Expanding the chemical space of Bcl-2 inhibitors: a multiscale computational exploration of the benzopyran (chromene) scaffold

IF 2.9 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Kritika Sharma, N. D. Yash, Mansi Dangi, Maitree Kadamb, Aparna shrivastava, J. Senthil Kumaran, Sakshi Yadav, Monika Jain, Amit Kumar Singh, Jayaraman Muthukumaran
{"title":"Expanding the chemical space of Bcl-2 inhibitors: a multiscale computational exploration of the benzopyran (chromene) scaffold","authors":"Kritika Sharma,&nbsp;N. D. Yash,&nbsp;Mansi Dangi,&nbsp;Maitree Kadamb,&nbsp;Aparna shrivastava,&nbsp;J. Senthil Kumaran,&nbsp;Sakshi Yadav,&nbsp;Monika Jain,&nbsp;Amit Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Jayaraman Muthukumaran","doi":"10.1007/s00894-026-06960-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Dysregulation of apoptosis mediated by antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins contributes significantly to cancer progression and treatment resistance. Although the BH3 mimetic venetoclax has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy, the emergence of resistance-associated mechanisms has created a need for alternative Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds. Benzopyran derivatives, including 4<i>H</i>-chromene and chromone derivatives, represent a structurally diverse class of compounds with reported anticancer and apoptosis-modulating activities; however, their interaction landscape with Bcl-2 remains insufficiently explored. In the present study, a curated library of 356 benzopyran family compounds was investigated against Bcl-2 to identify potential lead candidates. Three compounds, PM28524659, PM31145889, and PM34262894, exhibited favorable binding characteristics relative to the reference chromene-derived Bcl-2 inhibitor HA14-1. Binding mode analysis indicated occupancy of the BH3-binding groove, with interactions involving ASP49, ARG53, and TYR148 residues. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses revealed preservation of key target recognition features despite low overall structural similarity to HA14-1. Based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and molecular descriptor profiles, PM28524659 and PM31145889 were selected for further investigation through long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations. Both complexes remained stable throughout the 500-ns MD simulation period and maintained favorable interactions with the binding pocket while preserving the overall structural integrity of Bcl-2 protein. Although the identified compounds exhibited lower predicted binding affinity than venetoclax, their favorable ligand efficiency, relatively simple molecular architecture, and scope for structural optimization support their further evaluation as Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds for apoptosis-directed anticancer drug discovery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A dataset comprising 356 curated benzopyran family compounds was subjected to virtual screening against Bcl-2 (PDB ID: 6O0K) using AutoDock Vina. Protein–ligand interactions were analyzed using Discovery Studio Visualizer and PyMOL. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses were performed using two-dimensional and three-dimensional descriptor-based approaches. Drug-likeness, physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic parameters, and toxicity profiles were assessed using SwissADME, ProTox-3, and related cheminformatics tools. The selected protein–ligand complexes were further investigated by 500-ns molecular dynamics simulations using GROMACS 2025.3 and the CHARMM36 force field in an explicit solvent environment employing the CHARMM-modified TIP3P water model. Trajectory analyses included root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (<i>R</i><sub>g</sub>), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), intermolecular hydrogen bond analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and MM/PBSA-based binding free energy analysis to characterize structural stability, residue-level flexibility, compactness, protein–ligand interactions, dominant collective essential motions, and binding affinity. The trajectory-derived parameters were further subjected to descriptive statistical and distributional analyses using Python-based tools, including Pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, and Seaborn, with correlation and cross-correlation analyses used to examine parameter relationships and variability across the simulated systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-026-06960-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Dysregulation of apoptosis mediated by antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins contributes significantly to cancer progression and treatment resistance. Although the BH3 mimetic venetoclax has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy, the emergence of resistance-associated mechanisms has created a need for alternative Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds. Benzopyran derivatives, including 4H-chromene and chromone derivatives, represent a structurally diverse class of compounds with reported anticancer and apoptosis-modulating activities; however, their interaction landscape with Bcl-2 remains insufficiently explored. In the present study, a curated library of 356 benzopyran family compounds was investigated against Bcl-2 to identify potential lead candidates. Three compounds, PM28524659, PM31145889, and PM34262894, exhibited favorable binding characteristics relative to the reference chromene-derived Bcl-2 inhibitor HA14-1. Binding mode analysis indicated occupancy of the BH3-binding groove, with interactions involving ASP49, ARG53, and TYR148 residues. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses revealed preservation of key target recognition features despite low overall structural similarity to HA14-1. Based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and molecular descriptor profiles, PM28524659 and PM31145889 were selected for further investigation through long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations. Both complexes remained stable throughout the 500-ns MD simulation period and maintained favorable interactions with the binding pocket while preserving the overall structural integrity of Bcl-2 protein. Although the identified compounds exhibited lower predicted binding affinity than venetoclax, their favorable ligand efficiency, relatively simple molecular architecture, and scope for structural optimization support their further evaluation as Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds for apoptosis-directed anticancer drug discovery.

