Fasting Duration and Differences Across Routine Laboratory Tests.

IF 26.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sunghwan Shin, Sollip Kim, Shinae Yu, Soo Jin Yoo, Kuenyoul Park, Jeonghyun Chang, Tae-Hyun Um, Chong Rae Cho, Dong Hee Whang
{"title":"Fasting Duration and Differences Across Routine Laboratory Tests.","authors":"Sunghwan Shin, Sollip Kim, Shinae Yu, Soo Jin Yoo, Kuenyoul Park, Jeonghyun Chang, Tae-Hyun Um, Chong Rae Cho, Dong Hee Whang","doi":"10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.4718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Fasting before blood collection is widely practiced to reduce preanalytical variability, yet whether fasting-related differences are clinically meaningful across a broad panel of routine analytes has not been systematically evaluated using clinical data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether fasting duration is associated with routine laboratory test results and whether observed differences exceed established analytical performance specifications (APS).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Retrospective single-center cross-sectional study using laboratory information system data collected between February 2021 and December 2023 from a single 670-bed secondary-care university hospital in the Seoul metropolitan area, Republic of Korea. All samples were drawn from outpatients at the institution's central phlebotomy unit. Participants were adult outpatients (≥18 years) with documented fasting duration. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2024, to July 24, 2026.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Fasting duration derived from the time elapsed between the patient's last meal and blood collection, categorized as less than 8 hours, 8 to 12 hours, and more than 12 hours.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Adjusted means across fasting groups were estimated using linear mixed-effects models with patient-level random intercepts, adjusting for age, sex, and department. Paired within-person analyses among repeatedly tested patients were performed to minimize between-patient confounding. Differences were compared with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine biological variation-based total allowable error. Postprandial trends within the subgroup fasting less than 8 hours were assessed at 30-minute intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final dataset comprised 9 755 547 test results from 101 148 patients across 372 test items. Between-group comparisons identified APS-exceeding differences for 27 analytes. However, only 10 were confirmed in paired within-person analyses, suggesting confounding. Glucose (10.8%), triglycerides (20.1%), γ-glutamyl transferase (14.8%), and lipase (36.4%) were higher with less than 8 hours fasting. No analyte exceeded APS between the 8- to 12-hour and more than 12-hour groups. Within the less than 8-hour subgroup, glucose and lactate decreased significantly with increasing fasting duration, whereas lipid concentrations showed no significant linear trend.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study found that fasting duration was associated with differences exceeding analytical performance specifications for only a few analytes, mainly glucose, triglycerides, γ-glutamyl transferase, and lipase. No estimable within-person difference between the 8- to 12-hour and more than 12-hour groups exceeded an available APS. These findings support analyte-specific rather than uniform fasting requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":14714,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.4718","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Fasting before blood collection is widely practiced to reduce preanalytical variability, yet whether fasting-related differences are clinically meaningful across a broad panel of routine analytes has not been systematically evaluated using clinical data.

Objective: To evaluate whether fasting duration is associated with routine laboratory test results and whether observed differences exceed established analytical performance specifications (APS).

Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective single-center cross-sectional study using laboratory information system data collected between February 2021 and December 2023 from a single 670-bed secondary-care university hospital in the Seoul metropolitan area, Republic of Korea. All samples were drawn from outpatients at the institution's central phlebotomy unit. Participants were adult outpatients (≥18 years) with documented fasting duration. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2024, to July 24, 2026.

Exposure: Fasting duration derived from the time elapsed between the patient's last meal and blood collection, categorized as less than 8 hours, 8 to 12 hours, and more than 12 hours.

Main outcomes and measures: Adjusted means across fasting groups were estimated using linear mixed-effects models with patient-level random intercepts, adjusting for age, sex, and department. Paired within-person analyses among repeatedly tested patients were performed to minimize between-patient confounding. Differences were compared with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine biological variation-based total allowable error. Postprandial trends within the subgroup fasting less than 8 hours were assessed at 30-minute intervals.

