Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Laura Burns Amin, M Kelsey Kirkwood, Laura A Levit, Erin P Balogh, David Michael Waterhouse, Joseph M Unger, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
{"title":"Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?","authors":"Laura Burns Amin, M Kelsey Kirkwood, Laura A Levit, Erin P Balogh, David Michael Waterhouse, Joseph M Unger, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor","doi":"10.1007/s10549-026-08084-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geographic proximity to clinical trials is a major barrier to trial participation, but geographic access to trials has not been specifically characterized for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We evaluated the geographic distribution of TNBC treatment trials across U.S. counties and examined associated social and demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as of September 30, 2024 (n = 510,397) were queried, and active phase II and III TNBC treatment trials were identified through keyword searches. County-level population estimates from the 2018-2022 U.S. Census Bureau 5-year estimates and county adjacency data were used to evaluate trial availability and geographic access. Trial availability was examined according to sponsorship, rurality, health vulnerability, race and ethnicity, and U.S. region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 108 active TNBC trials, including 58 (54%) for metastatic and 50 (46%) for non-metastatic disease. Overall, 76% of U.S. counties had no TNBC trials, 12% had exclusively federally sponsored trials, 10% had both federally and non-federally sponsored trials, and 2% had only non-federally sponsored trials. Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials. Counties with predominantly Black, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaska Native populations were less likely to have TNBC trials than predominantly non-Hispanic White counties. Women in the South were more likely than women in the Northeast to have no TNBC trial available in either their county of residence or a neighboring county.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TNBC clinical trials are geographically concentrated across the United States, with substantial disparities in access affecting rural and highly vulnerable counties, counties with predominantly racial and ethnic minority populations, and women living in the South. Federally sponsored trials may play an important role in supporting trial availability in underserved areas. Expanding the geographic distribution of TNBC trials may help improve equitable access to clinical trial participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":"219 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-08084-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geographic proximity to clinical trials is a major barrier to trial participation, but geographic access to trials has not been specifically characterized for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We evaluated the geographic distribution of TNBC treatment trials across U.S. counties and examined associated social and demographic characteristics.

Methods: All trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as of September 30, 2024 (n = 510,397) were queried, and active phase II and III TNBC treatment trials were identified through keyword searches. County-level population estimates from the 2018-2022 U.S. Census Bureau 5-year estimates and county adjacency data were used to evaluate trial availability and geographic access. Trial availability was examined according to sponsorship, rurality, health vulnerability, race and ethnicity, and U.S. region.

Results: We identified 108 active TNBC trials, including 58 (54%) for metastatic and 50 (46%) for non-metastatic disease. Overall, 76% of U.S. counties had no TNBC trials, 12% had exclusively federally sponsored trials, 10% had both federally and non-federally sponsored trials, and 2% had only non-federally sponsored trials. Trial availability was significantly lower in counties with the highest health vulnerability and in rural counties, which were more likely to rely exclusively on federally sponsored trials. Counties with predominantly Black, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaska Native populations were less likely to have TNBC trials than predominantly non-Hispanic White counties. Women in the South were more likely than women in the Northeast to have no TNBC trial available in either their county of residence or a neighboring county.

Conclusions: TNBC clinical trials are geographically concentrated across the United States, with substantial disparities in access affecting rural and highly vulnerable counties, counties with predominantly racial and ethnic minority populations, and women living in the South. Federally sponsored trials may play an important role in supporting trial availability in underserved areas. Expanding the geographic distribution of TNBC trials may help improve equitable access to clinical trial participation.

三阴性乳腺癌临床试验的地理可及性:试验是否位于患者附近?
背景:临床试验的地理邻近性是参与试验的主要障碍,但三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的地理可及性尚未明确。我们评估了美国各郡TNBC治疗试验的地理分布,并检查了相关的社会和人口特征。方法:查询截至2024年9月30日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的所有试验(n = 510,397),并通过关键词搜索确定活跃的II期和III期TNBC治疗试验。使用2018-2022年美国人口普查局5年估计数和县邻接数据的县级人口估计数来评估试验的可用性和地理可及性。试验的可获得性根据赞助、农村、健康脆弱性、种族和民族以及美国地区进行了检查。结果:我们确定了108项活跃的TNBC试验,其中58项(54%)用于转移性疾病,50项(46%)用于非转移性疾病。总的来说,76%的美国县没有TNBC试验,12%的县完全是联邦资助的试验,10%的县既有联邦资助的试验,也有非联邦资助的试验,2%的县只有非联邦资助的试验。在健康脆弱性最高的县和农村县,试验的可获得性明显较低,农村县更有可能完全依赖联邦资助的试验。以黑人、西班牙裔、美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民为主的县进行TNBC试验的可能性低于以非西班牙裔白人为主的县。南方的妇女比东北部的妇女更有可能在她们居住的县或邻近的县没有TNBC试验。结论:TNBC临床试验在地理上集中在美国各地,在影响农村和高度脆弱县,主要是种族和少数民族人口的县以及生活在南方的妇女方面存在巨大差异。联邦资助的试验可能在支持服务不足地区的试验可用性方面发挥重要作用。扩大TNBC试验的地理分布可能有助于提高公平参与临床试验的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书