Beyond individual deficit: A structural analysis of mental health access for Black immigrant youth of African descent in Canada.

IF 2.2
Temitayo Sodunke, Nancy Ross, Penelope Poyah, Robert Gilbert, Jeff Karabanow
{"title":"Beyond individual deficit: A structural analysis of mental health access for Black immigrant youth of African descent in Canada.","authors":"Temitayo Sodunke, Nancy Ross, Penelope Poyah, Robert Gilbert, Jeff Karabanow","doi":"10.1177/2752535X261492025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBlack populations have deep ancestral ties to Canada, yet little research examines what shapes access to mental healthcare for Black immigrant youth of African descent (BIYAD), defined here as first-generation African-born Black young adults aged 18 to 34. Almost none of these studies examine how race, immigration status and young adulthood intersect to shape that access.PurposeTo argue that persistent underutilisation of mental health services by BIYAD is structurally produced rather than a failure of individual help-seeking or resilience, and to identify the structural drivers that clinic-centred models obscure by treating distress as personal deficit.Research DesignConceptual and critical policy analysis integrating Levesque and colleagues' multidimensional model of access with intersectionality theory. No empirical study was undertaken.Study SampleNot applicable. The analytic focus is BIYAD in Canada. No primary data were collected.Data Collection and/or AnalysisPeer-reviewed and grey literature on anti-Black racism, immigration and settlement, socio-economic position and Black mental health in Canada was assembled purposively and analysed against the five access dimensions and these intersecting axes.ResultsAccess narrows at every dimension: outreach that misses African-born communities and mistrust after racist encounters (approachability); stigma and few providers sharing language, faith or race (acceptability); thin Black-led provision and long waits (availability); precarious work and uninsured psychotherapy (affordability); and clinic-centred care that misreads spiritually grounded distress (appropriateness). These constraints compound rather than add. Framing resilience as the remedy recasts structural failure as personal attribute.ConclusionHealth equity for BIYAD requires structural and community-grounded reform rather than individual remediation: accountable anti-racism and cultural safety measures, culturally responsive community-based care, and sustained investment in Black-led services.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X261492025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X261492025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundBlack populations have deep ancestral ties to Canada, yet little research examines what shapes access to mental healthcare for Black immigrant youth of African descent (BIYAD), defined here as first-generation African-born Black young adults aged 18 to 34. Almost none of these studies examine how race, immigration status and young adulthood intersect to shape that access.PurposeTo argue that persistent underutilisation of mental health services by BIYAD is structurally produced rather than a failure of individual help-seeking or resilience, and to identify the structural drivers that clinic-centred models obscure by treating distress as personal deficit.Research DesignConceptual and critical policy analysis integrating Levesque and colleagues' multidimensional model of access with intersectionality theory. No empirical study was undertaken.Study SampleNot applicable. The analytic focus is BIYAD in Canada. No primary data were collected.Data Collection and/or AnalysisPeer-reviewed and grey literature on anti-Black racism, immigration and settlement, socio-economic position and Black mental health in Canada was assembled purposively and analysed against the five access dimensions and these intersecting axes.ResultsAccess narrows at every dimension: outreach that misses African-born communities and mistrust after racist encounters (approachability); stigma and few providers sharing language, faith or race (acceptability); thin Black-led provision and long waits (availability); precarious work and uninsured psychotherapy (affordability); and clinic-centred care that misreads spiritually grounded distress (appropriateness). These constraints compound rather than add. Framing resilience as the remedy recasts structural failure as personal attribute.ConclusionHealth equity for BIYAD requires structural and community-grounded reform rather than individual remediation: accountable anti-racism and cultural safety measures, culturally responsive community-based care, and sustained investment in Black-led services.

超越个人缺陷:加拿大非洲裔黑人移民青年心理健康获取的结构分析。
黑人人口与加拿大有着深厚的祖先关系,但很少有研究调查是什么影响了非洲裔黑人移民青年(BIYAD)获得精神保健的机会,这里定义为18至34岁的第一代非洲出生的黑人年轻人。几乎没有一项研究考察种族、移民身份和年轻的成年期是如何相互影响,从而形成这种获取途径的。目的:论证BIYAD对心理健康服务的持续利用不足是结构性的,而不是个人寻求帮助或恢复能力的失败,并确定以临床为中心的模型通过将痛苦视为个人缺陷而掩盖的结构性驱动因素。研究设计将Levesque及其同事的多维访问模型与交叉性理论相结合,进行概念性和批判性的政策分析。没有进行实证研究。研究样本不适用。分析的重点是加拿大的BIYAD。未收集原始数据。数据收集和/或分析有目的地收集了关于加拿大反黑人种族主义、移民和定居、社会经济地位和黑人心理健康的同行评审和灰色文献,并根据五个获取维度和这些相交轴进行了分析。结果:每个维度的准入都在缩小:错过非洲裔社区的外联和种族主义遭遇后的不信任(可接近性);污名化和少数提供者共享语言、信仰或种族(可接受性);单薄的Black-led供应和长时间等待(可用性);不稳定的工作和没有保险的心理治疗(负担能力);以临床为中心的护理误解了精神上的痛苦(适当性)。这些制约因素是复合的,而不是增加的。将韧性作为补救措施,将结构性失败重新定义为个人属性。结论:BIYAD的健康公平需要结构性和基于社区的改革,而不是个人补救:负责任的反种族主义和文化安全措施,文化响应的社区护理,以及对黑人主导服务的持续投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书