Exploratory Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Patterns in First-Degree Relatives with Dysglycemia at Risk of Progression to Stage 3 Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Olivier Pollé, Tadej Battelino, Pieter-Jan Martens, Lut Overbergh, Chantal Mathieu, M Loredana Marcovecchio
{"title":"Exploratory Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Patterns in First-Degree Relatives with Dysglycemia at Risk of Progression to Stage 3 Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Olivier Pollé, Tadej Battelino, Pieter-Jan Martens, Lut Overbergh, Chantal Mathieu, M Loredana Marcovecchio","doi":"10.1177/15209156261492040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can characterize subtle glucose changes in early-stage type 1 diabetes (T1D). We assessed whether CGM metrics predict Stage 3 T1D in first-degree relatives (FDRs) with positive islet autoantibodies (IAbs) and dysglycemia participating in INNODIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed IAb-positive FDRs with dysglycemia and available CGM data. CGM metrics were analyzed longitudinally and in a restricted analysis limited to the last assessment before Stage 3 T1D in progressors. CGM metrics were compared using linear mixed models. Predictive performance of single and combined CGM metric models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 27 participants (14 females [52%], median [interquartile range] age: 16.8 [11.9-39.8] years) were analyzed. Nine participants progressed to Stage 3 T1D after a median of 163 [129-244] days from CGM assessment. In the restricted analysis, progressors had higher mean glucose (132 vs. 111 mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.001), time >140 mg/dL (36% vs. 10%, <i>P</i> = 0.003), and time >180 mg/dL between 9 PM and 2 AM (8.1% vs. 1.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.005), whereas time <70 mg/dL between 4 and 7 AM was lower (0% vs. 1.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Time >140 mg/dL yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.00). Combining time >140 mg/dL with time-specific percentages >180 and <70 mg/dL increased AUC to 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00). A model incorporating time between 70 and 140 mg/dL, mean glucose, early morning <70 mg/dL, and MAGE achieved 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGM may help identify FDRs with IAbs and dysglycemia at higher risk of progressing to Stage 3 T1D. Combining CGM metrics improved prediction compared with time >140 mg/dL alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"15209156261492040"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156261492040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can characterize subtle glucose changes in early-stage type 1 diabetes (T1D). We assessed whether CGM metrics predict Stage 3 T1D in first-degree relatives (FDRs) with positive islet autoantibodies (IAbs) and dysglycemia participating in INNODIA.

Methods: We analyzed IAb-positive FDRs with dysglycemia and available CGM data. CGM metrics were analyzed longitudinally and in a restricted analysis limited to the last assessment before Stage 3 T1D in progressors. CGM metrics were compared using linear mixed models. Predictive performance of single and combined CGM metric models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

Results: Data from 27 participants (14 females [52%], median [interquartile range] age: 16.8 [11.9-39.8] years) were analyzed. Nine participants progressed to Stage 3 T1D after a median of 163 [129-244] days from CGM assessment. In the restricted analysis, progressors had higher mean glucose (132 vs. 111 mg/dL, P = 0.001), time >140 mg/dL (36% vs. 10%, P = 0.003), and time >180 mg/dL between 9 PM and 2 AM (8.1% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.005), whereas time <70 mg/dL between 4 and 7 AM was lower (0% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.001). Time >140 mg/dL yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.00). Combining time >140 mg/dL with time-specific percentages >180 and <70 mg/dL increased AUC to 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.00). A model incorporating time between 70 and 140 mg/dL, mean glucose, early morning <70 mg/dL, and MAGE achieved 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity.

Conclusions: CGM may help identify FDRs with IAbs and dysglycemia at higher risk of progressing to Stage 3 T1D. Combining CGM metrics improved prediction compared with time >140 mg/dL alone.

有进展为3期1型糖尿病风险的血糖异常一级亲属连续血糖监测模式的探索性分析
连续血糖监测(CGM)可以表征早期1型糖尿病(T1D)的细微血糖变化。我们评估了CGM指标是否能预测参与INNODIA的胰岛自身抗体(IAbs)阳性和血糖异常的一级亲属(fdr)的3期T1D。方法:我们分析了伴有血糖异常的抗体阳性fdr和现有的CGM数据。纵向分析CGM指标,并在限制性分析中仅限于进展者第三阶段T1D前的最后一次评估。采用线性混合模型比较CGM指标。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估单一和组合CGM度量模型的预测性能。结果:分析了27名参与者的数据,其中14名女性(52%),年龄中位数(四分位数间距):16.8[11.9-39.8]岁。9名参与者在CGM评估后的中位时间为163[129-244]天,进展为T1D期。在限制性分析中,进展者的平均血糖(132 vs 111 mg/dL, P = 0.001), >时间为140 mg/dL (36% vs. 10%, P = 0.003), >时间为180 mg/dL (8.1% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.005),而时间P = 0.001)。当浓度为bb0 ~ 140 mg/dL时,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.83(95%可信区间[CI] 0.66 ~ 1.00)。结合时间b>40 mg/dL和时间特异性百分比b>80和结论:CGM可能有助于识别有抗体和血糖异常的fdr进展为3期T1D的风险较高。与单独使用140 mg/dL时相比,联合使用CGM指标可提高预测效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书