Results: The final dataset comprised 9 755 547 test results from 101 148 patients across 372 test items. Between-group comparisons identified APS-exceeding differences for 27 analytes. However, only 10 were confirmed in paired within-person analyses, suggesting confounding. Glucose (10.8%), triglycerides (20.1%), γ-glutamyl transferase (14.8%), and lipase (36.4%) were higher with less than 8 hours fasting. No analyte exceeded APS between the 8- to 12-hour and more than 12-hour groups. Within the less than 8-hour subgroup, glucose and lactate decreased significantly with increasing fasting duration, whereas lipid concentrations showed no significant linear trend.

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study found that fasting duration was associated with differences exceeding analytical performance specifications for only a few analytes, mainly glucose, triglycerides, γ-glutamyl transferase, and lipase. No estimable within-person difference between the 8- to 12-hour and more than 12-hour groups exceeded an available APS. These findings support analyte-specific rather than uniform fasting requirements.

空腹时间和常规实验室检查的差异。
重要性:采血前禁食是一种广泛的做法,以减少分析前的变异性,然而,在广泛的常规分析中,禁食相关的差异是否具有临床意义尚未使用临床数据进行系统评估。目的:评估禁食时间是否与常规实验室检测结果相关,以及观察到的差异是否超出了既定的分析性能规范(APS)。设计、环境和参与者:回顾性单中心横断面研究,使用2021年2月至2023年12月从韩国首尔市区一家拥有670张床位的二级大学医院收集的实验室信息系统数据。所有样本均来自该机构中央静脉切开术部门的门诊患者。参与者为有禁食记录的成年门诊患者(≥18岁)。数据分析时间为2024年1月1日至2026年7月24日。暴露:空腹时间由患者最后一餐到采血之间的时间得出,分为少于8小时、8至12小时和超过12小时。主要结果和测量方法:使用线性混合效应模型和患者水平随机截距,对年龄、性别和科室进行调整,估计空腹组调整后的平均值。在重复测试的患者中进行配对的人内分析,以尽量减少患者之间的混淆。将差异与欧洲临床化学和实验室医学联合会基于生物变异的总允许误差进行比较。在禁食少于8小时的亚组中,每隔30分钟评估一次餐后趋势。结果:最终数据集包括来自101 148名患者的9 755 547个测试结果,涉及372个测试项目。组间比较发现27种分析物存在aps超标差异。然而,在配对的人体内分析中,只有10个被证实,这表明存在混淆。葡萄糖(10.8%)、甘油三酯(20.1%)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(14.8%)和脂肪酶(36.4%)在禁食少于8小时时升高。在8至12小时组和超过12小时组之间,没有分析物超过APS。在小于8小时的亚组中,葡萄糖和乳酸随着禁食时间的增加而显著下降,而脂质浓度没有明显的线性趋势。结论和相关性:这项横断面研究发现,禁食时间与几种分析物的差异超过分析性能规范有关,主要是葡萄糖、甘油三酯、γ-谷氨酰转移酶和脂肪酶。8至12小时组和超过12小时组之间没有可估计的人内差异超过可用的APS。这些发现支持特定分析物而不是统一的禁食要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Internal Medicine
JAMA Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
43.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: JAMA Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal committed to advancing the field of internal medicine worldwide. With a focus on four core priorities—clinical relevance, clinical practice change, credibility, and effective communication—the journal aims to provide indispensable and trustworthy peer-reviewed evidence. Catering to academics, clinicians, educators, researchers, and trainees across the entire spectrum of internal medicine, including general internal medicine and subspecialties, JAMA Internal Medicine publishes innovative and clinically relevant research. The journal strives to deliver stimulating articles that educate and inform readers with the latest research findings, driving positive change in healthcare systems and patient care delivery. As a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed medical publications, JAMA Internal Medicine plays a pivotal role in shaping the discourse and advancing patient care in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书