Awareness, Accessibility, Authenticity, and Appropriateness: Multilevel Determinants of Research Engagement Among Underrepresented AYA Cancer Survivors.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Control Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1177/10732748261494049
Lauren V Ghazal, Jacob Dogtir, J Lea Brown, Rachel Brandon, Meiyan Chen, Nina Francis-Levin, Robin Voisine, Christabel K Cheung, Addison Rappaport, Brad Zebrack, Anao Zhang
{"title":"Awareness, Accessibility, Authenticity, and Appropriateness: Multilevel Determinants of Research Engagement Among Underrepresented AYA Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Lauren V Ghazal, Jacob Dogtir, J Lea Brown, Rachel Brandon, Meiyan Chen, Nina Francis-Levin, Robin Voisine, Christabel K Cheung, Addison Rappaport, Brad Zebrack, Anao Zhang","doi":"10.1177/10732748261494049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAdolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors (ages 15-39 at diagnosis) who identify as sexual and gender minorities [SGM] and/or Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color [BIPOC]) experience survivorship challenges compounded by discrimination, mistrust, and culturally incongruent care. These factors contribute to inequities in health outcomes and research participation. This qualitative study explored the experiences of underrepresented AYA cancer survivors and key stakeholders in research engagement.MethodsParticipants were recruited through five US-based academic cancer centers and five community-based organizations. Interviews were conducted via two-way video conferencing, and transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. A Community Advisory Panel (CAP) consisting of 10 underrepresented AYAs co-developed semi-structured interview guides and contributed to study interpretation.ResultsTwenty-eight participants completed interviews (n=22 survivors, n=5 healthcare professionals, n=1 caregiver). Participants identified as BIPOC (64.3%), SGM (46.4%), and both (23.1%). Four themes shaped research engagement: (1) Awareness (visibility and pathways to research opportunities); (2) Accessibility (emotional, logistical, and institutional feasibility); (3) Authenticity (trust and perceived legitimacy); and (4) Appropriateness (alignment with identity and lived context).ConclusionResearch engagement among underrepresented AYA cancer survivors is shaped by interconnected multilevel factors. Advancing equity requires moving beyond recruitment to redesign research approaches that enhance visibility, reduce structural barriers, build trust, and align participation with AYAs' identities and lived experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261494049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748261494049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAdolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors (ages 15-39 at diagnosis) who identify as sexual and gender minorities [SGM] and/or Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color [BIPOC]) experience survivorship challenges compounded by discrimination, mistrust, and culturally incongruent care. These factors contribute to inequities in health outcomes and research participation. This qualitative study explored the experiences of underrepresented AYA cancer survivors and key stakeholders in research engagement.MethodsParticipants were recruited through five US-based academic cancer centers and five community-based organizations. Interviews were conducted via two-way video conferencing, and transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. A Community Advisory Panel (CAP) consisting of 10 underrepresented AYAs co-developed semi-structured interview guides and contributed to study interpretation.ResultsTwenty-eight participants completed interviews (n=22 survivors, n=5 healthcare professionals, n=1 caregiver). Participants identified as BIPOC (64.3%), SGM (46.4%), and both (23.1%). Four themes shaped research engagement: (1) Awareness (visibility and pathways to research opportunities); (2) Accessibility (emotional, logistical, and institutional feasibility); (3) Authenticity (trust and perceived legitimacy); and (4) Appropriateness (alignment with identity and lived context).ConclusionResearch engagement among underrepresented AYA cancer survivors is shaped by interconnected multilevel factors. Advancing equity requires moving beyond recruitment to redesign research approaches that enhance visibility, reduce structural barriers, build trust, and align participation with AYAs' identities and lived experiences.

意识,可及性,真实性和适当性:在代表性不足的AYA癌症幸存者中研究参与的多层次决定因素。
青少年和年轻人(AYA)癌症幸存者(诊断时年龄15-39岁)被认定为性和性别少数群体(SGM)和/或黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)),他们面临着由歧视、不信任和文化不一致的护理所带来的生存挑战。这些因素助长了健康结果和研究参与方面的不平等。本定性研究探讨了代表性不足的AYA癌症幸存者和主要利益相关者在研究参与中的经历。方法通过5个美国学术癌症中心和5个社区组织招募参与者。访谈采用双向视频会议方式进行,访谈记录采用归纳主题分析方法进行分析。一个由10个未被充分代表的aya组成的社区咨询小组(CAP)共同制定了半结构化的访谈指南,并为研究解释做出了贡献。结果28名参与者完成了访谈(n=22名幸存者,n=5名医护人员,n=1名护理人员)。参与者被确定为BIPOC (64.3%), SGM(46.4%)和两者(23.1%)。四个主题塑造了研究参与:(1)意识(可见性和获得研究机会的途径);(2)可及性(情感、后勤和制度可行性);(3)真实性(信任和感知合法性);(4)适当性(与身份和生活环境相一致)。结论:未被充分代表的AYA癌症幸存者的研究参与受到相互关联的多层次因素的影响。促进公平需要超越招聘,重新设计研究方法,以提高知名度,减少结构性障碍,建立信任,并使参与与青年助理的身份和生活经历保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书