Methods

A dataset comprising 356 curated benzopyran family compounds was subjected to virtual screening against Bcl-2 (PDB ID: 6O0K) using AutoDock Vina. Protein–ligand interactions were analyzed using Discovery Studio Visualizer and PyMOL. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses were performed using two-dimensional and three-dimensional descriptor-based approaches. Drug-likeness, physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic parameters, and toxicity profiles were assessed using SwissADME, ProTox-3, and related cheminformatics tools. The selected protein–ligand complexes were further investigated by 500-ns molecular dynamics simulations using GROMACS 2025.3 and the CHARMM36 force field in an explicit solvent environment employing the CHARMM-modified TIP3P water model. Trajectory analyses included root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), intermolecular hydrogen bond analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and MM/PBSA-based binding free energy analysis to characterize structural stability, residue-level flexibility, compactness, protein–ligand interactions, dominant collective essential motions, and binding affinity. The trajectory-derived parameters were further subjected to descriptive statistical and distributional analyses using Python-based tools, including Pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, and Seaborn, with correlation and cross-correlation analyses used to examine parameter relationships and variability across the simulated systems.

扩展Bcl-2抑制剂的化学空间:苯并吡喃(铬)支架的多尺度计算探索。
背景:抗凋亡Bcl-2家族蛋白介导的细胞凋亡失调在癌症进展和治疗耐药中起着重要作用。尽管BH3模拟venetoclax已显示出显著的临床疗效,但耐药相关机制的出现已经产生了对替代bcl -2靶向支架的需求。苯并吡喃衍生物,包括4h -铬烯和色素衍生物,是一类结构多样的化合物,具有抗癌和细胞凋亡调节活性;然而,它们与Bcl-2的相互作用景观仍未得到充分探索。在本研究中,我们对356个苯并吡喃家族化合物与Bcl-2进行了研究,以确定潜在的候选先导化合物。3个化合物PM28524659, PM31145889和PM34262894相对于参考铬衍生的Bcl-2抑制剂HA14-1表现出良好的结合特性。结合模式分析表明bh3结合槽占据,相互作用涉及ASP49、ARG53和TYR148残基。分子相似性、支架和药效团分析显示,尽管与HA14-1的整体结构相似性较低,但仍保留了关键的目标识别特征。基于PM28524659和PM31145889的理化、药代动力学和分子描述符特征,我们选择它们进行长时间的分子动力学模拟研究。这两种复合物在整个500-ns MD模拟期间都保持稳定,并在保持Bcl-2蛋白整体结构完整性的同时与结合袋保持良好的相互作用。虽然所鉴定的化合物表现出比venetoclax更低的预测结合亲和力,但它们良好的配体效率、相对简单的分子结构和结构优化的范围支持它们作为bcl -2靶向支架的进一步评估,用于细胞凋亡导向的抗癌药物发现。方法:使用AutoDock Vina对356个经筛选的苯并吡喃家族化合物进行抗Bcl-2 (PDB ID: 600k)的虚拟筛选。使用Discovery Studio Visualizer和PyMOL分析蛋白质与配体的相互作用。分子相似性、支架和药效团分析使用基于二维和三维描述符的方法进行。使用SwissADME、ProTox-3和相关化学信息学工具评估药物相似性、理化性质、药代动力学参数和毒性谱。采用GROMACS 2025.3和CHARMM36力场,在显式溶剂环境下,采用charmm修饰的TIP3P水模型,通过500-ns分子动力学模拟进一步研究了所选择的蛋白质-配体复合物。轨迹分析包括均方根偏差(RMSD)、均方根波动(RMSF)、旋转半径(Rg)、溶剂可及表面积(SASA)、分子间氢键分析、主成分分析(PCA)和基于MM/ pbsa的结合自由能分析,以表征结构稳定性、残基级柔韧性、紧密性、蛋白质-配体相互作用、主导集体基本运动和结合亲和力。使用基于python的工具(包括Pandas、NumPy、Matplotlib和Seaborn)进一步对轨迹衍生参数进行描述性统计和分布分析,并使用相关和互相关分析来检查模拟系统中的参数关系和变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Modeling
Journal of Molecular Modeling 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
362
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling. Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry. Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书