Patient safety culture in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review of evidence involving hospital pharmacists.

IF 2.2
Ezinwanne Jane Ugochukwu, Olanrewaju Faith Omotayo, Onyinye Blessing Ukoha-Kalu, Isaac Ibezim, Abdulmuminu Isah, Nneka Uchenna Igboeli, Chukwuemeka Michael Ubaka
{"title":"Patient safety culture in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review of evidence involving hospital pharmacists.","authors":"Ezinwanne Jane Ugochukwu, Olanrewaju Faith Omotayo, Onyinye Blessing Ukoha-Kalu, Isaac Ibezim, Abdulmuminu Isah, Nneka Uchenna Igboeli, Chukwuemeka Michael Ubaka","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzag156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient safety culture (PSC) promotes shared values and practices to reduce harm. In low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs), PSC is limited by resources and weak reporting. Hospital pharmacists are key to preventing medication errors and are underrepresented. This review summarizes evidence on their PSC involvement, domain findings, and influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and grey literature (January 2010-December 2025) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251125507). Duplicates were removed in Rayyan. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts against eligibility criteria (hospital pharmacists, PSC assessment, LMIC setting), resolving disagreements by discussion or a third reviewer. Data were extracted using a standardized form (study characteristics, PSC tool, domain scores, predictors, barriers, findings). Quality was appraised with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Findings were narratively synthesized due to heterogeneity; no meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1350 records identified, 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. All included articles were cross-sectional in design. Most studies were conducted in Africa (22; 75.9%). Only six studies (20.7%) focused exclusively on pharmacists. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) was the most frequently used tool (22; 75.9%). Across studies, teamwork within units was the most consistently high-scoring domain (18; 62.1%). The lowest-scoring domains were staffing and work pace (10; 34.5%) and patient safety incidents, reporting 12 (41.4%). Common barriers identified: blame culture (55.2%), severe staffing shortages (51.7%), and resource constraints (41.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence involving hospital pharmacists in LLMICs is limited and largely derived from mixed-profession studies. Teamwork was a relative strength, while staffing and nonpunitive response were recurrent weaknesses, highlighting priorities for strengthening PSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520651,"journal":{"name":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient safety culture (PSC) promotes shared values and practices to reduce harm. In low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs), PSC is limited by resources and weak reporting. Hospital pharmacists are key to preventing medication errors and are underrepresented. This review summarizes evidence on their PSC involvement, domain findings, and influencing factors.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and grey literature (January 2010-December 2025) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251125507). Duplicates were removed in Rayyan. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts against eligibility criteria (hospital pharmacists, PSC assessment, LMIC setting), resolving disagreements by discussion or a third reviewer. Data were extracted using a standardized form (study characteristics, PSC tool, domain scores, predictors, barriers, findings). Quality was appraised with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Findings were narratively synthesized due to heterogeneity; no meta-analysis was performed.

Results: From 1350 records identified, 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. All included articles were cross-sectional in design. Most studies were conducted in Africa (22; 75.9%). Only six studies (20.7%) focused exclusively on pharmacists. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) was the most frequently used tool (22; 75.9%). Across studies, teamwork within units was the most consistently high-scoring domain (18; 62.1%). The lowest-scoring domains were staffing and work pace (10; 34.5%) and patient safety incidents, reporting 12 (41.4%). Common barriers identified: blame culture (55.2%), severe staffing shortages (51.7%), and resource constraints (41.4%).

Conclusion: Evidence involving hospital pharmacists in LLMICs is limited and largely derived from mixed-profession studies. Teamwork was a relative strength, while staffing and nonpunitive response were recurrent weaknesses, highlighting priorities for strengthening PSC.

低收入和中低收入国家的患者安全文化:涉及医院药剂师的证据的系统回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书