Application of synthetic computed tomography based on a deep learning model in pelvic radiotherapy planning: A feasibility study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Feng Lin, Jinyan Hu, Zhao Li, Jun Wang, Wenying Zhang, Aiping Wen, Mao Li, Yunfei Hu, Yang Wang
{"title":"Application of synthetic computed tomography based on a deep learning model in pelvic radiotherapy planning: A feasibility study.","authors":"Feng Lin, Jinyan Hu, Zhao Li, Jun Wang, Wenying Zhang, Aiping Wen, Mao Li, Yunfei Hu, Yang Wang","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While computed tomography (CT) remains an important imaging modality in radiotherapy planning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow, often realized via the generation of synthetic computed tomography (sCT), is desired due to superior soft-tissue contrast and less susceptibility to registration errors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of applying sCT, generated from MRI using a deep learning model, to pelvic radiotherapy planning. By comparing differences between conventional CT and sCT in terms of image quality, dosimetric parameters, and three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, the clinical potential of an MRI-only radiotherapy workflow was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients who underwent both pelvic CT and MRI examinations were retrospectively enrolled. For the same patients, sCT images were generated from the MRI using a pretrained pelvic deep learning model integrated in the syngo.via VB60A software platform. Treatment plans originally created on planning CT (pCT) images were re-calculated on corresponding sCT datasets. Subsequently, the mean absolute error (MAE) of CT numbers, Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) for major structures, dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and major organs at risk (OARs), and 3D dose distributions were compared between plans calculated on pCT and sCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of image quality, sCT demonstrated comparable CT number accuracy with pCT for soft tissue structures, with MAEs ranging from 6.8 to 8.5 Hounsfield units (HU) for the PTV, bladder, and rectum. Higher MAEs were observed for bony structures (femoral heads and bone marrow), with average MAEs ranging between 17 and 19 HU. The DSC was 0.94 ± 0.01 for the right femoral head, 0.93 ± 0.01 for the left femoral head, and 0.85 ± 0.03 for bone marrow. Regarding dosimetric comparison, the mean absolute differences in key dosimetric parameters for the PTV (D98%, D95%, and Dmean) were all below 0.6%, remaining within clinically acceptable limits. Among the OARs, except for relatively large differences for the maximum and minimum doses in the bladder, the mean dose (Dmean) differences for the rectum, femoral heads, and bone marrow were minimal (mean absolute value ≤ 0.34%), indicating high reliability. Analysis of 3D dose distributions using a 2% 2 mm γ criterion revealed an average γ passing rate of 95.92% between sCT and pCT, satisfying routine clinical quality assurance requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of our study demonstrate the feasibility of applying sCT generated from MRI using a deep learning model to pelvic radiotherapy planning. The MRI-only workflow proposed on this basis eliminates systematic errors introduced by CT-MRI image registration, optimizes the clinical workflow, and fully exploits the superior soft-tissue contrast of MRI to improve target delineation accuracy. The proposed approach provides a novel technical paradigm for achieving more precise and efficient individualized radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":"e70829"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While computed tomography (CT) remains an important imaging modality in radiotherapy planning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow, often realized via the generation of synthetic computed tomography (sCT), is desired due to superior soft-tissue contrast and less susceptibility to registration errors.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of applying sCT, generated from MRI using a deep learning model, to pelvic radiotherapy planning. By comparing differences between conventional CT and sCT in terms of image quality, dosimetric parameters, and three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, the clinical potential of an MRI-only radiotherapy workflow was evaluated.

Methods: Fifteen patients who underwent both pelvic CT and MRI examinations were retrospectively enrolled. For the same patients, sCT images were generated from the MRI using a pretrained pelvic deep learning model integrated in the syngo.via VB60A software platform. Treatment plans originally created on planning CT (pCT) images were re-calculated on corresponding sCT datasets. Subsequently, the mean absolute error (MAE) of CT numbers, Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) for major structures, dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and major organs at risk (OARs), and 3D dose distributions were compared between plans calculated on pCT and sCT.

