Comparative evaluation of viability assays and functional analysis of bbi29 in Borrelia burgdorferi.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Pub Date : 2026-10-21 Epub Date: 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1128/aem.01574-26
Connor Waldron, Sierra George, Zhiming Ouyang
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of viability assays and functional analysis of <i>bbi29</i> in <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>.","authors":"Connor Waldron, Sierra George, Zhiming Ouyang","doi":"10.1128/aem.01574-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>In vitro</i> viability assays are essential for studying the survival of <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> after exposure to stressful conditions. In contrast to the cumbersome and tedious manual microscopic counting method, fluorescence-based assays are more rapid and convenient and thus can be used in a high-throughput format. In the SYBR Green I/propidium iodide (PI) assay, spirochetes are labeled with different fluorescent dyes, and fluorescence ratios are then compared to calculate the ratio between live and dead spirochetes. Stained spirochetes are also manually counted under a fluorescence microscope or analyzed via flow cytometry to obtain the live/dead ratio. In this study, we compared these methods to determine the most accurate technique for quantifying spirochete viability. Our results showed that, compared with the SYBR Green I/PI assay that carries inherent caveats, both the fluorescent microscopic counting method and the flow cytometry method provide more reliable and accurate results for <i>B. burgdorferi</i> viability assays, and flow cytometry offers significant advantages in speed and reduced labor compared to manual microscopic counting. Leveraging the flow cytometry-based viability assay, we investigated the role of gene <i>bbi29</i>, encoding a putative virulence-associated lipoprotein, in <i>B. burgdorferi</i> stress response. The contribution of <i>bbi29</i> to <i>B. burgdorferi</i> mammalian infection was also examined using a murine model of Lyme disease.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Lyme disease, caused by <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>, is the most common tick-borne disease in the United States. Assessment of <i>B. burgdorferi</i> growth and viability has been traditionally challenging due to the slow growth and unique morphology of the spirochete. Recently, an optimized SYBR Green I/PI assay was developed and has since been used by a number of laboratories to assess <i>B. burgdorferi</i> viability. We herein surprisingly found that the SYBR Green I/PI assay has significant caveats and does not provide accurate quantification of <i>B. burgdorferi</i> viability. Rather, our data showed that flow cytometry is a superior alternative to quantify spirochete viability, providing a valuable methodological framework for future studies. Additionally, by investigating the role and requirement for gene <i>bbi29</i>, we have refined our understanding of hypothetical proteins in <i>B. burgdorferi</i> pathogenesis. Together, this work highlights the importance of developing and validating experimental approaches and functionally characterizing <i>B. burgdorferi</i> genes with unknown functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8002,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0157426"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13689468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01574-26","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro viability assays are essential for studying the survival of Borrelia burgdorferi after exposure to stressful conditions. In contrast to the cumbersome and tedious manual microscopic counting method, fluorescence-based assays are more rapid and convenient and thus can be used in a high-throughput format. In the SYBR Green I/propidium iodide (PI) assay, spirochetes are labeled with different fluorescent dyes, and fluorescence ratios are then compared to calculate the ratio between live and dead spirochetes. Stained spirochetes are also manually counted under a fluorescence microscope or analyzed via flow cytometry to obtain the live/dead ratio. In this study, we compared these methods to determine the most accurate technique for quantifying spirochete viability. Our results showed that, compared with the SYBR Green I/PI assay that carries inherent caveats, both the fluorescent microscopic counting method and the flow cytometry method provide more reliable and accurate results for B. burgdorferi viability assays, and flow cytometry offers significant advantages in speed and reduced labor compared to manual microscopic counting. Leveraging the flow cytometry-based viability assay, we investigated the role of gene bbi29, encoding a putative virulence-associated lipoprotein, in B. burgdorferi stress response. The contribution of bbi29 to B. burgdorferi mammalian infection was also examined using a murine model of Lyme disease.

Importance: Lyme disease, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common tick-borne disease in the United States. Assessment of B. burgdorferi growth and viability has been traditionally challenging due to the slow growth and unique morphology of the spirochete. Recently, an optimized SYBR Green I/PI assay was developed and has since been used by a number of laboratories to assess B. burgdorferi viability. We herein surprisingly found that the SYBR Green I/PI assay has significant caveats and does not provide accurate quantification of B. burgdorferi viability. Rather, our data showed that flow cytometry is a superior alternative to quantify spirochete viability, providing a valuable methodological framework for future studies. Additionally, by investigating the role and requirement for gene bbi29, we have refined our understanding of hypothetical proteins in B. burgdorferi pathogenesis. Together, this work highlights the importance of developing and validating experimental approaches and functionally characterizing B. burgdorferi genes with unknown functions.

bbi29在伯氏疏螺旋体中活力测定及功能分析的比较评价。
体外生存能力测定对于研究伯氏疏螺旋体在暴露于应激条件后的存活至关重要。与繁琐和繁琐的人工显微计数方法相比,基于荧光的分析更快速和方便,因此可以在高通量格式中使用。在SYBR Green I/碘化丙啶(PI)试验中,用不同的荧光染料标记螺旋体,然后比较荧光比率以计算活螺旋体和死螺旋体之间的比率。染色的螺旋体也在荧光显微镜下人工计数或通过流式细胞术分析以获得活/死比。在这项研究中,我们比较了这些方法,以确定最准确的量化螺旋体活力的技术。我们的研究结果表明,与带有固有警告的SYBR Green I/PI法相比,荧光显微镜计数法和流式细胞术方法都能提供更可靠和准确的伯氏疏螺旋体活力测定结果,并且与人工显微镜计数相比,流式细胞术在速度和减少人工方面具有显著优势。利用基于流式细胞术的活力测定,我们研究了基因bbi29在伯氏疏螺旋体应激反应中的作用,该基因编码一种假定的毒力相关脂蛋白。bbi29对哺乳动物感染伯氏疏螺旋体的贡献也通过莱姆病小鼠模型进行了研究。重要性:由伯氏疏螺旋体引起的莱姆病是美国最常见的蜱传疾病。由于螺旋体的生长缓慢和独特的形态,评估伯氏疏螺旋体的生长和生存能力传统上具有挑战性。最近,开发了一种优化的SYBR Green I/PI检测方法,并已被许多实验室用于评估伯氏疏螺旋体的生存能力。我们在此意外地发现,SYBR Green I/PI检测有明显的缺陷,不能准确定量伯氏疏螺旋体的活力。相反,我们的数据显示,流式细胞术是量化螺旋体活力的一种更好的选择,为未来的研究提供了有价值的方法框架。此外,通过研究bbi29基因的作用和需求,我们已经完善了对伯氏疏螺旋体发病机制中假设蛋白的理解。总之,这项工作强调了开发和验证实验方法以及功能未知的伯氏疏螺旋体基因功能表征的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
730
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied and Environmental Microbiology (AEM) publishes papers that make significant contributions to (a) applied microbiology, including biotechnology, protein engineering, bioremediation, and food microbiology, (b) microbial ecology, including environmental, organismic, and genomic microbiology, and (c) interdisciplinary microbiology, including invertebrate microbiology, plant microbiology, aquatic microbiology, and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书