The Potential Role of Nonclinical Patient Support Service Staff in Reducing Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations of Urban and Rural Patients of Health Centers Funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nadereh Pourat, Weihao Zhou, Leigh Ann Haley, Alison Feise, Jamie Ryan
{"title":"The Potential Role of Nonclinical Patient Support Service Staff in Reducing Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations of Urban and Rural Patients of Health Centers Funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration","authors":"Nadereh Pourat,&nbsp;Weihao Zhou,&nbsp;Leigh Ann Haley,&nbsp;Alison Feise,&nbsp;Jamie Ryan","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Payers such as Medicaid are concerned about high rates of potentially avoidable acute care utilization by beneficiaries called high-need, high-cost (HNHC) and frequently seen by Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers. Yet, health center HNHC patients have comparatively lower acute care utilization than patients of other primary care providers, possibly due to better access to nonclinical staff who provide patient support services, such as care coordination and self-management education. Furthermore, rural areas face provider shortages that may impact staffing capacity. We examined the association between capacity of staff who provide patient support services and rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations at health centers by urban-rural status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used number of full-time equivalent (FTE) outreach workers and patient and community education specialists reported in the Uniform Data System with Medicaid claims data for HNHC Medicaid beneficiaries in California. We developed a negative binomial regression model to assess this relationship, accounting for patient demographics and health status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We found a reduced rate of ED visits per patient per year given 4 or more hours per week of outreach workers versus none overall (−0.24) and for health center patients in rural areas (−1.02). Similarly, 4 or more hours per week of patient and community education specialists versus none was associated with fewer hospitalizations overall (−0.04) and among patients of urban (−0.04) health centers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggest more care coordination and patient self-management education capacity at primary care providers may be correlated with reduced acute care utilization in rural and urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Payers such as Medicaid are concerned about high rates of potentially avoidable acute care utilization by beneficiaries called high-need, high-cost (HNHC) and frequently seen by Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers. Yet, health center HNHC patients have comparatively lower acute care utilization than patients of other primary care providers, possibly due to better access to nonclinical staff who provide patient support services, such as care coordination and self-management education. Furthermore, rural areas face provider shortages that may impact staffing capacity. We examined the association between capacity of staff who provide patient support services and rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations at health centers by urban-rural status.

Methods

We used number of full-time equivalent (FTE) outreach workers and patient and community education specialists reported in the Uniform Data System with Medicaid claims data for HNHC Medicaid beneficiaries in California. We developed a negative binomial regression model to assess this relationship, accounting for patient demographics and health status.

Findings

We found a reduced rate of ED visits per patient per year given 4 or more hours per week of outreach workers versus none overall (−0.24) and for health center patients in rural areas (−1.02). Similarly, 4 or more hours per week of patient and community education specialists versus none was associated with fewer hospitalizations overall (−0.04) and among patients of urban (−0.04) health centers.

Conclusions

Findings suggest more care coordination and patient self-management education capacity at primary care providers may be correlated with reduced acute care utilization in rural and urban areas.

非临床患者支持服务人员在减少急诊就诊和由卫生资源和服务管理局资助的卫生中心城乡患者住院方面的潜在作用。
目的:医疗补助等支付方关注的是高需求、高成本(HNHC)受益人潜在可避免的急性护理使用率高,这些受益人经常出现在卫生资源和服务管理局资助的卫生中心。然而,与其他初级保健提供者相比,卫生中心HNHC患者的急性护理利用率相对较低,这可能是由于提供患者支持服务(如护理协调和自我管理教育)的非临床工作人员更容易获得。此外,农村地区面临提供者短缺,这可能影响到人员配备能力。我们考察了城乡状况下提供病人支持服务的工作人员的能力与急诊科(ED)就诊率和住院率之间的关系。方法:我们使用了加利福尼亚州HNHC医疗补助受益人的医疗补助索赔数据统一数据系统中报告的全职等效(FTE)外展工作者以及患者和社区教育专家的数量。我们开发了一个负二项回归模型来评估这种关系,考虑到患者人口统计学和健康状况。研究结果:我们发现,每周有4小时或更长时间外展工作人员的患者每年急诊室就诊率降低,而总体上没有(-0.24),农村地区的保健中心患者(-1.02)。同样,每周有4小时或更多的患者和社区教育专家与没有患者相比,总体住院率(-0.04)和城市卫生中心的患者住院率(-0.04)更低。结论:研究结果表明,在农村和城市地区,初级保健提供者更多的护理协调和患者自我管理教育能力可能与降低急性护理利用率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书