Futures-Oriented Directions in Sustainable Design for Senior Housing: A Scientometric Analysis of Research on Energy Load Reduction and Occupant Comfort (1980-2025).

IF 1 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Milad Olfat, Amir Hossein Shirdel, Faezeh Asadpour, Saeed Haghnia
{"title":"Futures-Oriented Directions in Sustainable Design for Senior Housing: A Scientometric Analysis of Research on Energy Load Reduction and Occupant Comfort (1980-2025).","authors":"Milad Olfat, Amir Hossein Shirdel, Faezeh Asadpour, Saeed Haghnia","doi":"10.1007/s10823-026-09600-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In light of the accelerating global trend of population ageing and the pressing need to reduce energy loads within the building sector, the design of housing for older adults from a sustainability perspective has emerged as a significant interdisciplinary challenge. However, existing literature has not systematically integrated two critical domains: the physiological and psychological needs of older adults and the architectural approaches that can effectively reduce energy consumption. This study aims to identify conceptual gaps and map the intellectual structure of this field through a scientometric analysis of 646 English-language documents (1980-2025) retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science and merged into a single deduplicated corpus. Utilizing Bibliometrix and VOSviewer, we examined co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence patterns, and factor analyses. Findings indicate that terms relating to health and the built environment, to housing and energy, and to social and cultural context, occupy distinct and weakly connected regions of the corpus, bridged by comparatively few terms. Annual output was minimal before 2000 and rose steadily from the mid-2000s to its highest observed level of 66 publications in 2025. The principal clusters center on health and care, housing and energy efficiency, sustainability and urban policy, and ageing in place. Although the field has experienced rapid growth, interdisciplinary collaboration among architecture, energy systems engineering, and the social sciences remains limited. Within this corpus, terms concerning thermal comfort requirements for older adults and those concerning, low-energy architectural approaches are weakly connected, indicating where integrative frameworks remain sparse rather than establishing that none exist. By identifying this pattern, and the limited connections among these thematic clusters and author networks, the present research indicates directions for architectural approaches that are not only sustainable and energy-efficient but also equitable, human-centered, and genuinely responsive to the needs of ageing populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-026-09600-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In light of the accelerating global trend of population ageing and the pressing need to reduce energy loads within the building sector, the design of housing for older adults from a sustainability perspective has emerged as a significant interdisciplinary challenge. However, existing literature has not systematically integrated two critical domains: the physiological and psychological needs of older adults and the architectural approaches that can effectively reduce energy consumption. This study aims to identify conceptual gaps and map the intellectual structure of this field through a scientometric analysis of 646 English-language documents (1980-2025) retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science and merged into a single deduplicated corpus. Utilizing Bibliometrix and VOSviewer, we examined co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence patterns, and factor analyses. Findings indicate that terms relating to health and the built environment, to housing and energy, and to social and cultural context, occupy distinct and weakly connected regions of the corpus, bridged by comparatively few terms. Annual output was minimal before 2000 and rose steadily from the mid-2000s to its highest observed level of 66 publications in 2025. The principal clusters center on health and care, housing and energy efficiency, sustainability and urban policy, and ageing in place. Although the field has experienced rapid growth, interdisciplinary collaboration among architecture, energy systems engineering, and the social sciences remains limited. Within this corpus, terms concerning thermal comfort requirements for older adults and those concerning, low-energy architectural approaches are weakly connected, indicating where integrative frameworks remain sparse rather than establishing that none exist. By identifying this pattern, and the limited connections among these thematic clusters and author networks, the present research indicates directions for architectural approaches that are not only sustainable and energy-efficient but also equitable, human-centered, and genuinely responsive to the needs of ageing populations.

面向未来的老年住宅可持续设计方向:能源负荷降低和居住者舒适度研究的科学计量分析(1980-2025)。
鉴于全球人口老龄化趋势的加速以及减少建筑领域能源负荷的迫切需要,从可持续发展的角度为老年人设计住房已经成为一个重大的跨学科挑战。然而,现有文献并没有系统地整合两个关键领域:老年人的生理和心理需求以及能够有效降低能耗的建筑方法。本研究旨在通过对从Scopus和Web of Science检索到的646篇英语文献(1980-2025)进行科学计量分析,并将其合并到一个去重复的语料库中,以确定该领域的概念差距并绘制该领域的知识结构。利用Bibliometrix和VOSviewer,我们检查了合作作者网络、关键词共现模式和因子分析。研究结果表明,与健康和建筑环境、住房和能源以及社会和文化背景相关的术语占据了语料库中不同且联系较弱的区域,由相对较少的术语连接起来。2000年之前的年产量最低,从2000年代中期开始稳步上升,到2025年达到66份出版物的最高观测水平。主要集群集中在卫生和保健、住房和能源效率、可持续性和城市政策以及老龄问题。尽管该领域经历了快速发展,但建筑、能源系统工程和社会科学之间的跨学科合作仍然有限。在这个语料库中,关于老年人热舒适需求的术语和那些关于低能耗建筑方法的术语之间的联系很弱,这表明综合框架仍然是稀疏的,而不是建立一个不存在的框架。通过识别这种模式,以及这些主题集群和作者网络之间的有限联系,本研究指出了建筑方法的方向,这些方法不仅是可持续的和节能的,而且是公平的,以人为本的,并真正响应人口老龄化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology is an international and interdisciplinary journal providing a forum for scholarly discussion of the aging process and issues of the aged throughout the world. The journal emphasizes discussions of research findings, theoretical issues, and applied approaches and provides a comparative orientation to the study of aging in cultural contexts The core of the journal comprises a broad range of articles dealing with global aging, written from the perspectives of history, anthropology, sociology, political science, psychology, population studies, health/biology, etc. We welcome articles that examine aging within a particular cultural context, compare aging and older adults across societies, and/or compare sub-cultural groupings or ethnic minorities within or across larger societies. Comparative analyses of topics relating to older adults, such as aging within socialist vs. capitalist systems or within societies with different social service delivery systems, also are appropriate for this journal. With societies becoming ever more multicultural and experiencing a `graying'' of their population on a hitherto unprecedented scale, the Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology stands at the forefront of one of the most pressing issues of our times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书