Cephalomedullary nail fixation of subtrochanteric femur fractures in older adults: Is 1 distal locking screw enough?

IF 0.5
Manasa L Kadiyala, Lauren A Merrell, Abhishek Ganta, Sanjit R Konda, Steven M Rivero, Kenneth A Egol
{"title":"Cephalomedullary nail fixation of subtrochanteric femur fractures in older adults: Is 1 distal locking screw enough?","authors":"Manasa L Kadiyala, Lauren A Merrell, Abhishek Ganta, Sanjit R Konda, Steven M Rivero, Kenneth A Egol","doi":"10.1097/bh9.0000000000000058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subtrochanteric (ST) fractures are proximal femur fractures with strong deforming muscular forces, which complicate anatomical reduction and treatment. These fractures are fixed with intramedullary nails with 2 distal locking screws, although the need for both screws has never been researched.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study's purpose was to investigate the use of 1 versus 2 distal locking screws on clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications.</p><p><strong>Study design/level of evidence: </strong>Retrospective cohort, Level of Evidence III.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-approved retrospective review of a consecutive series of ST femoral fractures was performed. Each patient's medical record was reviewed for demographics, injury and treatment information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: 1 distal locking screw (1-screw cohort) and 2 distal locking screws (2-screw cohort). Distal screw number (1 vs. 2 screws) was chosen by surgeon preference. Comparative and multivariable analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 71.18 ± 19.05 years and average follow-up of 11 months. All fractures were treated with a long antegrade, reamed cephalomedullary nail. Fifty (21.6%) patients were fixed with one 5 mm distal locking screw, and 182 (78.4%) patients had 2 screws. Patients with 1 screw had a shorter operative time in minutes (156.64 ± 47.06 vs. 176.06 ± 41.32, P = .005), but there were no further perioperative differences. Patients treated with 1 screw were more frequently associated with being fixed in a valgus coronal alignment (20% 1 distal screw vs. 5% 2 distal screws, P = .003) and had higher degree of apex anterior angulation (19.7° ± 8.2° 1-screw vs. 10.6° ± 6.3° 2-screw, P = .011). However, this did not significantly affect healing outcomes because both cohorts experienced similar rates of fracture healing, medical and mechanical complications, mortality, and readmission (all P > .050).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinically, a single distal locking bolt is sufficient for ST femur fractures fixed with a cephalomedullary nail. A second distal locking screw may be reserved for situations in which the first screw may not have achieved adequate fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72481,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)","volume":" ","pages":"129-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13626570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bh9.0000000000000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subtrochanteric (ST) fractures are proximal femur fractures with strong deforming muscular forces, which complicate anatomical reduction and treatment. These fractures are fixed with intramedullary nails with 2 distal locking screws, although the need for both screws has never been researched.

Purpose: This study's purpose was to investigate the use of 1 versus 2 distal locking screws on clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications.

Study design/level of evidence: Retrospective cohort, Level of Evidence III.

Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review of a consecutive series of ST femoral fractures was performed. Each patient's medical record was reviewed for demographics, injury and treatment information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: 1 distal locking screw (1-screw cohort) and 2 distal locking screws (2-screw cohort). Distal screw number (1 vs. 2 screws) was chosen by surgeon preference. Comparative and multivariable analyses were conducted.

Results: Two hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 71.18 ± 19.05 years and average follow-up of 11 months. All fractures were treated with a long antegrade, reamed cephalomedullary nail. Fifty (21.6%) patients were fixed with one 5 mm distal locking screw, and 182 (78.4%) patients had 2 screws. Patients with 1 screw had a shorter operative time in minutes (156.64 ± 47.06 vs. 176.06 ± 41.32, P = .005), but there were no further perioperative differences. Patients treated with 1 screw were more frequently associated with being fixed in a valgus coronal alignment (20% 1 distal screw vs. 5% 2 distal screws, P = .003) and had higher degree of apex anterior angulation (19.7° ± 8.2° 1-screw vs. 10.6° ± 6.3° 2-screw, P = .011). However, this did not significantly affect healing outcomes because both cohorts experienced similar rates of fracture healing, medical and mechanical complications, mortality, and readmission (all P > .050).

Conclusion: Clinically, a single distal locking bolt is sufficient for ST femur fractures fixed with a cephalomedullary nail. A second distal locking screw may be reserved for situations in which the first screw may not have achieved adequate fixation.

老年人股骨粗隆下骨折的头髓内钉固定:1枚远端锁定螺钉是否足够?
背景:股骨粗隆下(ST)骨折是股骨近端骨折,具有强烈的肌肉变形力,使解剖复位和治疗复杂化。这些骨折用髓内钉和2枚远端锁定螺钉固定,尽管从未研究过是否需要两枚螺钉。目的:本研究的目的是探讨使用1枚和2枚远端锁定螺钉对临床和影像学结果和并发症的影响。研究设计/证据水平:回顾性队列,证据水平III。方法:一项经irb批准的对连续一系列ST股骨折的回顾性研究。对每位患者的医疗记录进行了人口统计、损伤和治疗信息、围手术期细节、放射学参数、医院质量措施和结果的审查。患者分为2组:1个远端锁定螺钉(1螺钉队列)和2个远端锁定螺钉(2螺钉队列)。远端螺钉数目(1 vs 2)根据外科医生的喜好选择。进行了比较分析和多变量分析。结果:符合纳入标准的患者232例,平均年龄71.18±19.05岁,平均随访11个月。所有骨折均采用长顺行扩孔头髓内钉治疗。50例(21.6%)患者使用1颗5mm远端锁定螺钉固定,182例(78.4%)患者使用2颗螺钉固定。1枚螺钉组手术时间(156.64±47.06 vs 176.06±41.32,P = 0.005)短于1枚螺钉组(P = 0.005),围手术期无进一步差异。使用1颗螺钉治疗的患者更容易固定在外翻冠状位(20% 1颗远端螺钉vs 5% 2颗远端螺钉,P = 0.003),并且具有更高的尖端前角度(19.7°±8.2°1颗螺钉vs 10.6°±6.3°2颗螺钉,P = 0.011)。然而,这并没有显著影响愈合结果,因为两个队列的骨折愈合率、医疗和机械并发症、死亡率和再入院率相似(P均为0.050)。结论:临床上,单远端锁定螺栓足以用于头髓内钉固定ST段股骨骨折。第二远端锁定螺钉可用于第一螺钉未达到充分固定的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书