Evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring outcomes and health care resource utilization in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shannon Gadd, Connor Willis, Ishfaq Rashid, Kyu Yun Park, Kayla Holland, Amy Beal, Carl Asche, Priyanka Ghule, Diana Brixner
{"title":"Evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring outcomes and health care resource utilization in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Shannon Gadd, Connor Willis, Ishfaq Rashid, Kyu Yun Park, Kayla Holland, Amy Beal, Carl Asche, Priyanka Ghule, Diana Brixner","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.10.1215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is well established for insulin-treated diabetes, its utility in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains less studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the short-term clinical and economic outcomes following personal use of CGM in patients with T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective pre-post study enrolled adults with poorly controlled non-insulin-treated T2D (hemoglobin A1c ≥8%; target N = 200) initiating G7 CGM and observed them for 6 months. Primary endpoints were changes in A1c and Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) scores. Glycemic events, health care utilization, and medication use were evaluated in a subgroup with claims data. Baseline was defined as the 3 months before CGM initiation. Changes at 3 and 6 months were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Multivariable analysis of covariance models evaluated A1c change, adjusting for baseline A1c and clinical covariates. ADDQoL was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts and fixed effects for time, whereas Cuzick's test assessed quality-of-life trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 217 enrolled patients, a subgroup of 76 had claims data. Most were White (75%) and male (58%), with mean age 58.3±11.5 years. Baseline median A1c was 8.60% (IQR = 8.20-9.10), and mean A1c was 8.96%±1.24%. Prevalent comorbidities included hyperlipidemia (73%), hypertension (70%), and obesity (44%). A1c significantly decreased at 3 and 6 months after CGM (median: -1.10%, -1.40%; mean: -1.28%, -1.42%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). In adjusted models, the adjusted mean change in A1c from baseline was -1.32 percentage points at 3 months (95% CI = -1.48 to -1.15; <i>P</i> < 0.001; n = 153) and -1.48 percentage points at 6 months (95% CI = -1.68 to -1.28; <i>P</i> < 0.001; n = 143). American Diabetes Association (ADA) (<7%) and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) (<8%) target attainment improved from 0% at baseline to 26.4% and 50.9% at 6 months (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hyperglycemic events declined from 53.7% at baseline to 16.3% at 6 months, although not significantly. No significant changes were observed in health care utilization, medication adherence, or medication burden. Greater CGM use and higher time in range were associated with improved A1c and glucose management indicator outcomes. The proportion reporting good-to-excellent quality of life increased from 24.1% at baseline to 45.8% at 6 months, while weighted ADDQoL scores remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGM use in non-insulin-treated patients with T2D was associated with significant improvements in glycemic control and perceived quality of life, with stable health care utilization and medication therapy. These findings support expanded implementation and reimbursement of CGM in this population, but further research is required to assess the long-term sustainability of these improvements and the specific roles of diet, medication, and adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"32 10","pages":"1215-1226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.10.1215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is well established for insulin-treated diabetes, its utility in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains less studied.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term clinical and economic outcomes following personal use of CGM in patients with T2D.

Methods: This prospective pre-post study enrolled adults with poorly controlled non-insulin-treated T2D (hemoglobin A1c ≥8%; target N = 200) initiating G7 CGM and observed them for 6 months. Primary endpoints were changes in A1c and Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) scores. Glycemic events, health care utilization, and medication use were evaluated in a subgroup with claims data. Baseline was defined as the 3 months before CGM initiation. Changes at 3 and 6 months were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Multivariable analysis of covariance models evaluated A1c change, adjusting for baseline A1c and clinical covariates. ADDQoL was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts and fixed effects for time, whereas Cuzick's test assessed quality-of-life trends.

Results: Of 217 enrolled patients, a subgroup of 76 had claims data. Most were White (75%) and male (58%), with mean age 58.3±11.5 years. Baseline median A1c was 8.60% (IQR = 8.20-9.10), and mean A1c was 8.96%±1.24%. Prevalent comorbidities included hyperlipidemia (73%), hypertension (70%), and obesity (44%). A1c significantly decreased at 3 and 6 months after CGM (median: -1.10%, -1.40%; mean: -1.28%, -1.42%; P < 0.001). In adjusted models, the adjusted mean change in A1c from baseline was -1.32 percentage points at 3 months (95% CI = -1.48 to -1.15; P < 0.001; n = 153) and -1.48 percentage points at 6 months (95% CI = -1.68 to -1.28; P < 0.001; n = 143). American Diabetes Association (ADA) (<7%) and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) (<8%) target attainment improved from 0% at baseline to 26.4% and 50.9% at 6 months (both P < 0.001). Hyperglycemic events declined from 53.7% at baseline to 16.3% at 6 months, although not significantly. No significant changes were observed in health care utilization, medication adherence, or medication burden. Greater CGM use and higher time in range were associated with improved A1c and glucose management indicator outcomes. The proportion reporting good-to-excellent quality of life increased from 24.1% at baseline to 45.8% at 6 months, while weighted ADDQoL scores remained stable.

Conclusions: CGM use in non-insulin-treated patients with T2D was associated with significant improvements in glycemic control and perceived quality of life, with stable health care utilization and medication therapy. These findings support expanded implementation and reimbursement of CGM in this population, but further research is required to assess the long-term sustainability of these improvements and the specific roles of diet, medication, and adherence.

非胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测结果和医疗资源利用的评价
背景:尽管连续血糖监测(CGM)在胰岛素治疗的糖尿病中已经建立,但其在非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(T2D)中的应用研究仍然较少。目的:评价个人使用CGM治疗T2D患者的短期临床和经济效果。方法:这项前瞻性研究招募了控制不良的非胰岛素治疗T2D(血红蛋白A1c≥8%,目标N = 200)的成人,开始G7 CGM,观察他们6个月。主要终点是糖化血红蛋白和糖尿病依赖生活质量(ADDQoL)评分的变化。在一个有索赔数据的亚组中评估血糖事件、医疗保健利用和药物使用。基线定义为CGM开始前3个月。使用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验评估3和6个月时的变化。协方差模型的多变量分析评估了A1c的变化,调整了基线A1c和临床协变量。ADDQoL使用线性混合效应模型进行分析,随机截距和固定时间效应,而Cuzick测试评估生活质量趋势。结果:在217名入组患者中,76人有索赔数据。以白人(75%)和男性(58%)居多,平均年龄58.3±11.5岁。基线中位A1c为8.60% (IQR = 8.20-9.10),平均A1c为8.96%±1.24%。常见的合并症包括高脂血症(73%)、高血压(70%)和肥胖(44%)。CGM后3和6个月A1c显著降低(中位数:-1.10%,-1.40%;平均值:-1.28%,-1.42%)P P P P结论:非胰岛素治疗的T2D患者使用CGM与血糖控制和感知生活质量的显著改善相关,且医疗保健利用和药物治疗稳定。这些发现支持在该人群中扩大CGM的实施和报销,但需要进一步的研究来评估这些改善的长期可持续性以及饮食、药物和依从性的具体作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书