Algorithmic advances in smart TV content recommendation: a structured evidence-mapping review.

IF 3.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Big Data Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdata.2026.1927033
Zhe Chen, Jing He, Yuanjia Gong, Junge Liang, Jilong Li
{"title":"Algorithmic advances in smart TV content recommendation: a structured evidence-mapping review.","authors":"Zhe Chen, Jing He, Yuanjia Gong, Junge Liang, Jilong Li","doi":"10.3389/fdata.2026.1927033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smart TV recommenders operate under constraints that are less prominent on personal devices: viewing is often passive, one account may represent several viewers, direct feedback is scarce, and programmes are long and semantically rich. We mapped research published from 2015 to 2025 using a structured evidence-review protocol. The submitted bibliography comprised 122 DOI-bearing references, including two foundational sources and 120 records used in the evidence map. Crossref verified 116 records; six stable arXiv DOI records were retained. Searches across six sources yielded 2,526 database-level results. A combined deduplication and title/abstract screening stage removed 2,414 records, leaving 112 unique records for full-text assessment; all 112 full texts were retrieved, 87 records were excluded, and 25 met the eligibility criteria. These 25 studies were combined with the 95-study initial corpus to form the 120-study evidence map. Separately, we conducted an independent dual-reviewer eligibility audit of 126 records, comprising all 120 included studies and six representative boundary exclusions. Agreement was 97.6% (123/126; Cohen's κ = 0.788). Six records were excluded by both reviewers, and three discordant judgments were resolved by joint full-record review. For analysis, each study was assigned one primary technical category and one of six mutually exclusive primary functional goals; secondary technical labels captured hybrid methods. Evidence reporting was profiled separately for data transparency, reproducibility, evaluation design, external validation, and deployment validation. The final literature corpus encompasses intelligent recommendation systems based on deep learning, sequence analysis, graph theory, shared accounts, and multimodal approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":52859,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Big Data","volume":"9 ","pages":"1927033"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2026.1927033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smart TV recommenders operate under constraints that are less prominent on personal devices: viewing is often passive, one account may represent several viewers, direct feedback is scarce, and programmes are long and semantically rich. We mapped research published from 2015 to 2025 using a structured evidence-review protocol. The submitted bibliography comprised 122 DOI-bearing references, including two foundational sources and 120 records used in the evidence map. Crossref verified 116 records; six stable arXiv DOI records were retained. Searches across six sources yielded 2,526 database-level results. A combined deduplication and title/abstract screening stage removed 2,414 records, leaving 112 unique records for full-text assessment; all 112 full texts were retrieved, 87 records were excluded, and 25 met the eligibility criteria. These 25 studies were combined with the 95-study initial corpus to form the 120-study evidence map. Separately, we conducted an independent dual-reviewer eligibility audit of 126 records, comprising all 120 included studies and six representative boundary exclusions. Agreement was 97.6% (123/126; Cohen's κ = 0.788). Six records were excluded by both reviewers, and three discordant judgments were resolved by joint full-record review. For analysis, each study was assigned one primary technical category and one of six mutually exclusive primary functional goals; secondary technical labels captured hybrid methods. Evidence reporting was profiled separately for data transparency, reproducibility, evaluation design, external validation, and deployment validation. The final literature corpus encompasses intelligent recommendation systems based on deep learning, sequence analysis, graph theory, shared accounts, and multimodal approaches.

智能电视内容推荐中的算法进步:结构化证据图谱综述。
智能电视推荐的运行受到个人设备上不太突出的限制:观看往往是被动的,一个账户可能代表几个观众,直接反馈很少,节目很长,语义丰富。我们使用结构化证据审查方案绘制了2015年至2025年发表的研究。提交的参考书目包括122个与doi相关的参考文献,包括2个基础来源和120个证据图中使用的记录。Crossref验证了116条记录;保留了6条稳定的arXiv DOI记录。跨六个源的搜索产生了2526个数据库级结果。综合重复数据删除和标题/摘要筛选阶段删除了2,414条记录,留下112条唯一记录用于全文评估;所有112篇全文被检索,87条记录被排除,25条符合资格标准。这25项研究与95项研究的初始语料库相结合,形成了120项研究的证据图谱。另外,我们对126项记录进行了独立的双审稿人资格审核,包括所有120项纳入的研究和6项具有代表性的边界排除。一致性为97.6% (123/126;Cohen’s κ = 0.788)。6条记录被双方审稿人排除,3条不一致的判断通过联合全记录审评解决。为了进行分析,每项研究分配了一个主要技术类别和六个相互排斥的主要功能目标之一;二级技术标签捕获混合方法。证据报告分别为数据透明度、再现性、评估设计、外部验证和部署验证进行了概要分析。最终的文献语料库包括基于深度学习、序列分析、图论、共享帐户和多模态方法的智能推荐系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书