Kritika Sharma, N. D. Yash, Mansi Dangi, Maitree Kadamb, Aparna shrivastava, J. Senthil Kumaran, Sakshi Yadav, Monika Jain, Amit Kumar Singh, Jayaraman Muthukumaran
{"title":"Expanding the chemical space of Bcl-2 inhibitors: a multiscale computational exploration of the benzopyran (chromene) scaffold","authors":"Kritika Sharma, N. D. Yash, Mansi Dangi, Maitree Kadamb, Aparna shrivastava, J. Senthil Kumaran, Sakshi Yadav, Monika Jain, Amit Kumar Singh, Jayaraman Muthukumaran","doi":"10.1007/s00894-026-06960-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Dysregulation of apoptosis mediated by antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins contributes significantly to cancer progression and treatment resistance. Although the BH3 mimetic venetoclax has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy, the emergence of resistance-associated mechanisms has created a need for alternative Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds. Benzopyran derivatives, including 4<i>H</i>-chromene and chromone derivatives, represent a structurally diverse class of compounds with reported anticancer and apoptosis-modulating activities; however, their interaction landscape with Bcl-2 remains insufficiently explored. In the present study, a curated library of 356 benzopyran family compounds was investigated against Bcl-2 to identify potential lead candidates. Three compounds, PM28524659, PM31145889, and PM34262894, exhibited favorable binding characteristics relative to the reference chromene-derived Bcl-2 inhibitor HA14-1. Binding mode analysis indicated occupancy of the BH3-binding groove, with interactions involving ASP49, ARG53, and TYR148 residues. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses revealed preservation of key target recognition features despite low overall structural similarity to HA14-1. Based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and molecular descriptor profiles, PM28524659 and PM31145889 were selected for further investigation through long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations. Both complexes remained stable throughout the 500-ns MD simulation period and maintained favorable interactions with the binding pocket while preserving the overall structural integrity of Bcl-2 protein. Although the identified compounds exhibited lower predicted binding affinity than venetoclax, their favorable ligand efficiency, relatively simple molecular architecture, and scope for structural optimization support their further evaluation as Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds for apoptosis-directed anticancer drug discovery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A dataset comprising 356 curated benzopyran family compounds was subjected to virtual screening against Bcl-2 (PDB ID: 6O0K) using AutoDock Vina. Protein–ligand interactions were analyzed using Discovery Studio Visualizer and PyMOL. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses were performed using two-dimensional and three-dimensional descriptor-based approaches. Drug-likeness, physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic parameters, and toxicity profiles were assessed using SwissADME, ProTox-3, and related cheminformatics tools. The selected protein–ligand complexes were further investigated by 500-ns molecular dynamics simulations using GROMACS 2025.3 and the CHARMM36 force field in an explicit solvent environment employing the CHARMM-modified TIP3P water model. Trajectory analyses included root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (<i>R</i><sub>g</sub>), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), intermolecular hydrogen bond analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and MM/PBSA-based binding free energy analysis to characterize structural stability, residue-level flexibility, compactness, protein–ligand interactions, dominant collective essential motions, and binding affinity. The trajectory-derived parameters were further subjected to descriptive statistical and distributional analyses using Python-based tools, including Pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, and Seaborn, with correlation and cross-correlation analyses used to examine parameter relationships and variability across the simulated systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-026-06960-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
Dysregulation of apoptosis mediated by antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins contributes significantly to cancer progression and treatment resistance. Although the BH3 mimetic venetoclax has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy, the emergence of resistance-associated mechanisms has created a need for alternative Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds. Benzopyran derivatives, including 4H-chromene and chromone derivatives, represent a structurally diverse class of compounds with reported anticancer and apoptosis-modulating activities; however, their interaction landscape with Bcl-2 remains insufficiently explored. In the present study, a curated library of 356 benzopyran family compounds was investigated against Bcl-2 to identify potential lead candidates. Three compounds, PM28524659, PM31145889, and PM34262894, exhibited favorable binding characteristics relative to the reference chromene-derived Bcl-2 inhibitor HA14-1. Binding mode analysis indicated occupancy of the BH3-binding groove, with interactions involving ASP49, ARG53, and TYR148 residues. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses revealed preservation of key target recognition features despite low overall structural similarity to HA14-1. Based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and molecular descriptor profiles, PM28524659 and PM31145889 were selected for further investigation through long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations. Both complexes remained stable throughout the 500-ns MD simulation period and maintained favorable interactions with the binding pocket while preserving the overall structural integrity of Bcl-2 protein. Although the identified compounds exhibited lower predicted binding affinity than venetoclax, their favorable ligand efficiency, relatively simple molecular architecture, and scope for structural optimization support their further evaluation as Bcl-2-targeting scaffolds for apoptosis-directed anticancer drug discovery.
Methods
A dataset comprising 356 curated benzopyran family compounds was subjected to virtual screening against Bcl-2 (PDB ID: 6O0K) using AutoDock Vina. Protein–ligand interactions were analyzed using Discovery Studio Visualizer and PyMOL. Molecular similarity, scaffold, and pharmacophore analyses were performed using two-dimensional and three-dimensional descriptor-based approaches. Drug-likeness, physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic parameters, and toxicity profiles were assessed using SwissADME, ProTox-3, and related cheminformatics tools. The selected protein–ligand complexes were further investigated by 500-ns molecular dynamics simulations using GROMACS 2025.3 and the CHARMM36 force field in an explicit solvent environment employing the CHARMM-modified TIP3P water model. Trajectory analyses included root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), intermolecular hydrogen bond analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and MM/PBSA-based binding free energy analysis to characterize structural stability, residue-level flexibility, compactness, protein–ligand interactions, dominant collective essential motions, and binding affinity. The trajectory-derived parameters were further subjected to descriptive statistical and distributional analyses using Python-based tools, including Pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, and Seaborn, with correlation and cross-correlation analyses used to examine parameter relationships and variability across the simulated systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling.
Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry.
Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.