Clinical Outcomes of Adding Topical Cetirizine to Minoxidil Therapy in Patients with Androgenetic Alopeci.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2026-09-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_22_26
Fatemeh Mokhtari, Gita Faghihi, Somayeh Maleki, Sayed Mohsen Hosseini, Parvane Sadeghi Dolatabadi
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Adding Topical Cetirizine to Minoxidil Therapy in Patients with Androgenetic Alopeci.","authors":"Fatemeh Mokhtari, Gita Faghihi, Somayeh Maleki, Sayed Mohsen Hosseini, Parvane Sadeghi Dolatabadi","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_22_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding 1% topical cetirizine to 5% topical minoxidil compared with topical minoxidil alone in patients with androgenetic alopecia (AGA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 62 patients with AGA were allocated to receive either topical minoxidil 5% twice daily (monotherapy group, <i>n</i> = 31) or topical minoxidil 5% twice daily plus topical cetirizine 1% once daily (adjunctive therapy group, <i>n</i> = 31) for 16 weeks. Primary outcomes included changes in hair density and hair diameter scores. Secondary outcomes were global photography score, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both groups demonstrated improvement from baseline in hair density and hair diameter scores after 16 weeks of treatment. However, no significant differences were observed between groups in hair density score (0.65 ± 0.61 vs. 0.68 ± 0.60, <i>P</i> = 0.987), hair diameter score (1.29 ± 0.59 vs. 1.39 ± 0.62, <i>P</i> = 0.628), or global photography score (1.00 ± 0.68 vs. 1.06 ± 0.57, <i>P</i> = 0.697). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the adjunctive therapy group than in the monotherapy group (1.82 ± 1.07 vs. 1.13 ± 0.85, <i>P</i> = 0.004). Two cases of local irritation were reported in the monotherapy group, whereas no adverse events were reported in the adjunctive therapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of 1% topical cetirizine to topical minoxidil did not result in superior objective hair-growth outcomes compared with minoxidil alone. Although patient satisfaction was higher among patients receiving adjunctive cetirizine, this finding may be attributable to factors other than a direct pharmacologic effect. Further double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to clarify the role of topical cetirizine in the management of AGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_22_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding 1% topical cetirizine to 5% topical minoxidil compared with topical minoxidil alone in patients with androgenetic alopecia (AGA).

Methods: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 62 patients with AGA were allocated to receive either topical minoxidil 5% twice daily (monotherapy group, n = 31) or topical minoxidil 5% twice daily plus topical cetirizine 1% once daily (adjunctive therapy group, n = 31) for 16 weeks. Primary outcomes included changes in hair density and hair diameter scores. Secondary outcomes were global photography score, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related adverse events.

Findings: Both groups demonstrated improvement from baseline in hair density and hair diameter scores after 16 weeks of treatment. However, no significant differences were observed between groups in hair density score (0.65 ± 0.61 vs. 0.68 ± 0.60, P = 0.987), hair diameter score (1.29 ± 0.59 vs. 1.39 ± 0.62, P = 0.628), or global photography score (1.00 ± 0.68 vs. 1.06 ± 0.57, P = 0.697). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the adjunctive therapy group than in the monotherapy group (1.82 ± 1.07 vs. 1.13 ± 0.85, P = 0.004). Two cases of local irritation were reported in the monotherapy group, whereas no adverse events were reported in the adjunctive therapy group.

Conclusion: The addition of 1% topical cetirizine to topical minoxidil did not result in superior objective hair-growth outcomes compared with minoxidil alone. Although patient satisfaction was higher among patients receiving adjunctive cetirizine, this finding may be attributable to factors other than a direct pharmacologic effect. Further double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to clarify the role of topical cetirizine in the management of AGA.

外用西替利嗪联合米诺地尔治疗雄激素性脱发的临床疗效。
目的:评价1%西替利嗪加5%米诺地尔与单独使用米诺地尔治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA)的疗效和安全性。方法:在本单盲随机临床试验中,62例AGA患者被分配接受5%米诺地尔每日2次局部治疗(单治疗组,n = 31)或5%米诺地尔每日2次局部治疗加1%西替利嗪每日1次局部治疗(辅助治疗组,n = 31),疗程16周。主要结果包括头发密度和头发直径评分的变化。次要结局是总体摄影评分、患者满意度和治疗相关不良事件。结果:治疗16周后,两组患者的发密度和发径评分均较基线有所改善。但两组间发密度评分(0.65±0.61比0.68±0.60,P = 0.987)、发径评分(1.29±0.59比1.39±0.62,P = 0.628)、全局摄影评分(1.00±0.68比1.06±0.57,P = 0.697)均无显著差异。辅助治疗组患者满意度显著高于单药治疗组(1.82±1.07∶1.13±0.85,P = 0.004)。单药组报告2例局部刺激,而辅助治疗组未报告不良事件。结论:与单独使用米诺地尔相比,在局部米诺地尔的基础上添加1%的西替利嗪并没有带来更好的客观毛发生长结果。虽然接受西替利嗪辅助治疗的患者满意度较高,但这一发现可能是由于直接药理作用以外的因素。进一步的双盲、更大样本量的载体对照研究是有必要的,以阐明局部西替利嗪在AGA管理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书