Final-year logbooks in otorhinolaryngology in Germany - insights from a needs analysis and user experience study of final-year students and supervisors.

IF 2.3 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2026-09-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001871
Kathrin Gerstacker, Jonas Engert, Luke Lükewille, Adrian von Witzleben, Lisa Budelmann
{"title":"Final-year logbooks in otorhinolaryngology in Germany - insights from a needs analysis and user experience study of final-year students and supervisors.","authors":"Kathrin Gerstacker, Jonas Engert, Luke Lükewille, Adrian von Witzleben, Lisa Budelmann","doi":"10.3205/zma001871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In an effort to improve the structured training during the practical year in Germany, the German Medical Licensing Regulations have made it mandatory for final-year students to keep a logbook in 2013. This strategy aims to ensure the relevance and review of learning content and to improve the transparency and quality of teaching in the final year. The logbook recommended by the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology is to be used nationwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study investigated the acceptance and use of logbooks through voluntary, anonymous online surveys of supervisors and students in Germany. The questionnaires contained eight and twelve questions, respectively. A total of 50 supervisors and 28 students participated in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 26% of supervisors and 21% of students do not use a logbook. 64% of the supervisors preferred a digital version of the logbook, while 60.7% of the students also mostly agree with a digital version. It is particularly noteworthy that 79% of the students, who currently rarely use the logbook (as an analog version), stated that they would use it more often if it were available digitally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms the highly heterogeneous use of logbooks during the practical year in otorhinolaryngology. Faculty-owned logbooks can be customized to specific curricula and needs more easily, which explains their popularity. Although most supervisors consider digitization useful, there are concerns about the effort involved and the potential lack of added value. Therefore, a digitized logbook should be designed not only as a control tool, but also as an interactive learning companion with clear learning objectives, in order to promote internal learning motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"43 6","pages":"Doc77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In an effort to improve the structured training during the practical year in Germany, the German Medical Licensing Regulations have made it mandatory for final-year students to keep a logbook in 2013. This strategy aims to ensure the relevance and review of learning content and to improve the transparency and quality of teaching in the final year. The logbook recommended by the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology is to be used nationwide.

Methods: Our study investigated the acceptance and use of logbooks through voluntary, anonymous online surveys of supervisors and students in Germany. The questionnaires contained eight and twelve questions, respectively. A total of 50 supervisors and 28 students participated in the survey.

Results: The results showed that 26% of supervisors and 21% of students do not use a logbook. 64% of the supervisors preferred a digital version of the logbook, while 60.7% of the students also mostly agree with a digital version. It is particularly noteworthy that 79% of the students, who currently rarely use the logbook (as an analog version), stated that they would use it more often if it were available digitally.

Conclusion: Our study confirms the highly heterogeneous use of logbooks during the practical year in otorhinolaryngology. Faculty-owned logbooks can be customized to specific curricula and needs more easily, which explains their popularity. Although most supervisors consider digitization useful, there are concerns about the effort involved and the potential lack of added value. Therefore, a digitized logbook should be designed not only as a control tool, but also as an interactive learning companion with clear learning objectives, in order to promote internal learning motivation.

德国耳鼻喉科的最后一年日志——对最后一年学生和导师的需求分析和用户体验研究的见解。
背景:为了改善德国实践年度的结构化培训,2013年,德国医疗许可条例规定,最后一年的学生必须保留日志。该战略旨在确保学习内容的相关性和审查,并在最后一年提高教学的透明度和质量。德国耳鼻咽喉学会推荐的日志将在全国范围内使用。方法:我们的研究通过对德国的导师和学生进行自愿、匿名的在线调查来调查日志的接受度和使用情况。问卷分别包含8个和12个问题。共有50名主管和28名学生参与了调查。结果:结果显示26%的导师和21%的学生不使用日志。64%的导师更喜欢电子版的日志,而60.7%的学生也大多同意电子版。特别值得注意的是,目前很少使用日志(作为模拟版本)的79%的学生表示,如果可以使用数字版本,他们会更频繁地使用日志。结论:我们的研究证实了耳鼻喉科在实际年度中使用日志的高度异质性。教师拥有的日志可以更容易地根据特定的课程和需求进行定制,这就是它们受欢迎的原因。虽然大多数主管认为数字化是有用的,但也有人担心所涉及的努力和潜在的缺乏附加值。因此,数字化日志不仅应被设计为一种控制工具,还应被设计为具有明确学习目标的交互式学习伴侣,以促进内部学习动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书