Impact of Preoperative Image Sharing and Anatomical Suitability on EVAR Outcomes for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

IF 0.5 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Annals of vascular diseases Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-19 DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.26-00086
Yuki Hashimoto, Shinsuke Kikuchi, Yuri Yoshida, Hirofumi Jinno, Noriyuki Yokoyama, Daichi Mizushima, Tsutomu Doita, Takayuki Uramoto, Kazuki Takahashi, Seima Ohira, Keisuke Kamada, Takamitsu Tatsukawa, Naoya Kuriyama, Seiko Tanaka, Akihito Tampo, Motoi Okada, Ami Sugawara, Kenichi Takahoko, Yoshiko Onodera, Atsushi Kurosawa, Hiroshi Makino, Daiki Uchida, Nobuyoshi Azuma
{"title":"Impact of Preoperative Image Sharing and Anatomical Suitability on EVAR Outcomes for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.","authors":"Yuki Hashimoto, Shinsuke Kikuchi, Yuri Yoshida, Hirofumi Jinno, Noriyuki Yokoyama, Daichi Mizushima, Tsutomu Doita, Takayuki Uramoto, Kazuki Takahashi, Seima Ohira, Keisuke Kamada, Takamitsu Tatsukawa, Naoya Kuriyama, Seiko Tanaka, Akihito Tampo, Motoi Okada, Ami Sugawara, Kenichi Takahoko, Yoshiko Onodera, Atsushi Kurosawa, Hiroshi Makino, Daiki Uchida, Nobuyoshi Azuma","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.26-00086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The influence of anatomical suitability on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) remains uncertain. This study evaluated the association between adherence to device instructions for use (IFU) and clinical outcomes after EVAR for rAAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 31 consecutive patients who underwent emergency EVAR for rAAA between August 2016 and June 2023. Anatomical suitability was assessed by retrospective computed tomography, and patients were classified as inside or outside IFU. The influence of preoperative image sharing (JOIN; Allm, Tokyo, Japan) on perioperative workflow was also evaluated, with patients divided into image-sharing and non-image-sharing groups. The primary outcome was reintervention; secondary outcomes included 30-day and overall mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients (64.5%) were inside IFU and eleven (35.5%) were outside IFU. Outside-IFU cases had shorter proximal neck length and greater neck angulation. Reintervention was more frequent outside IFU than inside IFU (63.6% vs. 10.0%, p <0.01), whereas 30-day mortality (18.2% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.601) and overall mortality (36.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.300) were not significantly different. Prehospital image sharing using the JOIN application was associated with shorter door-to-operating room time despite longer transfer distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVAR for rAAA may achieve acceptable early survival in selected outside-IFU cases; however, outside-IFU anatomy is associated with increased reintervention. Careful patient-specific selection and structured follow-up are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13616592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.26-00086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The influence of anatomical suitability on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) remains uncertain. This study evaluated the association between adherence to device instructions for use (IFU) and clinical outcomes after EVAR for rAAA.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 31 consecutive patients who underwent emergency EVAR for rAAA between August 2016 and June 2023. Anatomical suitability was assessed by retrospective computed tomography, and patients were classified as inside or outside IFU. The influence of preoperative image sharing (JOIN; Allm, Tokyo, Japan) on perioperative workflow was also evaluated, with patients divided into image-sharing and non-image-sharing groups. The primary outcome was reintervention; secondary outcomes included 30-day and overall mortality.

Results: Twenty patients (64.5%) were inside IFU and eleven (35.5%) were outside IFU. Outside-IFU cases had shorter proximal neck length and greater neck angulation. Reintervention was more frequent outside IFU than inside IFU (63.6% vs. 10.0%, p <0.01), whereas 30-day mortality (18.2% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.601) and overall mortality (36.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.300) were not significantly different. Prehospital image sharing using the JOIN application was associated with shorter door-to-operating room time despite longer transfer distance.

Conclusions: EVAR for rAAA may achieve acceptable early survival in selected outside-IFU cases; however, outside-IFU anatomy is associated with increased reintervention. Careful patient-specific selection and structured follow-up are essential.

术前图像共享和解剖适宜性对腹主动脉瘤破裂EVAR结果的影响。
目的:解剖适宜性对腹主动脉瘤破裂(rAAA)血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)术后预后的影响尚不明确。本研究评估了rAAA患者EVAR后遵守器械使用说明书(IFU)与临床结果之间的关系。方法:我们回顾性分析了2016年8月至2023年6月期间连续31例因rAAA接受急诊EVAR治疗的患者。通过回顾性计算机断层扫描评估解剖适宜性,并将患者分为IFU内或IFU外。评估术前图像共享(JOIN; Allm, Tokyo, Japan)对围手术期工作流程的影响,将患者分为图像共享组和非图像共享组。主要结局为再干预;次要结局包括30天死亡率和总死亡率。结果:IFU内20例(64.5%),IFU外11例(35.5%)。外ifu患者颈近端长度较短,颈成角较大。在IFU外再干预比在IFU内再干预更频繁(63.6%对10.0%,p)结论:在选择的IFU外病例中,EVAR治疗rAAA可能获得可接受的早期生存率;然而,IFU外解剖与再干预增加有关。仔细的患者选择和有组织的随访是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书