Color Stability of Multi-Layered Zirconia Versus Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic: An in Vitro Study.

Q4 Dentistry
Doaa Mohamed Farahat Aboul Azm, Roqaia Mohammad Alassar, Asmaa Ahmed Mosleh, Noureldeen Mohamed Mohamed, Abdullah Waheed Faseeh, Abdelrhman Mohamed Ashour, Farag Rashed Saied
{"title":"Color Stability of Multi-Layered Zirconia Versus Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic: An in Vitro Study.","authors":"Doaa Mohamed Farahat Aboul Azm, Roqaia Mohammad Alassar, Asmaa Ahmed Mosleh, Noureldeen Mohamed Mohamed, Abdullah Waheed Faseeh, Abdelrhman Mohamed Ashour, Farag Rashed Saied","doi":"10.34172/joddd.44008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients who receive ceramic restorations use daily oral care products or plaque-control agents, which may cause discoloration of these restorations. The present study assessed the color stability of multi-layered zirconia and lithium disilicate pressable ceramic after 28 days of immersion in chlorhexidine, coffee, and soda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A disc measuring 2 mm in thickness and 10 mm in diameter was designed to fabricate 30 discs, divided into two groups based on the ceramic material: multi-layered (ML) zirconia and lithium disilicate (LD). Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups based on the staining solution: chlorhexidine, Cola, and coffee. The samples were immersed in staining liquids at room temperature for 28 days. Color was measured immediately at t<sub>0</sub> and every week (t<sub>1</sub>, t<sub>2</sub>, t<sub>3</sub>, and t<sub>4</sub>) using a spectrophotometer. Color changes were calculated. For pairwise comparisons, the Friedman test was first employed, followed by post hoc tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The greatest ∆E was observed in LD specimens immersed in chlorhexidine (5.65), followed by LD specimens immersed in coffee (5.44). The lowest ∆E was observed for ML zirconia specimens immersed in coffee (0.64). Significant differences were observed between ∆E values of all tested groups and subgroups (<i>P</i>≤0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML zirconia exhibited significantly higher color stability than LD pressable ceramic after being subjected to simulated 28 months of beverage consumption and using chlorhexidine.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Multi-layered zirconia exhibited higher resistance to discoloration than lithium disilicate pressable ceramic. Dental professionals should inform patients about the effects of chlorhexidine, Cola, and coffee on lithium disilicate pressable restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"20 2","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13616828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.44008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients who receive ceramic restorations use daily oral care products or plaque-control agents, which may cause discoloration of these restorations. The present study assessed the color stability of multi-layered zirconia and lithium disilicate pressable ceramic after 28 days of immersion in chlorhexidine, coffee, and soda.

Methods: A disc measuring 2 mm in thickness and 10 mm in diameter was designed to fabricate 30 discs, divided into two groups based on the ceramic material: multi-layered (ML) zirconia and lithium disilicate (LD). Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups based on the staining solution: chlorhexidine, Cola, and coffee. The samples were immersed in staining liquids at room temperature for 28 days. Color was measured immediately at t0 and every week (t1, t2, t3, and t4) using a spectrophotometer. Color changes were calculated. For pairwise comparisons, the Friedman test was first employed, followed by post hoc tests.

Results: The greatest ∆E was observed in LD specimens immersed in chlorhexidine (5.65), followed by LD specimens immersed in coffee (5.44). The lowest ∆E was observed for ML zirconia specimens immersed in coffee (0.64). Significant differences were observed between ∆E values of all tested groups and subgroups (P≤0.05).

Conclusion: ML zirconia exhibited significantly higher color stability than LD pressable ceramic after being subjected to simulated 28 months of beverage consumption and using chlorhexidine.

Clinical significance: Multi-layered zirconia exhibited higher resistance to discoloration than lithium disilicate pressable ceramic. Dental professionals should inform patients about the effects of chlorhexidine, Cola, and coffee on lithium disilicate pressable restorations.

多层氧化锆与二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的颜色稳定性:体外研究。
简介:接受陶瓷修复的患者使用日常口腔护理产品或牙菌斑控制剂,这可能导致这些修复体变色。本研究评估了多层氧化锆和二硅酸锂可压陶瓷在氯己定、咖啡和苏打水中浸泡28天后的颜色稳定性。方法:设计厚度为2mm,直径为10mm的陶瓷片,制作30个陶瓷片,根据陶瓷材料分为两组:多层氧化锆(ML)和二硅酸锂(LD)。每组根据染色溶液进一步细分为三个亚组:氯己定、可乐和咖啡。在室温下将样品浸泡在染色液中28天。在t0和每周(t1, t2, t3和t4)使用分光光度计立即测量颜色。计算颜色变化。对于两两比较,首先采用弗里德曼检验,然后是事后检验。结果:洗必泰浸泡的LD标本∆E最大(5.65),其次是咖啡浸泡的LD标本(5.44)。浸泡在咖啡中的ML氧化锆标本的∆E最低(0.64)。各试验组与亚组间的∆E值差异有统计学意义(P≤0.05)。结论:经过28个月的模拟饮料饮用和氯己定处理后,ML氧化锆的颜色稳定性明显高于LD可压陶瓷。临床意义:多层氧化锆比二硅酸锂可压陶瓷具有更高的抗变色能力。牙科专业人员应告知患者氯己定、可乐和咖啡对二硅酸锂可压修复体的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书