Identifying substance-use disorders in mental health services: Routine practice across an Australian state.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
John Reilly, Michael Lam, Grant Sara, Ed Heffernan
{"title":"Identifying substance-use disorders in mental health services: Routine practice across an Australian state.","authors":"John Reilly, Michael Lam, Grant Sara, Ed Heffernan","doi":"10.1177/10398562261493840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSubstance-use disorders (SUDs) are commonly seen in mental health services (MHSs) but inaccurate identification contributes to their inconsistent care. This study examines routine SUDs identification in Queensland's adult MHSs.MethodsRoutine completion of four SUDs identification methods in the statewide electronic health record for MHSs was measured over 4 years from November 2018. Prevalence of identified substance-use groups, defined for each measure, was measured and compared across sociodemographic groups in 58,724 adults.ResultsCompletion of specific identification measures varied markedly. Each measure identified different proportions of defined substance-use groups. The measures with specific substance prompts, a screening tool and clinical pathway, identified higher prevalence of harmful use than the measures of diagnosis and an outcome measure, which lack specific prompts.ConclusionsIndividual SUDs identification processes, including diagnosis, were variably completed, with low screening tool completion. They identified markedly different prevalence, higher for more structured tools. Structured specific screening tools may over-identify risk of SUDs. Care of SUDs in adult MHSs could be improved at individual clinician and service levels by clarifying care pathways to better support delivery of structured processes of screening and brief intervention and to enable targeted assessment and accurate diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562261493840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562261493840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSubstance-use disorders (SUDs) are commonly seen in mental health services (MHSs) but inaccurate identification contributes to their inconsistent care. This study examines routine SUDs identification in Queensland's adult MHSs.MethodsRoutine completion of four SUDs identification methods in the statewide electronic health record for MHSs was measured over 4 years from November 2018. Prevalence of identified substance-use groups, defined for each measure, was measured and compared across sociodemographic groups in 58,724 adults.ResultsCompletion of specific identification measures varied markedly. Each measure identified different proportions of defined substance-use groups. The measures with specific substance prompts, a screening tool and clinical pathway, identified higher prevalence of harmful use than the measures of diagnosis and an outcome measure, which lack specific prompts.ConclusionsIndividual SUDs identification processes, including diagnosis, were variably completed, with low screening tool completion. They identified markedly different prevalence, higher for more structured tools. Structured specific screening tools may over-identify risk of SUDs. Care of SUDs in adult MHSs could be improved at individual clinician and service levels by clarifying care pathways to better support delivery of structured processes of screening and brief intervention and to enable targeted assessment and accurate diagnosis.

识别精神卫生服务中的物质使用障碍:澳大利亚州的常规实践。
物质使用障碍(sud)常见于精神卫生服务(mhs),但不准确的识别导致他们的护理不一致。本研究检查了昆士兰成年mhs的常规sud识别。方法自2018年11月起,对mhs电子健康记录中4种sud识别方法的常规完成情况进行测量。在58,724名成年人中,对每种测量方法定义的已确定物质使用群体的患病率进行了测量和比较。结果具体鉴定措施的完成情况差异显著。每项措施都确定了已定义物质使用群体的不同比例。与缺乏具体提示的诊断措施和结果措施相比,具有特定物质提示、筛查工具和临床途径的措施确定了更高的有害使用发生率。结论个体sud的识别过程,包括诊断,完成程度不一,筛查工具的完成程度较低。他们发现了明显不同的患病率,更结构化的工具的患病率更高。结构化的特定筛查工具可能会过度识别sud的风险。通过明确护理途径,以更好地支持结构化筛查和简短干预过程的提供,并使有针对性的评估和准确诊断成为可能,可以在个体临床医生和服务水平上改善成人mhs中sud的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书