Final-year logbooks in otorhinolaryngology in Germany - insights from a needs analysis and user experience study of final-year students and supervisors.
Kathrin Gerstacker, Jonas Engert, Luke Lükewille, Adrian von Witzleben, Lisa Budelmann
{"title":"Final-year logbooks in otorhinolaryngology in Germany - insights from a needs analysis and user experience study of final-year students and supervisors.","authors":"Kathrin Gerstacker, Jonas Engert, Luke Lükewille, Adrian von Witzleben, Lisa Budelmann","doi":"10.3205/zma001871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In an effort to improve the structured training during the practical year in Germany, the German Medical Licensing Regulations have made it mandatory for final-year students to keep a logbook in 2013. This strategy aims to ensure the relevance and review of learning content and to improve the transparency and quality of teaching in the final year. The logbook recommended by the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology is to be used nationwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study investigated the acceptance and use of logbooks through voluntary, anonymous online surveys of supervisors and students in Germany. The questionnaires contained eight and twelve questions, respectively. A total of 50 supervisors and 28 students participated in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 26% of supervisors and 21% of students do not use a logbook. 64% of the supervisors preferred a digital version of the logbook, while 60.7% of the students also mostly agree with a digital version. It is particularly noteworthy that 79% of the students, who currently rarely use the logbook (as an analog version), stated that they would use it more often if it were available digitally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms the highly heterogeneous use of logbooks during the practical year in otorhinolaryngology. Faculty-owned logbooks can be customized to specific curricula and needs more easily, which explains their popularity. Although most supervisors consider digitization useful, there are concerns about the effort involved and the potential lack of added value. Therefore, a digitized logbook should be designed not only as a control tool, but also as an interactive learning companion with clear learning objectives, in order to promote internal learning motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"43 6","pages":"Doc77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In an effort to improve the structured training during the practical year in Germany, the German Medical Licensing Regulations have made it mandatory for final-year students to keep a logbook in 2013. This strategy aims to ensure the relevance and review of learning content and to improve the transparency and quality of teaching in the final year. The logbook recommended by the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology is to be used nationwide.
Methods: Our study investigated the acceptance and use of logbooks through voluntary, anonymous online surveys of supervisors and students in Germany. The questionnaires contained eight and twelve questions, respectively. A total of 50 supervisors and 28 students participated in the survey.
Results: The results showed that 26% of supervisors and 21% of students do not use a logbook. 64% of the supervisors preferred a digital version of the logbook, while 60.7% of the students also mostly agree with a digital version. It is particularly noteworthy that 79% of the students, who currently rarely use the logbook (as an analog version), stated that they would use it more often if it were available digitally.
Conclusion: Our study confirms the highly heterogeneous use of logbooks during the practical year in otorhinolaryngology. Faculty-owned logbooks can be customized to specific curricula and needs more easily, which explains their popularity. Although most supervisors consider digitization useful, there are concerns about the effort involved and the potential lack of added value. Therefore, a digitized logbook should be designed not only as a control tool, but also as an interactive learning companion with clear learning objectives, in order to promote internal learning motivation.
期刊介绍:
GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.