Individualized Or Conventional Transfusion Strategy During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support (ICONE Study): Rationale and Design of a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa, Osama Abou Arab, Julien Labreuche, Emmanuel Besnier, Pierre-Gregoire Guinot, Fanette Denis, Benoit Dervaux, Yazine Mahjoub, Thibault Duburcq, Saad Nseir, Alain Duhamel, Francis Juthier, Emmanuel Robin, André Vincentelli
{"title":"Individualized Or Conventional Transfusion Strategy During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support (ICONE Study): Rationale and Design of a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa, Osama Abou Arab, Julien Labreuche, Emmanuel Besnier, Pierre-Gregoire Guinot, Fanette Denis, Benoit Dervaux, Yazine Mahjoub, Thibault Duburcq, Saad Nseir, Alain Duhamel, Francis Juthier, Emmanuel Robin, André Vincentelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) are heterogeneous, and the benefit - harm balance remains uncertain. Current recommendations rely on predefined hemoglobin thresholds and do not provide criteria for individualized transfusion. As the primary goal of RBC transfusion is to optimize oxygen delivery (DO₂) to meet oxygen consumption (VO₂), a strategy guided by a surrogate of DO₂/VO₂ mismatch - central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂)- may be more appropriate than fixed liberal transfusion thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ICONE is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing two transfusion strategies in adult patients supported by VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock. Patients are randomized 1:1 and stratified according to postcardiotomy versus medical etiology to either individualized or conventional transfusion strategy. In the individualized group, transfusion is triggered by ScvO<sub>2</sub> <65% despite optimization of VO₂ determinants. In the conventional group, transfusion was triggered by hemoglobin <9 g/dL. The primary endpoint is the number of RBCs units transfused per day of ECMO support. Secondary outcomes include 28-day composite of major adverse outcomes (key secondary endpoint), 90-days all-cause mortality, rate of organ failure, transfusion-related immune and non-immune complications (including human leucocyte antigen allosensitization) and cost effectiveness. A total of 236 patients provides 80% power to detect a 25% reduction in the primary endpoint and in key secondary outcomes using a two-sided test at 0.05 significance level (considering hierarchical testing framework) and considering 5% drop out. The study was registered in April 2020 (NCT05699005; IDRCB 2021-A01925-36) and is currently recruiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ICONE trial may contribute to changing transfusion practice in VA-ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) are heterogeneous, and the benefit - harm balance remains uncertain. Current recommendations rely on predefined hemoglobin thresholds and do not provide criteria for individualized transfusion. As the primary goal of RBC transfusion is to optimize oxygen delivery (DO₂) to meet oxygen consumption (VO₂), a strategy guided by a surrogate of DO₂/VO₂ mismatch - central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂)- may be more appropriate than fixed liberal transfusion thresholds.

Methods: ICONE is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing two transfusion strategies in adult patients supported by VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock. Patients are randomized 1:1 and stratified according to postcardiotomy versus medical etiology to either individualized or conventional transfusion strategy. In the individualized group, transfusion is triggered by ScvO2 <65% despite optimization of VO₂ determinants. In the conventional group, transfusion was triggered by hemoglobin <9 g/dL. The primary endpoint is the number of RBCs units transfused per day of ECMO support. Secondary outcomes include 28-day composite of major adverse outcomes (key secondary endpoint), 90-days all-cause mortality, rate of organ failure, transfusion-related immune and non-immune complications (including human leucocyte antigen allosensitization) and cost effectiveness. A total of 236 patients provides 80% power to detect a 25% reduction in the primary endpoint and in key secondary outcomes using a two-sided test at 0.05 significance level (considering hierarchical testing framework) and considering 5% drop out. The study was registered in April 2020 (NCT05699005; IDRCB 2021-A01925-36) and is currently recruiting.

Conclusion: The ICONE trial may contribute to changing transfusion practice in VA-ECMO.

静脉-动脉体外膜氧合支持期间的个体化或常规输血策略(ICONE研究):一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验的基本原理和设计。
背景:在静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)过程中,红细胞(RBC)输血的做法是不同的,其利弊平衡仍然不确定。目前的建议依赖于预定义的血红蛋白阈值,并没有提供个性化输血的标准。由于RBC输血的主要目标是优化氧输送(DO 2)以满足氧消耗(VO 2),因此以DO 2 /VO 2错配的替代指标-中心静脉氧饱和度(ScvO 2)为指导的策略可能比固定的自由输血阈值更合适。方法:ICONE是一项多中心、随机、对照试验,比较VA-ECMO支持下治疗难治性心源性休克的成人患者的两种输血策略。患者按1:1随机分组,并根据心脏切开术后与内科病因进行分层,选择个体化或常规输血策略。结论:ICONE试验可能有助于改变VA-ECMO的输血实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书