Beyond risk scores: artificial intelligence representations of physiological resilience in surgical patients.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
John Whittle, Evangelos Mazomenos
{"title":"Beyond risk scores: artificial intelligence representations of physiological resilience in surgical patients.","authors":"John Whittle, Evangelos Mazomenos","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.08.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current perioperative risk assessment relies largely on static models that estimate the probability of adverse outcomes using indirect, population-level proxies of physiological reserve. We argue that physiological resilience is better understood as an emergent, dynamic property of interacting biological systems, expressed within the broader context of surgical stress, anaesthetic care, and perioperative management. Modern artificial intelligence and machine learning architectures offer a paradigm shift, moving perioperative medicine beyond static risk calculators toward dynamic, multimodal representations of physiological state over time. Such representations provide the substrate for prescriptive analytics, actionable clinical decision support, and mechanism-informed perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.08.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current perioperative risk assessment relies largely on static models that estimate the probability of adverse outcomes using indirect, population-level proxies of physiological reserve. We argue that physiological resilience is better understood as an emergent, dynamic property of interacting biological systems, expressed within the broader context of surgical stress, anaesthetic care, and perioperative management. Modern artificial intelligence and machine learning architectures offer a paradigm shift, moving perioperative medicine beyond static risk calculators toward dynamic, multimodal representations of physiological state over time. Such representations provide the substrate for prescriptive analytics, actionable clinical decision support, and mechanism-informed perioperative care.

风险评分之外:外科患者生理弹性的人工智能表征。
目前的围手术期风险评估主要依赖于静态模型,该模型使用间接的、人群水平的生理储备指标来估计不良后果的概率。我们认为,生理弹性可以更好地理解为相互作用的生物系统的一种新兴的动态特性,在手术应激、麻醉护理和围手术期管理的更广泛背景下表达。现代人工智能和机器学习架构提供了一种范式转变,使围手术期医学从静态风险计算器转向动态的、多模态的生理状态表征。这些表征为规范分析、可操作的临床决策支持和机制知情的围手术期护理提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书