Surgery and tile-based radiation therapy versus surgery and stereotactic radiation for newly diagnosed brain metastases (ROADS): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.

IF 44.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jeffrey S Weinberg, Brandon S Imber, Vincent DiNapoli, Nelson S Moss, Kimberly B Hoang, Fen Wang, Imran Mohiuddin, Akshitkumar M Mistry, Michael A Garcia, Hussein Tawbi, Nitesh V Patel, Huong Pham, Robert Ryan, John Wanebo, Kris Smith, Clark C Chen, Alexandra Paul, Lindsey Sloan, Matthew J Shepard, Ken Tatebe, Colette J Shen, David G Brachman, Angela M Richardson, Linton T Evans, Gregory B Biedermann, Adam Robin, Toral R Patel, Aristotelis Filippidis, Heather Lin, Lola B Chambless, John Dombrowski, Akash J Patel, Sajeel Chowdhary, K Stuart Lee, M Sean Peach, Adam Nowlan, David J McCracken, John Floyd, Fen Xia, Jeremy Rudnick, Jing Li, Debra Nana Yeboa, Frederick F Lang, Rajat J Kudchadker, Mary Frances McAleer, Jeffrey Wefel, Sherise Desiree Ferguson, Ying Yuan, Simon Hanft, Thomas H Beckham
{"title":"Surgery and tile-based radiation therapy versus surgery and stereotactic radiation for newly diagnosed brain metastases (ROADS): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.","authors":"Jeffrey S Weinberg, Brandon S Imber, Vincent DiNapoli, Nelson S Moss, Kimberly B Hoang, Fen Wang, Imran Mohiuddin, Akshitkumar M Mistry, Michael A Garcia, Hussein Tawbi, Nitesh V Patel, Huong Pham, Robert Ryan, John Wanebo, Kris Smith, Clark C Chen, Alexandra Paul, Lindsey Sloan, Matthew J Shepard, Ken Tatebe, Colette J Shen, David G Brachman, Angela M Richardson, Linton T Evans, Gregory B Biedermann, Adam Robin, Toral R Patel, Aristotelis Filippidis, Heather Lin, Lola B Chambless, John Dombrowski, Akash J Patel, Sajeel Chowdhary, K Stuart Lee, M Sean Peach, Adam Nowlan, David J McCracken, John Floyd, Fen Xia, Jeremy Rudnick, Jing Li, Debra Nana Yeboa, Frederick F Lang, Rajat J Kudchadker, Mary Frances McAleer, Jeffrey Wefel, Sherise Desiree Ferguson, Ying Yuan, Simon Hanft, Thomas H Beckham","doi":"10.1200/JCO-26-01894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Post-operative stereotactic radiation (SRT) is the standard-of-care for resected brain metastases. Implantation of cesium-131 collagen tiles (tile-based radiation therapy, TBRT) initiates focal radiation immediately after resection, potentially offering therapeutic and logistical advantages. ROADS: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial (NCT04365374) compared the safety and efficacy of resection with TBRT (R+TBRT) to resection with SRT (R+SRT) for patients with a newly diagnosed brain metastasis indicated for surgical resection.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Across 32 United States centers, patients were pre-operatively randomized 1:1 to resection R+TBRT or R+SRT. Any non-resected brain metastases received SRT post-operatively. Co-primary outcomes were time-to-surgical bed recurrence (SBR) and surgical bed recurrence-free survival (SB-RFS). Outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models with stratification factors as covariates. Multiplicity was controlled by hierarchical testing. Analyses used the pre-specified modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (patients who underwent surgery, had pathologic confirmation of brain metastasis, and had follow-up information).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April 2021 through August 2025, 230 patients were randomized (115 per arm); 204 of whom (103 R+TBRT, 101 R+SRT) comprised the mITT population. Median follow-up was 12.9 months. Median time-to-SBR was not reached (R+TBRT) versus 17.4 months (R+SRT) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.46; p=0.0070). SB-RFS was improved with R+TBRT, with a median of not reached versus 10.9 months (R+SRT) (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.76; p=0.0021). Overall adverse events did not appear to differ: 83 patients (79.0%, 95% CI: 70.0-86.4) (R+TBRT) versus 67 patients (80.7%, 95% CI:70.6-88.6) (R+SRT).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases requiring resection, R+TBRT significantly improved SBR and SB-RFS, demonstrating both non-inferiority and superiority.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"101200JCO2601894"},"PeriodicalIF":44.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-26-01894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Post-operative stereotactic radiation (SRT) is the standard-of-care for resected brain metastases. Implantation of cesium-131 collagen tiles (tile-based radiation therapy, TBRT) initiates focal radiation immediately after resection, potentially offering therapeutic and logistical advantages. ROADS: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial (NCT04365374) compared the safety and efficacy of resection with TBRT (R+TBRT) to resection with SRT (R+SRT) for patients with a newly diagnosed brain metastasis indicated for surgical resection.

