making and to identify opportunities and challenges for EHR-enabled decision support.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative ethnographic study over a 6-month period, combining in-depth interviews with 15 ACS surgeons and providers and 100 hours of "paired fieldwork" observations spanning the entire perioperative arc by a surgical provider and an organizational sociologist. Using constructivist grounded theory, we identified the enablers, challenges, and opportunities for EHR-enabled decision-making in ACS.

Results: Surgeons fell into two groups: (1) those who accepted information overload as inherent to the EHR, relying on generic templates and standard attestations, and (2) others who viewed it as a problem to fix, actively correcting errors and composing individualized summaries. Ambiguity in billing requirements drove overdocumentation, resulting in "note bloat" that obscured high-yield information. EHR use during decision-making focused primarily on risk assessment, though navigation challenges hindered access to critical data. Forecasting key outcomes that alter management or facilitate shared decision-making was seen as valuable. Automated risk stratification, generated from live EHR data while minimizing alert fatigue, was seen as a potential solution.

Conclusions: ACS clinicians use various tactics to navigate EHR challenges and focus on high-value tasks. Streamlined risk assessment using EHR data may strengthen decision-making in critical moments, but solutions must integrate seamlessly within existing workflows to provide rapid and accurate outputs that prioritize meaningful outcomes.

急诊外科的电子健康记录工作流程:人种学研究。
背景:利用电子健康记录(EHR)工作流程、减少冗余和支持决策的系统策略在急症护理外科(ACS)中仍然有限。了解EHR系统和工作流程如何与时间敏感设置交叉对于改善ACS的决策和结果至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估ACS临床医生如何利用电子病历进行决策,并确定电子病历支持决策的机遇和挑战。方法:我们进行了为期6个月的定性人种学研究,结合对15名ACS外科医生和提供者的深入访谈,以及由外科医生和组织社会学家在整个围手术期进行100小时的“配对田野调查”观察。利用建构主义理论,我们确定了ACS中ehr决策的推动因素、挑战和机遇。结果:外科医生分为两组:(1)接受信息过载是EHR固有的,依赖通用模板和标准证明;(2)其他人将其视为需要解决的问题,积极纠正错误并撰写个性化摘要。账单需求的模糊性导致了过度文档化,导致“票据膨胀”,掩盖了高收益信息。决策过程中电子病历的使用主要集中在风险评估上,尽管导航方面的挑战阻碍了对关键数据的访问。预测改变管理或促进共同决策的关键结果被认为是有价值的。根据实时EHR数据生成的自动化风险分层,同时最大限度地减少警报疲劳,被视为潜在的解决方案。结论:ACS临床医生使用各种策略来应对电子病历挑战并专注于高价值任务。使用电子病历数据的简化风险评估可以在关键时刻加强决策,但解决方案必须与现有工作流程无缝集成,以提供快速准确的输出,优先考虑有意义的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书