Prevalence of anxiety and depression and diagnostic utility of the CAT scale in spirometry-confirmed COPD patients: Findings from the Chinese Population Health and Multimorbidities Study

IF 7.9
Sinan Wu, Jian Kang, Xiangyan Zhang, Lan Yang, Fuqiang Wen, Yuanlin Song, Jianping Zhao, Jianying Xu, Wen Li, Pixin Ran, Kewu Huang, Yahong Chen, Yanfei Guo, Guangliang Shan, Ting Yang, Chen Wang, Jieping Lei, Chinese Population Health and Multimorbidities Study (CPHMS) Investigators
{"title":"Prevalence of anxiety and depression and diagnostic utility of the CAT scale in spirometry-confirmed COPD patients: Findings from the Chinese Population Health and Multimorbidities Study","authors":"Sinan Wu,&nbsp;Jian Kang,&nbsp;Xiangyan Zhang,&nbsp;Lan Yang,&nbsp;Fuqiang Wen,&nbsp;Yuanlin Song,&nbsp;Jianping Zhao,&nbsp;Jianying Xu,&nbsp;Wen Li,&nbsp;Pixin Ran,&nbsp;Kewu Huang,&nbsp;Yahong Chen,&nbsp;Yanfei Guo,&nbsp;Guangliang Shan,&nbsp;Ting Yang,&nbsp;Chen Wang,&nbsp;Jieping Lei,&nbsp;Chinese Population Health and Multimorbidities Study (CPHMS) Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.pccm.2026.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently present with psychological comorbidities, including anxiety and depression, which may contribute to poorer clinical outcomes. However, the prevalence and impact of these mental health conditions in COPD patients have long been underrecognized. Leveraging data from the Chinese Population Health and Multimorbidities Study (CPHMS), a large epidemiological survey on chronic respiratory diseases in China, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of anxiety and depression comorbidities among community-dwelling COPD patients and to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scale for detecting these conditions in spirometry-confirmed COPD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Analytical data were derived from the CPHMS. Comprehensive information on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and health status was collected. COPD-related pulmonary and extra-pulmonary symptoms were assessed using the CAT scale, and anxiety and depression were evaluated via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with anxiety or depression comorbidities, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the CAT scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3641 spirometry-confirmed community COPD patients, the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 11.07% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.05–12.09%) and 14.23% (95% CI: 13.09–15.36%), respectively. Female gender, rural residence, unemployment, lower annual family income, and higher total CAT score, as well as higher scores on both the pulmonary and extra-pulmonary symptom subscales of the CAT, were independently associated with an increased likelihood of anxiety and/or depression in COPD patients. The diagnostic yield of the CAT scale for identifying anxiety and depression in COPD patients was evaluated. In the overall COPD patients, the optimal total CAT cut-off value for detecting anxiety was 9 (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.637; 95% CI: 0.607–0.666), and for depression was 7 (AUC: 0.633; 95% CI: 0.607–0.659). Notably, among rural-dwelling COPD patients, the optimal cut-off was 7 for both anxiety (AUC: 0.624; 95% CI: 0.582–0.665) and depression (AUC: 0.616; 95% CI: 0.579–0.653), whereas in urban patients, the corresponding cut-offs were 11 for anxiety (AUC: 0.652; 95% CI: 0.610–0.694) and 10 for depression (AUC: 0.654; 95% CI: 0.618–0.691).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study delineated the prevalence of anxiety and depression among community COPD patients and validated the clinical utility of the CAT scale in detecting these psychological comorbidities. Our findings underscore the pressing need for tailored psychological support, particularly for COPD patients residing in rural area of China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72583,"journal":{"name":"Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 278-285"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772558826000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently present with psychological comorbidities, including anxiety and depression, which may contribute to poorer clinical outcomes. However, the prevalence and impact of these mental health conditions in COPD patients have long been underrecognized. Leveraging data from the Chinese Population Health and Multimorbidities Study (CPHMS), a large epidemiological survey on chronic respiratory diseases in China, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of anxiety and depression comorbidities among community-dwelling COPD patients and to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scale for detecting these conditions in spirometry-confirmed COPD patients.

