Reducing Clinical Waste in Flexible Cystoscopy: A Prospective Quality Improvement Study.

Q3 Medicine
Irish medical journal Pub Date : 2026-09-28
A Tittawella, C Bohonos, D Surgue, J McDermott, D B Hennessey
{"title":"Reducing Clinical Waste in Flexible Cystoscopy: A Prospective Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"A Tittawella, C Bohonos, D Surgue, J McDermott, D B Hennessey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Flexible cystoscopy is a very common procedure that relies heavily on single-use consumables, resulting in significant procedural waste. This study aimed to evaluate whether a targeted waste-segregation intervention could reduce clinical waste generation during flexible cystoscopy without compromising clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective audit of 50 consecutive diagnostic flexible cystoscopies performed at a tertiary urology centre was undertaken. Twenty-five procedures were evaluated before intervention, followed by structured contamination-based waste segregation training for clinical staff and a re-audit of 25 post-intervention procedures. Total procedural waste was weighed in grams, and individual disposable items were classified as clinical or domestic waste to determine segregation accuracy. The annual environmental and financial impact was modelled using institutional procedural volume, disposal costs, and a standard CO₂ conversion factor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean waste weight decreased from 994.4 g pre-intervention to 472.4 g post-intervention, representing a 52.5% reduction. Segregation accuracy improved from 0% to 53%, with 17 of 32 routinely used, non-contaminated items correctly diverted into domestic waste post-intervention. For a service performing 2,000 cystoscopies annually, this equates to approximately 1,044 kg less clinical waste, 1,138 kg lower CO₂ emissions and an estimated disposal cost saving of €1,930.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Behaviour-focused segregation training halved total waste generated during flexible cystoscopy and deliver measurable environmental and financial benefits without altering consumables, workflow or infection control practice. This represents a scalable, low-cost sustainability strategy for outpatient urology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14713,"journal":{"name":"Irish medical journal","volume":"119 8","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Flexible cystoscopy is a very common procedure that relies heavily on single-use consumables, resulting in significant procedural waste. This study aimed to evaluate whether a targeted waste-segregation intervention could reduce clinical waste generation during flexible cystoscopy without compromising clinical practice.

Methods: A prospective audit of 50 consecutive diagnostic flexible cystoscopies performed at a tertiary urology centre was undertaken. Twenty-five procedures were evaluated before intervention, followed by structured contamination-based waste segregation training for clinical staff and a re-audit of 25 post-intervention procedures. Total procedural waste was weighed in grams, and individual disposable items were classified as clinical or domestic waste to determine segregation accuracy. The annual environmental and financial impact was modelled using institutional procedural volume, disposal costs, and a standard CO₂ conversion factor.

Results: Mean waste weight decreased from 994.4 g pre-intervention to 472.4 g post-intervention, representing a 52.5% reduction. Segregation accuracy improved from 0% to 53%, with 17 of 32 routinely used, non-contaminated items correctly diverted into domestic waste post-intervention. For a service performing 2,000 cystoscopies annually, this equates to approximately 1,044 kg less clinical waste, 1,138 kg lower CO₂ emissions and an estimated disposal cost saving of €1,930.

Discussion: Behaviour-focused segregation training halved total waste generated during flexible cystoscopy and deliver measurable environmental and financial benefits without altering consumables, workflow or infection control practice. This represents a scalable, low-cost sustainability strategy for outpatient urology.

减少柔性膀胱镜检查的临床浪费:一项前瞻性质量改进研究。
目的:柔性膀胱镜检查是一种非常常见的手术,严重依赖一次性耗材,导致严重的手术浪费。本研究旨在评估有针对性的废物分离干预是否可以在不影响临床实践的情况下减少柔性膀胱镜检查过程中的临床废物产生。方法:前瞻性审计50连续诊断柔性膀胱镜在三级泌尿科中心进行。干预前对25项程序进行了评估,随后对临床工作人员进行了结构化的基于污染的废物分类培训,并对25项干预后程序进行了重新审核。总程序性废物以克为单位称重,个别一次性物品被分类为医疗或生活废物,以确定分类的准确性。使用机构程序量、处理成本和标准二氧化碳转换系数对年度环境和财务影响进行了建模。结果:平均废物重量从干预前的994.4 g下降到干预后的472.4 g,减少了52.5%。隔离准确率从0%提高到53%,在干预后,32个常规使用的、未受污染的物品中有17个被正确地转移到生活垃圾中。对于每年进行2,000次膀胱镜检查的服务,这相当于减少约1,044公斤的医疗废物,减少1,138公斤的二氧化碳排放量,估计可节省1,930欧元的处置成本。讨论:以行为为重点的隔离培训将灵活膀胱镜检查产生的废物总量减半,并在不改变耗材、工作流程或感染控制实践的情况下提供可衡量的环境和经济效益。这代表了一个可扩展的,低成本的可持续性战略门诊泌尿外科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish medical journal
Irish medical journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, the Journal of the Medical Association of Ireland and now in its present format, the Irish Medical Journal, has provided the medical community in Ireland with an invaluable service. As one of the leading biomedical publications in Ireland, it has sought to continue the education of medical students and postgraduates through scientific research, review articles and updates on contemporary clinical practices while providing an ongoing forum for medical debate. A measure of our stature is that we are listed in the Index Medicus and issued annually with a citation factor from the Institute for Scientific Information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书