Effect of supplemental oxygen therapy on 6-min walk distance in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension living at 2850 m: a randomised, crossover trial.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2026-09-28 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.01671-2025
Dinah Hertig, Michael Furian, Mona Lichtblau, Julian Müller, Simon R Schneider, Stéphanie Saxer, Joel Herzig, Meret Bauer, Mirjam Schmucki, Diego Saragoni, Esther I Schwarz, Elizabeth Cajamarca, Rodrigo Hoyos, Silvia Ulrich
{"title":"Effect of supplemental oxygen therapy on 6-min walk distance in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension living at 2850 m: a randomised, crossover trial.","authors":"Dinah Hertig, Michael Furian, Mona Lichtblau, Julian Müller, Simon R Schneider, Stéphanie Saxer, Joel Herzig, Meret Bauer, Mirjam Schmucki, Diego Saragoni, Esther I Schwarz, Elizabeth Cajamarca, Rodrigo Hoyos, Silvia Ulrich","doi":"10.1183/23120541.01671-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) who permanently live at high altitude (>2500 m) face particular challenges due to hypobaric hypoxia, which may exacerbate pulmonary hypertension and impair exercise capacity. We therefore investigated the effect of low-dose supplemental oxygen therapy (SOT) on 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in high-altitude residents diagnosed with PAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults diagnosed with PAH who permanently live at >2500 m performed two 6MWD tests, once with SOT (1-2 L·min<sup>-1</sup> <i>via</i> nasal cannula provided by a portable back-packed concentrator) and once while breathing ambient air (air) at 2850 m according to a randomised, controlled, crossover trial. The primary outcome was the difference in 6MWD between SOT and air. Secondary outcomes were effects of SOT on heart rate, blood pressure and peripheral oxygen saturation (<i>S</i> <sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> ) and Borg scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 patients (86% women, mean±sd age 45±12 years, resting <i>S</i> <sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> 93±3%, mean pulmonary artery pressure 52±16 mmHg, 6MWD at 2850 m 462±100 m) were included. SOT compared to hypoxic air at 2850 m did not improve 6MWD (mean difference -5 m, 95% CI: -24 to 14 m, p=0.576), dyspnoea, leg discomfort or end-exercise <i>S</i> <sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> , but did increase resting <i>S</i> <sub>pO<sub>2</sub></sub> .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In high-altitude residents diagnosed with PAH, low-dose SOT as commonly prescribed <i>via</i> portable concentrator did not improve 6MWD nor dyspnoea perception, most likely due to insufficient flow provided by the concentrator during exercise, further lowered by exertional mouth breathing and the weight of the backpacked concentrator.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01671-2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) who permanently live at high altitude (>2500 m) face particular challenges due to hypobaric hypoxia, which may exacerbate pulmonary hypertension and impair exercise capacity. We therefore investigated the effect of low-dose supplemental oxygen therapy (SOT) on 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in high-altitude residents diagnosed with PAH.

Methods: Adults diagnosed with PAH who permanently live at >2500 m performed two 6MWD tests, once with SOT (1-2 L·min-1 via nasal cannula provided by a portable back-packed concentrator) and once while breathing ambient air (air) at 2850 m according to a randomised, controlled, crossover trial. The primary outcome was the difference in 6MWD between SOT and air. Secondary outcomes were effects of SOT on heart rate, blood pressure and peripheral oxygen saturation (S pO2 ) and Borg scale.

Results: 28 patients (86% women, mean±sd age 45±12 years, resting S pO2 93±3%, mean pulmonary artery pressure 52±16 mmHg, 6MWD at 2850 m 462±100 m) were included. SOT compared to hypoxic air at 2850 m did not improve 6MWD (mean difference -5 m, 95% CI: -24 to 14 m, p=0.576), dyspnoea, leg discomfort or end-exercise S pO2 , but did increase resting S pO2 .

Conclusion: In high-altitude residents diagnosed with PAH, low-dose SOT as commonly prescribed via portable concentrator did not improve 6MWD nor dyspnoea perception, most likely due to insufficient flow provided by the concentrator during exercise, further lowered by exertional mouth breathing and the weight of the backpacked concentrator.

补充氧治疗对生活在2850米的肺动脉高压患者6分钟步行距离的影响:一项随机交叉试验
背景:长期生活在高海拔地区(> ~ 2500 m)的肺动脉高压(PAH)患者由于低压缺氧而面临特殊的挑战,这可能加剧肺动脉高压并损害运动能力。因此,我们研究了低剂量补充氧治疗(SOT)对诊断为PAH的高海拔居民6分钟步行距离(6MWD)的影响。方法:根据一项随机、对照、交叉试验,诊断为PAH且永久居住在bbbb2500米的成年人进行了两次6MWD测试,一次使用SOT (1-2 L·min-1,通过便携式背囊浓缩器提供的鼻插管),另一次在2850米呼吸环境空气(空气)。主要结果是SOT与空气的6MWD差异。次要结局是SOT对心率、血压、外周血氧饱和度(S pO2)和Borg评分的影响。结果:纳入28例患者(女性86%,平均±sd年龄45±12岁,静息S - pO2 93±3%,平均肺动脉压52±16 mmHg, 6MWD在2850 m 462±100 m)。与2850 m缺氧空气相比,SOT没有改善6MWD(平均差-5 m, 95% CI: -24 ~ 14 m, p=0.576)、呼吸困难、腿部不适或运动结束时的S pO2,但确实增加了静息S pO2。结论:在诊断为PAH的高海拔居民中,通常通过便携式浓缩器处方的低剂量SOT并没有改善6MWD和呼吸困难感觉,这很可能是由于运动时浓缩器提供的流量不足,通过用力口呼吸和背包浓缩器的重量进一步降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书