Case-mix adjustment of HCAHPS scores based on national benchmarks in Japan: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2
Takuya Aoki, Masato Matsushima
{"title":"Case-mix adjustment of HCAHPS scores based on national benchmarks in Japan: a multicenter cross-sectional study.","authors":"Takuya Aoki, Masato Matsushima","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzag160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the increasing adoption of patient experience measurement in Asia, including Japan, limited progress has been made in identifying suitable patient-level adjusters and developing statistical methods for case-mix adjustment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a case-mix adjustment model for the Japanese version of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) using nationwide benchmark survey data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study using data from 83 hospitals across Japan that participated in the 2023 national patient experience survey. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to adult inpatients (aged ≥20 years) discharged between September and November 2023. The Japanese version of HCAHPS, comprising six composite measures and two global ratings, was used to calculate top-box scores (percentage of most positive responses). Candidate case-mix adjusters included age, gender, self-rated general health, self-rated mental health, and admission through the emergency department. The explanatory power (EP) of each adjuster was calculated as the product of predictive power and the between- versus within-hospital variance ratio. The impact of adjustment was evaluated by comparing unadjusted and adjusted scores and by assessing hospital rank changes using Kendall's τ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 13 602 patients were analyzed. Self-rated mental and general health showed the highest EP, whereas gender and emergency admission contributed minimally. The mean absolute adjustment of top-box scores ranged from 0.77 to 1.96 points. Case-mix adjustment changed hospital rankings in 3.4%-10.2% of all possible pairwise comparisons (Kendall's τ = 0.80-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides the first evidence-based case-mix adjustment model for HCAHPS scores in Japan. Applying such an adjustment is crucial to ensure fair benchmarking of PX across hospitals and to support data-driven quality improvement and accountability initiatives within Japan's evolving healthcare quality framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":520651,"journal":{"name":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing adoption of patient experience measurement in Asia, including Japan, limited progress has been made in identifying suitable patient-level adjusters and developing statistical methods for case-mix adjustment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a case-mix adjustment model for the Japanese version of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) using nationwide benchmark survey data.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study using data from 83 hospitals across Japan that participated in the 2023 national patient experience survey. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to adult inpatients (aged ≥20 years) discharged between September and November 2023. The Japanese version of HCAHPS, comprising six composite measures and two global ratings, was used to calculate top-box scores (percentage of most positive responses). Candidate case-mix adjusters included age, gender, self-rated general health, self-rated mental health, and admission through the emergency department. The explanatory power (EP) of each adjuster was calculated as the product of predictive power and the between- versus within-hospital variance ratio. The impact of adjustment was evaluated by comparing unadjusted and adjusted scores and by assessing hospital rank changes using Kendall's τ.

Results: Data from 13 602 patients were analyzed. Self-rated mental and general health showed the highest EP, whereas gender and emergency admission contributed minimally. The mean absolute adjustment of top-box scores ranged from 0.77 to 1.96 points. Case-mix adjustment changed hospital rankings in 3.4%-10.2% of all possible pairwise comparisons (Kendall's τ = 0.80-0.93).

Conclusion: This study provides the first evidence-based case-mix adjustment model for HCAHPS scores in Japan. Applying such an adjustment is crucial to ensure fair benchmarking of PX across hospitals and to support data-driven quality improvement and accountability initiatives within Japan's evolving healthcare quality framework.

基于日本国家基准的HCAHPS评分的病例组合调整:一项多中心横断面研究。
背景:尽管包括日本在内的亚洲越来越多地采用患者体验测量,但在确定合适的患者水平调整器和开发病例组合调整的统计方法方面进展有限。本研究旨在利用全国基准调查数据,开发和评估日本版医院消费者医疗服务提供者和系统评估(HCAHPS)的病例组合调整模型。方法:我们进行了一项多中心横断面研究,使用了来自日本83家医院的数据,这些医院参加了2023年全国患者体验调查。对2023年9月至11月出院的成年住院患者(年龄≥20岁)发放自填问卷。日本版的HCAHPS包括六项综合措施和两项全球评级,用于计算顶盒得分(最积极回应的百分比)。候选的病例组合调整因素包括年龄、性别、自评一般健康、自评精神健康和通过急诊科就诊。每个调整因子的解释能力(EP)计算为预测能力与医院间与院内方差比的乘积。调整的影响通过比较未调整和调整的得分以及使用肯德尔τ评估医院排名变化来评估。结果:分析了13602例患者的数据。自我评估的心理和一般健康状况显示最高的EP,而性别和急诊入院对EP的影响最小。顶盒得分的平均绝对调整范围为0.77至1.96分。在所有可能的两两比较中,病例组合调整改变了3.4-10.2%的医院排名(Kendall τ = 0.80 - 0.93)。结论:本研究为日本HCAHPS评分提供了首个循证病例组合调整模型。应用这种调整对于确保各医院对PX进行公平基准测试,并在日本不断发展的医疗保健质量框架内支持数据驱动的质量改进和问责制举措至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书