Antiemetic doses of dexamethasone do not affect pulmonary complications after noncardiac surgery: a matter of pathophysiology?

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Elena Ahrens, Maximilian S Schaefer
{"title":"Antiemetic doses of dexamethasone do not affect pulmonary complications after noncardiac surgery: a matter of pathophysiology?","authors":"Elena Ahrens, Maximilian S Schaefer","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain common and are exacerbated by perioperative systemic inflammation. Dexamethasone, administered to millions of patients each year for prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting, effectively attenuates systemic inflammatory responses, rendering it a plausible adjunct for PPC prevention. In a recent issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia, Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues present a well-designed secondary analysis of the individualised, perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy trials showing that antiemetic doses of dexamethasone (4-8 mg i.v.) did not reduce patients' risk of PPCs. In the underlying iPROVE (Individualised, Perioperative Open-Lung Ventilation Strategy) studies, other landmark trials, and clinical routine practice across general patient populations, the key driver and major contributor to PPCs is perioperative atelectasis, which is predominantly determined by surgery, induction of general anaesthesia, and ventilatory management rather than systemic inflammation. The findings by Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues emphasise the importance of differentiating the pathophysiological pathway of composite clinical outcomes including PPCs when designing preventive strategies, while reaffirming the established safety of dexamethasone at standard doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.09.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain common and are exacerbated by perioperative systemic inflammation. Dexamethasone, administered to millions of patients each year for prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting, effectively attenuates systemic inflammatory responses, rendering it a plausible adjunct for PPC prevention. In a recent issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia, Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues present a well-designed secondary analysis of the individualised, perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy trials showing that antiemetic doses of dexamethasone (4-8 mg i.v.) did not reduce patients' risk of PPCs. In the underlying iPROVE (Individualised, Perioperative Open-Lung Ventilation Strategy) studies, other landmark trials, and clinical routine practice across general patient populations, the key driver and major contributor to PPCs is perioperative atelectasis, which is predominantly determined by surgery, induction of general anaesthesia, and ventilatory management rather than systemic inflammation. The findings by Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues emphasise the importance of differentiating the pathophysiological pathway of composite clinical outcomes including PPCs when designing preventive strategies, while reaffirming the established safety of dexamethasone at standard doses.

止吐剂量的地塞米松不会影响非心脏手术后的肺部并发症:病理生理学问题?
术后肺部并发症(PPCs)仍然很常见,并因围手术期全身炎症而加重。地塞米松每年用于预防数百万患者术后恶心和呕吐,有效减轻全身炎症反应,使其成为预防PPC的合理辅助药物。在最近一期的《英国麻醉杂志》上,Zorrilla-Vaca和他的同事提出了一项精心设计的个体化围手术期开肺通气策略试验的二次分析,显示抗吐剂量的地塞米松(4- 8mg静脉注射)并没有降低患者PPCs的风险。在潜在的iPROVE(个体化围手术期开肺通气策略)研究、其他具有里程碑意义的试验和一般患者群体的临床常规实践中,PPCs的关键驱动因素和主要因素是围手术期肺不张,这主要由手术、全身麻醉诱导和通气管理决定,而不是全身性炎症。Zorrilla-Vaca及其同事的研究结果强调了在设计预防策略时区分包括PPCs在内的复合临床结果的病理生理途径的重要性,同时重申了标准剂量地塞米松的既定安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书