John Reilly, Michael Lam, Grant Sara, Ed Heffernan
{"title":"Identifying substance-use disorders in mental health services: Routine practice across an Australian state.","authors":"John Reilly, Michael Lam, Grant Sara, Ed Heffernan","doi":"10.1177/10398562261493840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSubstance-use disorders (SUDs) are commonly seen in mental health services (MHSs) but inaccurate identification contributes to their inconsistent care. This study examines routine SUDs identification in Queensland's adult MHSs.MethodsRoutine completion of four SUDs identification methods in the statewide electronic health record for MHSs was measured over 4 years from November 2018. Prevalence of identified substance-use groups, defined for each measure, was measured and compared across sociodemographic groups in 58,724 adults.ResultsCompletion of specific identification measures varied markedly. Each measure identified different proportions of defined substance-use groups. The measures with specific substance prompts, a screening tool and clinical pathway, identified higher prevalence of harmful use than the measures of diagnosis and an outcome measure, which lack specific prompts.ConclusionsIndividual SUDs identification processes, including diagnosis, were variably completed, with low screening tool completion. They identified markedly different prevalence, higher for more structured tools. Structured specific screening tools may over-identify risk of SUDs. Care of SUDs in adult MHSs could be improved at individual clinician and service levels by clarifying care pathways to better support delivery of structured processes of screening and brief intervention and to enable targeted assessment and accurate diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562261493840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562261493840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundSubstance-use disorders (SUDs) are commonly seen in mental health services (MHSs) but inaccurate identification contributes to their inconsistent care. This study examines routine SUDs identification in Queensland's adult MHSs.MethodsRoutine completion of four SUDs identification methods in the statewide electronic health record for MHSs was measured over 4 years from November 2018. Prevalence of identified substance-use groups, defined for each measure, was measured and compared across sociodemographic groups in 58,724 adults.ResultsCompletion of specific identification measures varied markedly. Each measure identified different proportions of defined substance-use groups. The measures with specific substance prompts, a screening tool and clinical pathway, identified higher prevalence of harmful use than the measures of diagnosis and an outcome measure, which lack specific prompts.ConclusionsIndividual SUDs identification processes, including diagnosis, were variably completed, with low screening tool completion. They identified markedly different prevalence, higher for more structured tools. Structured specific screening tools may over-identify risk of SUDs. Care of SUDs in adult MHSs could be improved at individual clinician and service levels by clarifying care pathways to better support delivery of structured processes of screening and brief intervention and to enable targeted assessment and accurate diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.