Assessment of the posterior pelvic ring during examination under anesthesia changes surgeons' classification and treatment decisions of anterior posterior compression pelvic ring injuries.

IF 1.7 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Camryn C Therrien, Kaj Ten Duis, Alessandro Aprato, Hester Banierink, Umberto M R Mezzadri, Henry C Sagi, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Inge H F Reininga, Frank F A IJpma
{"title":"Assessment of the posterior pelvic ring during examination under anesthesia changes surgeons' classification and treatment decisions of anterior posterior compression pelvic ring injuries.","authors":"Camryn C Therrien, Kaj Ten Duis, Alessandro Aprato, Hester Banierink, Umberto M R Mezzadri, Henry C Sagi, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Inge H F Reininga, Frank F A IJpma","doi":"10.1007/s00590-026-04930-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditionally, examination under anesthesia (EUA) focuses on displacement of the anterior pelvic ring and may fail to detect or localize sacroiliac (SI) joint diastasis in patients with anterior-posterior compression (APC) pelvic injuries. This study evaluates the effect of directly observing sacroiliac (SI) diastasis during EUA, compared to observing only the anterior pelvic ring (AP EUA), on changes in classification and treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred international pelvic surgeons were invited to participate in an online survey, with one month between two surveys. All surveys included the same 10 cases of APC injuries. One part included AP EUA images, and the other included additional SI EUA images. Questions regarding classification and treatment were asked, including the need for anterior and posterior fixation, and the side of SI joint fixation. The change in management after the addition of SI EUA images was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred six pelvic trauma surgeons completed the survey with AP EUA images, and 99 also completed the survey with SI EUA images. The addition of SI EUA imaging resulted in a 37% change in classification, with APC1 decreasing from 17% with AP EUA to 10% with SI EUA, APC2 remaining 67%, and APC3 increasing from 17 to 23%. Treatment decisions changed in 29% of all cases. There was an increase in the combined anterior and posterior fixation, from 56 to 74%. Improved lateralization (choice of right or left SI joint fixation) was seen in 4 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this survey, the addition of SI EUA images according to the modified protocol changed surgeons' perception of pelvic ring instability and the subsequent treatment strategy chosen. SI EUA images provide surgeons with information that prompts the addition of an SI joint fixation, resulting in an 18% increase in the use of combined anterior and posterior fixation. SI EUA images also improved injury localization, helping surgeons identify which sacroiliac joint required stabilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-026-04930-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Traditionally, examination under anesthesia (EUA) focuses on displacement of the anterior pelvic ring and may fail to detect or localize sacroiliac (SI) joint diastasis in patients with anterior-posterior compression (APC) pelvic injuries. This study evaluates the effect of directly observing sacroiliac (SI) diastasis during EUA, compared to observing only the anterior pelvic ring (AP EUA), on changes in classification and treatment plan.

Methods: Four hundred international pelvic surgeons were invited to participate in an online survey, with one month between two surveys. All surveys included the same 10 cases of APC injuries. One part included AP EUA images, and the other included additional SI EUA images. Questions regarding classification and treatment were asked, including the need for anterior and posterior fixation, and the side of SI joint fixation. The change in management after the addition of SI EUA images was assessed.

Results: One hundred six pelvic trauma surgeons completed the survey with AP EUA images, and 99 also completed the survey with SI EUA images. The addition of SI EUA imaging resulted in a 37% change in classification, with APC1 decreasing from 17% with AP EUA to 10% with SI EUA, APC2 remaining 67%, and APC3 increasing from 17 to 23%. Treatment decisions changed in 29% of all cases. There was an increase in the combined anterior and posterior fixation, from 56 to 74%. Improved lateralization (choice of right or left SI joint fixation) was seen in 4 cases.

Conclusion: In this survey, the addition of SI EUA images according to the modified protocol changed surgeons' perception of pelvic ring instability and the subsequent treatment strategy chosen. SI EUA images provide surgeons with information that prompts the addition of an SI joint fixation, resulting in an 18% increase in the use of combined anterior and posterior fixation. SI EUA images also improved injury localization, helping surgeons identify which sacroiliac joint required stabilization.

麻醉下检查时对骨盆后环的评估改变了外科医生对前、后压迫性骨盆环损伤的分类和治疗决策。
目的:传统上,麻醉下检查(EUA)侧重于骨盆前环移位,可能无法检测或定位骶髂(SI)关节移位的前后压迫(APC)骨盆损伤患者。本研究评估直接观察骶髂(SI)转移在EUA期间与仅观察骨盆前环(AP EUA)期间对分类和治疗方案变化的影响。方法:邀请400名国际盆腔外科医生参加在线调查,两次调查间隔一个月。所有调查均包括相同的10例APC损伤。一部分包括AP EUA图像,另一部分包括附加的SI EUA图像。询问有关分类和治疗的问题,包括需要前后固定,以及SI关节固定的侧面。评估添加SI EUA图像后管理的变化。结果:106名骨盆创伤外科医生完成了AP EUA图像的调查,99名外科医生完成了SI EUA图像的调查。添加SI EUA成像导致分类变化37%,APC1从AP EUA的17%下降到SI EUA的10%,APC2保持67%,APC3从17%增加到23%。29%的病例改变了治疗决定。前后联合固定的比例从56%增加到74%。改善侧位(选择右侧或左侧SI关节固定)4例。结论:在本研究中,根据修改后的方案添加SI EUA图像改变了外科医生对骨盆环不稳定的感知和后续治疗策略的选择。SI EUA图像为外科医生提供了提示增加SI关节固定的信息,导致前后联合固定的使用增加了18%。SI EUA图像也改善了损伤定位,帮助外科医生确定哪个骶髂关节需要稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书