[Evaluation of one-minute wonders in professional practice, research, and teaching].

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lars Krüger, Thomas Mannebach, Peter Nydahl, Elke Hotze, Benjamin Kühme, Gero Langer, Carsten Hermes, Valery Maurice Kitz, Matthias Kochanek, Sascha David, Marianne Rahner, Birgit Schmidt
{"title":"[Evaluation of one-minute wonders in professional practice, research, and teaching].","authors":"Lars Krüger, Thomas Mannebach, Peter Nydahl, Elke Hotze, Benjamin Kühme, Gero Langer, Carsten Hermes, Valery Maurice Kitz, Matthias Kochanek, Sascha David, Marianne Rahner, Birgit Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s00063-026-01501-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One-minute wonders (OMWs) are used internationally and nationally in various settings as a part of educational initiatives. To date, there are no standardized criteria for evaluating OMWs within the framework of quality assurance and performance assessment. The aim of the current study was to develop a checklist and a criteria-based scoring system for testing and evaluating OMWs. The theory-based development of these instruments was carried out in a consensus process, drawing on cognitive load theory and the concept of microlearning. The result was a practical checklist consisting of 11 items. The criteria-based scoring system contains 9 main categories with 25 items, for which a total of 100 points can be reached in the quality assessment. The developed checklist and the derived assessment and evaluation criteria can serve as a resource for authors and instructors. In the long term, these recommendations should be evaluated and incorporated into a manual or reporting statement, for example through a Delphi study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-026-01501-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One-minute wonders (OMWs) are used internationally and nationally in various settings as a part of educational initiatives. To date, there are no standardized criteria for evaluating OMWs within the framework of quality assurance and performance assessment. The aim of the current study was to develop a checklist and a criteria-based scoring system for testing and evaluating OMWs. The theory-based development of these instruments was carried out in a consensus process, drawing on cognitive load theory and the concept of microlearning. The result was a practical checklist consisting of 11 items. The criteria-based scoring system contains 9 main categories with 25 items, for which a total of 100 points can be reached in the quality assessment. The developed checklist and the derived assessment and evaluation criteria can serve as a resource for authors and instructors. In the long term, these recommendations should be evaluated and incorporated into a manual or reporting statement, for example through a Delphi study.

[专业实践、研究和教学中一分钟奇迹的评价]。
一分钟奇迹(OMWs)作为教育活动的一部分在国际和国内的各种环境中使用。到目前为止,在质量保证和业绩评估的框架内,还没有评价omw的标准化标准。本研究的目的是开发一份检查表和一个基于标准的评分系统,用于测试和评估外伤性疾病。这些工具的理论开发是在一个共识的过程中进行的,借鉴了认知负荷理论和微学习的概念。结果是一个包含11个项目的实用清单。基于标准的评分系统包含9个主要类别,共25个项目,质量评估总分为100分。开发的检查表和衍生的评估和评价标准可以作为作者和教师的资源。从长远来看,这些建议应加以评价,并纳入手册或报告说明,例如通过德尔菲研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书