Results: In terms of image quality, sCT demonstrated comparable CT number accuracy with pCT for soft tissue structures, with MAEs ranging from 6.8 to 8.5 Hounsfield units (HU) for the PTV, bladder, and rectum. Higher MAEs were observed for bony structures (femoral heads and bone marrow), with average MAEs ranging between 17 and 19 HU. The DSC was 0.94 ± 0.01 for the right femoral head, 0.93 ± 0.01 for the left femoral head, and 0.85 ± 0.03 for bone marrow. Regarding dosimetric comparison, the mean absolute differences in key dosimetric parameters for the PTV (D98%, D95%, and Dmean) were all below 0.6%, remaining within clinically acceptable limits. Among the OARs, except for relatively large differences for the maximum and minimum doses in the bladder, the mean dose (Dmean) differences for the rectum, femoral heads, and bone marrow were minimal (mean absolute value ≤ 0.34%), indicating high reliability. Analysis of 3D dose distributions using a 2% 2 mm γ criterion revealed an average γ passing rate of 95.92% between sCT and pCT, satisfying routine clinical quality assurance requirements.

Conclusions: The findings of our study demonstrate the feasibility of applying sCT generated from MRI using a deep learning model to pelvic radiotherapy planning. The MRI-only workflow proposed on this basis eliminates systematic errors introduced by CT-MRI image registration, optimizes the clinical workflow, and fully exploits the superior soft-tissue contrast of MRI to improve target delineation accuracy. The proposed approach provides a novel technical paradigm for achieving more precise and efficient individualized radiotherapy.

基于深度学习模型的合成计算机断层扫描在盆腔放疗规划中的应用:可行性研究。
背景:虽然计算机断层扫描(CT)仍然是放疗计划中的重要成像方式,但由于优越的软组织对比度和对配准错误的敏感性较小,通常通过生成合成计算机断层扫描(sCT)来实现仅磁共振成像(MRI)的工作流程是理想的。目的:本研究的目的是探讨利用深度学习模型将MRI生成的sCT应用于盆腔放疗计划的可行性。通过比较常规CT和sCT在图像质量、剂量学参数和三维(3D)剂量分布方面的差异,评估了仅mri放疗工作流程的临床潜力。方法:回顾性分析15例行盆腔CT和MRI检查的患者。对于相同的患者,sCT图像是使用集成在syngo中的预训练骨盆深度学习模型从MRI生成的。通过VB60A软件平台。最初在规划CT (pCT)图像上创建的治疗方案在相应的sCT数据集上重新计算。随后,比较pCT和sCT计算方案的CT数的平均绝对误差(MAE)、主要结构的Dice相似系数(dsc)、计划靶体积(PTV)和主要危险器官(OARs)的剂量-体积直方图(DVH)参数以及三维剂量分布。结果:就图像质量而言,sCT显示出与pCT相当的软组织结构CT数准确性,PTV、膀胱和直肠的MAEs范围为6.8至8.5 Hounsfield单位(HU)。骨结构(股骨头和骨髓)的MAEs较高,平均MAEs在17至19 HU之间。右股骨头DSC为0.94±0.01,左股骨头DSC为0.93±0.01,骨髓DSC为0.85±0.03。在剂量学比较方面,PTV关键剂量学参数的平均绝对差值(D98%、D95%和Dmean)均低于0.6%,仍在临床可接受范围内。在OARs中,除膀胱最大、最小剂量差异较大外,直肠、股骨头、骨髓的平均剂量(Dmean)差异极小(平均绝对值≤0.34%),可靠性较高。使用2% 2 mm γ标准分析三维剂量分布显示,sCT和pCT之间的平均γ合格率为95.92%,满足常规临床质量保证要求。结论:我们的研究结果证明了利用深度学习模型将MRI生成的sCT应用于盆腔放疗计划的可行性。在此基础上提出的全MRI工作流程,消除了CT-MRI图像配准带来的系统误差,优化了临床工作流程,充分利用MRI优越的软组织对比度,提高靶区描绘精度。所提出的方法为实现更精确和有效的个体化放疗提供了一种新的技术范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书