Patients and methods: Across 32 United States centers, patients were pre-operatively randomized 1:1 to resection R+TBRT or R+SRT. Any non-resected brain metastases received SRT post-operatively. Co-primary outcomes were time-to-surgical bed recurrence (SBR) and surgical bed recurrence-free survival (SB-RFS). Outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models with stratification factors as covariates. Multiplicity was controlled by hierarchical testing. Analyses used the pre-specified modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (patients who underwent surgery, had pathologic confirmation of brain metastasis, and had follow-up information).

Results: From April 2021 through August 2025, 230 patients were randomized (115 per arm); 204 of whom (103 R+TBRT, 101 R+SRT) comprised the mITT population. Median follow-up was 12.9 months. Median time-to-SBR was not reached (R+TBRT) versus 17.4 months (R+SRT) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.46; p=0.0070). SB-RFS was improved with R+TBRT, with a median of not reached versus 10.9 months (R+SRT) (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.76; p=0.0021). Overall adverse events did not appear to differ: 83 patients (79.0%, 95% CI: 70.0-86.4) (R+TBRT) versus 67 patients (80.7%, 95% CI:70.6-88.6) (R+SRT).

Conclusion: For patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases requiring resection, R+TBRT significantly improved SBR and SB-RFS, demonstrating both non-inferiority and superiority.

手术和基于瓷砖的放射治疗与手术和立体定向放射治疗新诊断的脑转移瘤(ROADS):一项随机,开放标签,3期试验。
目的:术后立体定向放疗(SRT)是切除脑转移瘤的标准治疗方法。植入铯-131胶原瓷砖(基于瓷砖的放射治疗,TBRT)在切除后立即启动局灶放射,可能提供治疗和后勤优势。ROADS:一项随机、开放标签、非效性的3期试验(NCT04365374)比较了新诊断的脑转移患者接受手术切除的TBRT切除(R+TBRT)和SRT切除(R+SRT)的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:在32个美国中心,患者术前按1:1的比例随机分为R+TBRT或R+SRT。所有未切除的脑转移瘤术后均接受SRT治疗。共同主要结局是手术床前复发时间(SBR)和手术床无复发生存时间(SB-RFS)。结果分析采用Cox比例风险模型,分层因素为协变量。多重性由层次检验控制。分析使用预先指定的修改意向治疗(mITT)人群(接受手术、有脑转移病理证实并有随访信息的患者)。结果:从2021年4月到2025年8月,230例患者被随机分组(每组115例);其中204例(103例R+TBRT, 101例R+SRT)构成mITT人群。中位随访时间为12.9个月。未达到sbr的中位时间(R+TBRT)与17.4个月(R+SRT)相比(风险比[HR]: 0.06; 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.01-0.46; p=0.0070)。R+TBRT改善了SB-RFS,中位数未达到10.9个月(R+SRT) (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.76; p=0.0021)。总体不良事件似乎没有差异:83例患者(79.0%,95% CI: 70.0-86.4) (R+TBRT)与67例患者(80.7%,95% CI:70.6-88.6) (R+SRT)。结论:对于新诊断的需要切除的脑转移患者,R+TBRT可显著改善SBR和SB-RFS,具有非劣效性和优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书