{"title":"Antiemetic doses of dexamethasone do not affect pulmonary complications after noncardiac surgery: a matter of pathophysiology?","authors":"Elena Ahrens, Maximilian S Schaefer","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain common and are exacerbated by perioperative systemic inflammation. Dexamethasone, administered to millions of patients each year for prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting, effectively attenuates systemic inflammatory responses, rendering it a plausible adjunct for PPC prevention. In a recent issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia, Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues present a well-designed secondary analysis of the individualised, perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy trials showing that antiemetic doses of dexamethasone (4-8 mg i.v.) did not reduce patients' risk of PPCs. In the underlying iPROVE (Individualised, Perioperative Open-Lung Ventilation Strategy) studies, other landmark trials, and clinical routine practice across general patient populations, the key driver and major contributor to PPCs is perioperative atelectasis, which is predominantly determined by surgery, induction of general anaesthesia, and ventilatory management rather than systemic inflammation. The findings by Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues emphasise the importance of differentiating the pathophysiological pathway of composite clinical outcomes including PPCs when designing preventive strategies, while reaffirming the established safety of dexamethasone at standard doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.09.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain common and are exacerbated by perioperative systemic inflammation. Dexamethasone, administered to millions of patients each year for prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting, effectively attenuates systemic inflammatory responses, rendering it a plausible adjunct for PPC prevention. In a recent issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia, Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues present a well-designed secondary analysis of the individualised, perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy trials showing that antiemetic doses of dexamethasone (4-8 mg i.v.) did not reduce patients' risk of PPCs. In the underlying iPROVE (Individualised, Perioperative Open-Lung Ventilation Strategy) studies, other landmark trials, and clinical routine practice across general patient populations, the key driver and major contributor to PPCs is perioperative atelectasis, which is predominantly determined by surgery, induction of general anaesthesia, and ventilatory management rather than systemic inflammation. The findings by Zorrilla-Vaca and colleagues emphasise the importance of differentiating the pathophysiological pathway of composite clinical outcomes including PPCs when designing preventive strategies, while reaffirming the established safety of dexamethasone at standard doses.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.