Methods

Analytical data were derived from the CPHMS. Comprehensive information on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and health status was collected. COPD-related pulmonary and extra-pulmonary symptoms were assessed using the CAT scale, and anxiety and depression were evaluated via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with anxiety or depression comorbidities, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the CAT scale.

Results

Among 3641 spirometry-confirmed community COPD patients, the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 11.07% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.05–12.09%) and 14.23% (95% CI: 13.09–15.36%), respectively. Female gender, rural residence, unemployment, lower annual family income, and higher total CAT score, as well as higher scores on both the pulmonary and extra-pulmonary symptom subscales of the CAT, were independently associated with an increased likelihood of anxiety and/or depression in COPD patients. The diagnostic yield of the CAT scale for identifying anxiety and depression in COPD patients was evaluated. In the overall COPD patients, the optimal total CAT cut-off value for detecting anxiety was 9 (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.637; 95% CI: 0.607–0.666), and for depression was 7 (AUC: 0.633; 95% CI: 0.607–0.659). Notably, among rural-dwelling COPD patients, the optimal cut-off was 7 for both anxiety (AUC: 0.624; 95% CI: 0.582–0.665) and depression (AUC: 0.616; 95% CI: 0.579–0.653), whereas in urban patients, the corresponding cut-offs were 11 for anxiety (AUC: 0.652; 95% CI: 0.610–0.694) and 10 for depression (AUC: 0.654; 95% CI: 0.618–0.691).

Conclusions

This study delineated the prevalence of anxiety and depression among community COPD patients and validated the clinical utility of the CAT scale in detecting these psychological comorbidities. Our findings underscore the pressing need for tailored psychological support, particularly for COPD patients residing in rural area of China.
在肺活量测定确诊的慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,焦虑和抑郁的患病率及CAT量表的诊断效用:来自中国人口健康和多种疾病研究的发现
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者经常出现心理合并症,包括焦虑和抑郁,这可能导致较差的临床结果。然而,长期以来,COPD患者的患病率和这些心理健康状况的影响一直未得到充分认识。本研究利用中国人口健康和多病研究(CPHMS)的数据,这是一项关于中国慢性呼吸系统疾病的大型流行病学调查,旨在估计社区COPD患者中焦虑和抑郁合并症的患病率,并评估COPD评估测试(CAT)量表在肺活量测定确诊的COPD患者中检测这些疾病的诊断效用。方法分析数据来源于CPHMS。收集了有关社会人口特征、生活方式因素和健康状况的综合信息。使用CAT量表评估copd相关的肺部和肺外症状,并通过医院焦虑和抑郁量表评估焦虑和抑郁。采用多变量logistic回归识别焦虑或抑郁合并症的相关因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估CAT量表的诊断效能。结果3641例肺活量测定确诊的社区COPD患者中,焦虑和抑郁患病率分别为11.07%(95%可信区间[CI]: 10.05-12.09%)和14.23% (95% CI: 13.09-15.36%)。女性性别、农村居住、失业、较低的家庭年收入、较高的CAT总分,以及CAT的肺和肺外症状亚量表得分较高,与COPD患者焦虑和/或抑郁的可能性增加独立相关。评估CAT量表对COPD患者焦虑和抑郁的诊断率。在所有COPD患者中,检测焦虑的最佳总CAT截断值为9 (ROC曲线下面积[AUC]: 0.637; 95% CI: 0.607-0.666),检测抑郁的最佳总CAT截断值为7 (AUC: 0.633; 95% CI: 0.607-0.659)。值得注意的是,在农村居住的COPD患者中,焦虑(AUC: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.582-0.665)和抑郁(AUC: 0.616, 95% CI: 0.579-0.653)的最佳临界值均为7,而在城市患者中,焦虑(AUC: 0.652, 95% CI: 0.610-0.694)和抑郁(AUC: 0.654, 95% CI: 0.618-0.691)的最佳临界值分别为11和10。结论:本研究描述了社区COPD患者焦虑和抑郁的患病率,并验证了CAT量表在检测这些心理合并症方面的临床应用。我们的研究结果强调了定制心理支持的迫切需要,特别是对于居住在中国农村地区的COPD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine
Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书