Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 23.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ying Chen, Haibo Shi, Mingliang Xiang, Xia Li, Zhili Wang, Wen Lu, Yilin Shen, Yuan Fang, Jie Chen, Lei Guan, Feifan Zhao, Zaichao Wu, Rong Tian, Qiongfei Yu, Kun Han, Haibin Sheng, Shengqi Chen, Jiayu Sun, Guangyu Liu, Hao Wu
{"title":"Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ying Chen, Haibo Shi, Mingliang Xiang, Xia Li, Zhili Wang, Wen Lu, Yilin Shen, Yuan Fang, Jie Chen, Lei Guan, Feifan Zhao, Zaichao Wu, Rong Tian, Qiongfei Yu, Kun Han, Haibin Sheng, Shengqi Chen, Jiayu Sun, Guangyu Liu, Hao Wu","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.3395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Hearing loss is a significant modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline, but the effectiveness of hearing intervention for cognition stabilization or improvement still remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether hearing intervention could reduce dementia-level impairment incidence in older adults with coexisting hearing loss and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted between September 2021 and February 2024, with the 24-month follow-up completed in February 2026. This study was conducted at 3 tertiary otology outpatient clinics and 3 CHOICE cohort community health stations in Shanghai, China. Of 21 908 adults aged 60 years or older assessed for eligibility, 703 participants with coexisting MCI (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.5) and moderate to severe hearing loss were enrolled and randomized. These data were analyzed from February 2026 to July 2026.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either hearing aid intervention (n = 353) or hearing care education (n = 350).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment over 24 months, defined as a CDR global score 1 or more. Key prespecified secondary outcomes comprised rate of cognitive improvement (CDR = 0) and CDR global and domain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 703 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 74.53 [7.16] years; range, 60-96 years; 250 female [35.56%] and 452 male [64.44%]), 610 (86.77%) completed the trial. No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome, in which the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment was 3.09% (95% CI, 1.62%-5.74%) in the intervention group vs 4.74% (95% CI, 2.60%-8.29%) in the control group (risk difference [RD], -2.07%; 95% CI, -4.74% to 0.61%; relative risk [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-1.38; P = .23). Meanwhile, prespecified secondary analysis demonstrated that hearing intervention increased the rate of cognitive improvement (15.34%; 95% CI, 11.84%-19.62% vs 2.36%; 95% CI, 0.99%-5.22%; RD, 12.00%; 95% CI, 8.79%-15.21%; RR, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.46-14.37). No study-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and coexisting hearing loss, a hearing aid intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of dementia-level impairment at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000036139.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.3395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Hearing loss is a significant modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline, but the effectiveness of hearing intervention for cognition stabilization or improvement still remains controversial.

Objective: To investigate whether hearing intervention could reduce dementia-level impairment incidence in older adults with coexisting hearing loss and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted between September 2021 and February 2024, with the 24-month follow-up completed in February 2026. This study was conducted at 3 tertiary otology outpatient clinics and 3 CHOICE cohort community health stations in Shanghai, China. Of 21 908 adults aged 60 years or older assessed for eligibility, 703 participants with coexisting MCI (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.5) and moderate to severe hearing loss were enrolled and randomized. These data were analyzed from February 2026 to July 2026.

Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either hearing aid intervention (n = 353) or hearing care education (n = 350).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment over 24 months, defined as a CDR global score 1 or more. Key prespecified secondary outcomes comprised rate of cognitive improvement (CDR = 0) and CDR global and domain scores.

Results: Among 703 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 74.53 [7.16] years; range, 60-96 years; 250 female [35.56%] and 452 male [64.44%]), 610 (86.77%) completed the trial. No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome, in which the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment was 3.09% (95% CI, 1.62%-5.74%) in the intervention group vs 4.74% (95% CI, 2.60%-8.29%) in the control group (risk difference [RD], -2.07%; 95% CI, -4.74% to 0.61%; relative risk [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-1.38; P = .23). Meanwhile, prespecified secondary analysis demonstrated that hearing intervention increased the rate of cognitive improvement (15.34%; 95% CI, 11.84%-19.62% vs 2.36%; 95% CI, 0.99%-5.22%; RD, 12.00%; 95% CI, 8.79%-15.21%; RR, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.46-14.37). No study-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and coexisting hearing loss, a hearing aid intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of dementia-level impairment at 24 months.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000036139.

老年人轻度认知障碍的听力干预:CHOICE随机临床试验。
重要性:听力损失是认知能力下降的一个重要的可改变的危险因素,但听力干预对认知稳定或改善的有效性仍然存在争议。目的:探讨听力干预是否能降低老年听力损失合并轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者痴呆水平损害的发生率。设计、环境和参与者:该多中心、平行组、开放标签随机临床试验于2021年9月至2024年2月进行,24个月的随访于2026年2月完成。本研究在中国上海的3个三级耳科门诊和3个CHOICE队列社区卫生站进行。在21 908名年龄在60岁或以上的成年人中,703名患有MCI(临床痴呆评分[CDR]全球评分为0.5)和中度至重度听力损失的参与者被纳入并随机分组。这些数据的分析时间为2026年2月至2026年7月。干预措施:参与者按1:1随机分组,接受助听器干预(n = 353)或听力保健教育(n = 350)。主要结局和测量:主要结局是24个月内从MCI到痴呆水平损伤的转换率,定义为CDR总体得分1或更高。关键的预定次要结果包括认知改善率(CDR = 0)和CDR整体和领域得分。结果:703例随机患者(平均[SD]年龄74.53[7.16]岁,年龄范围60-96岁,女性250例[35.56%],男性452例[64.44%])中,有610例(86.77%)完成了试验。主要转归无显著差异,干预组从MCI到痴呆水平损伤的转归率为3.09% (95% CI, 1.62% ~ 5.74%),对照组为4.74% (95% CI, 2.60% ~ 8.29%)(风险差[RD], -2.07%; 95% CI, -4.74% ~ 0.61%;相对危险度[RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25 ~ 1.38; P = 0.23)。同时,预先设定的二次分析显示,听力干预提高了认知改善率(15.34%;95% CI, 11.84%-19.62% vs 2.36%; 95% CI, 0.99%-5.22%; RD, 12.00%; 95% CI, 8.79%-15.21%; RR, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.46-14.37)。没有研究相关不良事件的报道。结论和相关性:在这项研究中,在轻度认知障碍和听力损失并存的老年人中,助听器干预并没有显著降低24个月时痴呆水平损伤的发生率。试验注册:中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2000036139。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书