Stereopsis and Outer Retinal Structure After Reduced-Fluence Photodynamic Therapy for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A 12-Month Study.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmology and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s40123-026-01511-0
Maya Kishimoto-Kishi, Akiko Miki, Amiko Matsuyama, Toshiki Oka, Eisuke Ikeuchi, Makoto Nakamura
{"title":"Stereopsis and Outer Retinal Structure After Reduced-Fluence Photodynamic Therapy for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A 12-Month Study.","authors":"Maya Kishimoto-Kishi, Akiko Miki, Amiko Matsuyama, Toshiki Oka, Eisuke Ikeuchi, Makoto Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s40123-026-01511-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Changes in binocular function after anatomical resolution of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) following reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RFPDT) remain unclear. We characterized 12-month stereopsis outcomes and the associated clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 51 eyes of 51 patients with unilateral CSC treated with RFPDT. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Titmus Stereo Test (TST), TNO stereotest (TNO), and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Stereopsis (TST and TNO) was the primary longitudinal outcome; BCVA and CRT were secondary. Change over time was assessed with linear mixed-effects models. Associations of baseline and concurrent clinical and OCT factors with stereopsis were examined using Spearman correlation and multivariable linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvements in TST, TNO, and BCVA were evident by 3 months (all P < 0.001), with no significant further change thereafter except a small BCVA gain by 12 months (P = 0.006). At 12 months, abnormal stereopsis remained in 35% (TST) and 57% (TNO) of eyes. Larger baseline serous retinal detachment (SRD) area was independently associated with worse concurrent TST and TNO, but not with 12-month stereopsis. Greater 12-month outer retinal layer thickness (ORLT) was associated with better concurrent TNO in an adjusted model (P = 0.029). In eyes with good baseline acuity, longer baseline photoreceptor outer segment (POS) length was the only independent predictor of better 12-month TST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stereopsis improved during the 12 months following RFPDT but often remained abnormal, even in eyes with good BCVA. Different structural parameters were associated with stereopsis by disease stage-subretinal fluid extent during active disease and residual outer retinal structure after resolution-and in these good-acuity eyes, pre-treatment outer retinal structure predicted 12-month stereopsis. Together, these findings suggest that stereopsis may capture residual visual dysfunction that is not fully reflected by BCVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19623,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3913-3926"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13694671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-026-01511-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Changes in binocular function after anatomical resolution of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) following reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RFPDT) remain unclear. We characterized 12-month stereopsis outcomes and the associated clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) factors.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 51 eyes of 51 patients with unilateral CSC treated with RFPDT. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Titmus Stereo Test (TST), TNO stereotest (TNO), and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Stereopsis (TST and TNO) was the primary longitudinal outcome; BCVA and CRT were secondary. Change over time was assessed with linear mixed-effects models. Associations of baseline and concurrent clinical and OCT factors with stereopsis were examined using Spearman correlation and multivariable linear regression.

Results: Improvements in TST, TNO, and BCVA were evident by 3 months (all P < 0.001), with no significant further change thereafter except a small BCVA gain by 12 months (P = 0.006). At 12 months, abnormal stereopsis remained in 35% (TST) and 57% (TNO) of eyes. Larger baseline serous retinal detachment (SRD) area was independently associated with worse concurrent TST and TNO, but not with 12-month stereopsis. Greater 12-month outer retinal layer thickness (ORLT) was associated with better concurrent TNO in an adjusted model (P = 0.029). In eyes with good baseline acuity, longer baseline photoreceptor outer segment (POS) length was the only independent predictor of better 12-month TST.

Conclusion: Stereopsis improved during the 12 months following RFPDT but often remained abnormal, even in eyes with good BCVA. Different structural parameters were associated with stereopsis by disease stage-subretinal fluid extent during active disease and residual outer retinal structure after resolution-and in these good-acuity eyes, pre-treatment outer retinal structure predicted 12-month stereopsis. Together, these findings suggest that stereopsis may capture residual visual dysfunction that is not fully reflected by BCVA.

中枢性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变降低通量光动力治疗后的立体视觉和外视网膜结构:一项为期12个月的研究。
导读:中枢性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSC)在低通量光动力治疗(RFPDT)后解剖解决后双眼功能的变化尚不清楚。我们描述了12个月的立体视觉结果以及相关的临床和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)因素。方法:回顾性单中心研究纳入51例单侧CSC患者的51只眼,采用RFPDT治疗。在基线和3、6、12个月时评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、Titmus立体测试(TST)、TNO立体测试(TNO)和视网膜中央厚度(CRT)。立体视觉(TST和TNO)是主要的纵向结局;其次是BCVA和CRT。用线性混合效应模型评估随时间的变化。使用Spearman相关和多变量线性回归检查基线和并发临床和OCT因素与立体视的关系。结果:3个月后,TST、TNO和BCVA均有明显改善(均为P)。结论:RFPDT后12个月,立体视功能得到改善,但经常保持异常,即使在BCVA良好的眼睛中也是如此。不同的结构参数与立体视视的疾病分期相关——活动性疾病期间视网膜下液的范围和消退后残留的视网膜外结构——在这些视力良好的眼睛中,治疗前的视网膜外结构预测了12个月的立体视。综上所述,这些发现表明,立体视觉可能捕捉到BCVA未完全反映的残留视觉功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ophthalmology and Therapy OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Ophthalmology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from preclinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of ophthalmological therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Ophthalmology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of ophthalmic therapies. Open Access All articles published by Ophthalmology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Ophthalmology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Ophthalmology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书