EfficientNetB5-Based Deep Learning for Automated Cancer Detection in Tissue Microarray Images.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2026-09-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.7150/jca.139302
Kuo-Wang Tsai, Bach-Tung Pham, Ching-Feng Cheng, Chun-Fan Lung, Wenny Ramadha Putri, Farchan Raswa, Jia-Ching Wang, Yi-Chiung Hsu
{"title":"EfficientNetB5-Based Deep Learning for Automated Cancer Detection in Tissue Microarray Images.","authors":"Kuo-Wang Tsai, Bach-Tung Pham, Ching-Feng Cheng, Chun-Fan Lung, Wenny Ramadha Putri, Farchan Raswa, Jia-Ching Wang, Yi-Chiung Hsu","doi":"10.7150/jca.139302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tissue microarray (TMA) technology is pivotal in cancer research, enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple samples on a single slide. Manual analysis of TMA images remains time-consuming and subjective. This study aimed to develop a robust deep learning model to automate TMA image analysis, enhance accuracy, and support cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the EfficientNetB5 deep learning architecture to classify TMA images from the DigitalSlide01 v1_1M01 dataset, comprising breast cancer, Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC), and gastric cancer samples. Data augmentation methods, including Mix-Up and Cut-Mix, were employed to improve generalization. Preprocessing involved Otsu thresholding and smart bounding box cropping. The model was trained over 80 epochs using the Adam optimizer, a learning rate scheduler, and categorical cross-entropy loss. Performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and a separate test set, with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score as the primary metrics. Performance was further examined using physical-array-held-out and sample-level analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 10 cross-validation validation folds, mean accuracy and F1-score were 85.93% and 82.78%, respectively. Across the separate test-set evaluations by the ten fold-specific models, mean accuracy and F1-score were 80.08% and 75.13%, respectively. In the sample-level analysis, a 10-model mean-probability ensemble achieved 87.80% accuracy and 78.18% macro F1-score on the 246-core test subset. Cancer precision was 100.00% in the reported ensemble analysis, indicating that no Normal or Others samples were observed among samples predicted as Cancer; this does not imply that all Cancer samples were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EfficientNetB5-based framework showed useful aggregate classification performance. These findings support the feasibility of automated TMA image classification and emphasize the need for source-balanced external multicenter validation before broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"17 10","pages":"1821-1828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.139302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tissue microarray (TMA) technology is pivotal in cancer research, enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple samples on a single slide. Manual analysis of TMA images remains time-consuming and subjective. This study aimed to develop a robust deep learning model to automate TMA image analysis, enhance accuracy, and support cancer diagnosis.

Methods: We utilized the EfficientNetB5 deep learning architecture to classify TMA images from the DigitalSlide01 v1_1M01 dataset, comprising breast cancer, Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC), and gastric cancer samples. Data augmentation methods, including Mix-Up and Cut-Mix, were employed to improve generalization. Preprocessing involved Otsu thresholding and smart bounding box cropping. The model was trained over 80 epochs using the Adam optimizer, a learning rate scheduler, and categorical cross-entropy loss. Performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and a separate test set, with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score as the primary metrics. Performance was further examined using physical-array-held-out and sample-level analyses.

Results: Across the 10 cross-validation validation folds, mean accuracy and F1-score were 85.93% and 82.78%, respectively. Across the separate test-set evaluations by the ten fold-specific models, mean accuracy and F1-score were 80.08% and 75.13%, respectively. In the sample-level analysis, a 10-model mean-probability ensemble achieved 87.80% accuracy and 78.18% macro F1-score on the 246-core test subset. Cancer precision was 100.00% in the reported ensemble analysis, indicating that no Normal or Others samples were observed among samples predicted as Cancer; this does not imply that all Cancer samples were detected.

Conclusions: The EfficientNetB5-based framework showed useful aggregate classification performance. These findings support the feasibility of automated TMA image classification and emphasize the need for source-balanced external multicenter validation before broader clinical application.

基于高效netb5的深度学习在组织微阵列图像中自动检测癌症。
背景:组织微阵列(TMA)技术在癌症研究中至关重要,它可以在一张载玻片上同时分析多个样本。人工分析TMA图像仍然耗时且主观。本研究旨在开发一个强大的深度学习模型来自动化TMA图像分析,提高准确性,并支持癌症诊断。方法:利用EfficientNetB5深度学习架构对DigitalSlide01 v1_1M01数据集中的TMA图像进行分类,包括乳腺癌、上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)和胃癌样本。数据增强方法包括Mix-Up和Cut-Mix,以提高泛化。预处理包括Otsu阈值分割和智能边界框裁剪。使用Adam优化器、学习率调度器和分类交叉熵损失对模型进行了超过80次的训练。使用10倍交叉验证和单独的测试集评估性能,以准确性、精密度、召回率和f1评分为主要指标。使用物理阵列负载和样本级分析进一步检查了性能。结果:10个交叉验证验证折叠中,平均正确率为85.93%,f1评分为82.78%。在10倍特异性模型的单独测试集评估中,平均准确率和f1得分分别为80.08%和75.13%。在样本水平分析中,10个模型的平均概率集成在246个核心测试子集上获得了87.80%的准确率和78.18%的宏观f1得分。在报告的集合分析中,癌症精度为100.00%,表明在预测为癌症的样本中没有观察到正常或其他样本;这并不意味着所有的癌症样本都被检测到了。结论:基于effentnetb5的框架显示了有用的聚合分类性能。这些发现支持了自动TMA图像分类的可行性,并强调了在更广泛的临床应用之前需要进行源平衡的外部多中心验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer
Journal of Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
333
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书